Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 45,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Info "Mass dislikers" are beyond pathetic and <85 IQ.

Logicmaxxer

Logicmaxxer

MATH, LOGIC, REASON 3(67+345)+23×53=2455
Joined
Jun 14, 2025
Messages
442
Time Online
19h 23m
Reputation
1,340
Location
.com scientific research institute
Guild
.com math and logic society
To disapprove of another individual within the often ephemeral, anonymized environment of a forum, where interactions are frequently characterized by the transitory nature of digital discourse, is to engage in a behavior that reflects an underdeveloped capacity for empathy and intellectual maturity, ultimately reducing complex social exchanges to petty, affective judgments that obscure the nuanced nature of human interaction.
 
Water with “smart” words

You think if you can formulate obvious facts in a “smart” way => you’re smart

But it doesn’t work like that

I hope you get my point
 
ErichSpringer said:
Could you please explain why you have chosen to use synonyms and complex vocabulary in your text when a single sentence would suffice?
Click to expand...
Certainly! The deliberate selection of advanced vocabulary and nuanced phrasing in my previous response serves not only to elevate the discourse but to evoke a sense of intellectual rigor that invites a deeper, more reflective engagement with the topic at hand. By utilizing a more intricate linguistic structure, the intention was to highlight the gravity of the situation and to emphasize the moral complexities at play, as opposed to merely offering a reductive or superficial response. In this context, language becomes a tool to mirror the complexity of human interaction and the ethical considerations it entails, rather than simply offering an expedient resolution.
 
Logicmaxxer said:
Certainly! The deliberate selection of advanced vocabulary and nuanced phrasing in my previous response serves not only to elevate the discourse but to evoke a sense of intellectual rigor that invites a deeper, more reflective engagement with the topic at hand. By utilizing a more intricate linguistic structure, the intention was to highlight the gravity of the situation and to emphasize the moral complexities at play, as opposed to merely offering a reductive or superficial response. In this context, language becomes a tool to mirror the complexity of human interaction and the ethical considerations it entails, rather than simply offering an expedient resolution.
Click to expand...
H2O again
 
Instead of using smart words you should send a good message

Your message is empty but your words are “smart”
 
Logicmaxxer said:
Certainly! The deliberate selection of advanced vocabulary and nuanced phrasing in my previous response serves not only to elevate the discourse but to evoke a sense of intellectual rigor that invites a deeper, more reflective engagement with the topic at hand. By utilizing a more intricate linguistic structure, the intention was to highlight the gravity of the situation and to emphasize the moral complexities at play, as opposed to merely offering a reductive or superficial response. In this context, language becomes a tool to mirror the complexity of human interaction and the ethical considerations it entails, rather than simply offering an expedient resolution.
Click to expand...
No substantive contributions have been made.
 
Rea Himuro said:
jfl so many pseudo-intellectuals these days

just pale imitations of @Darkeningstar

"muhh chatgpt please correct this text in highly refined english" sybau niga
Click to expand...
Also you are a mass disliker yourself. You should have been banned a long time ago too.
It is rather apparent that, despite the egregious nature of your conduct, you have inexplicably continued to remain within the confines of this platform, a circumstance that can only be attributed to the undue influence you seem to wield over certain moderator figures. This preferential treatment, which undeniably extends to your interactions, represents not only a deviation from the principles of fairness and equity that are supposed to govern this community but also an alarming compromise of the system’s integrity, suggesting that, in your case, the usual standards of accountability and consequence have been suspended in favor of an unwarranted leniency, perhaps driven by personal connections rather than objective merit.
 
Logicmaxxer said:
Also you are a mass disliker yourself. You should have been banned a long time ago too.
It is rather apparent that, despite the egregious nature of your conduct, you have inexplicably continued to remain within the confines of this platform, a circumstance that can only be attributed to the undue influence you seem to wield over certain moderator figures. This preferential treatment, which undeniably extends to your interactions, represents not only a deviation from the principles of fairness and equity that are supposed to govern this community but also an alarming compromise of the system’s integrity, suggesting that, in your case, the usual standards of accountability and consequence have been suspended in favor of an unwarranted leniency, perhaps driven by personal connections rather than objective merit.
Click to expand...
Fat dnrd
 
Logicmaxxer said:
Also you are a mass disliker yourself. You should have been banned a long time ago too.
It is rather apparent that, despite the egregious nature of your conduct, you have inexplicably continued to remain within the confines of this platform, a circumstance that can only be attributed to the undue influence you seem to wield over certain moderator figures. This preferential treatment, which undeniably extends to your interactions, represents not only a deviation from the principles of fairness and equity that are supposed to govern this community but also an alarming compromise of the system’s integrity, suggesting that, in your case, the usual standards of accountability and consequence have been suspended in favor of an unwarranted leniency, perhaps driven by personal connections rather than objective merit.
Click to expand...
Okay but it's okay because it's @Rea Himuro
 
Logicmaxxer said:
Also you are a mass disliker yourself. You should have been banned a long time ago too.
It is rather apparent that, despite the egregious nature of your conduct, you have inexplicably continued to remain within the confines of this platform, a circumstance that can only be attributed to the undue influence you seem to wield over certain moderator figures. This preferential treatment, which undeniably extends to your interactions, represents not only a deviation from the principles of fairness and equity that are supposed to govern this community but also an alarming compromise of the system’s integrity, suggesting that, in your case, the usual standards of accountability and consequence have been suspended in favor of an unwarranted leniency, perhaps driven by personal connections rather than objective merit.
Click to expand...
which mod?~~
 
Logicmaxxer said:
Also you are a mass disliker yourself. You should have been banned a long time ago too.
It is rather apparent that, despite the egregious nature of your conduct, you have inexplicably continued to remain within the confines of this platform, a circumstance that can only be attributed to the undue influence you seem to wield over certain moderator figures. This preferential treatment, which undeniably extends to your interactions, represents not only a deviation from the principles of fairness and equity that are supposed to govern this community but also an alarming compromise of the system’s integrity, suggesting that, in your case, the usual standards of accountability and consequence have been suspended in favor of an unwarranted leniency, perhaps driven by personal connections rather than objective merit.
Click to expand...
View attachment 105058-72dca4e8978bb2df6445ef4c6e0a444e.mp4
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top