LOOKSMAXXING

Join 84,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Mods needs to be less strict

xorsizm said:
@Methodical why so strict
Click to expand...
I'm confused why I keep getting mentioned? It's what the site has always been and has been how Dean ran the site from day 1.

I think the only rules I've ever changed was actually loosening the restrictions and reducing punishments, not increasing them. I think the sharing login credentials is the only one I added that would've increased bans.

Users seemed to of misinterpreted the reminder post I made as new guidelines, which isn't what it's about. I clarify in the post that you guys are required to respect the rules, not that I was adding any new ones.

I really can't help it y'all use Dean's site and don't like Dean's rules, there's a million other communities you guys can join. We're not losing out on by banning people who disrespect the community.
 
Methodical said:
I'm confused why I keep getting mentioned? It's what the site has always been and has been how Dean ran the site from day 1.

I think the only rules I've ever changed was actually loosening the restrictions and reducing punishments, not increasing them. I think the sharing login credentials is the only one I added that would've increased bans.

Users seemed to of misinterpreted the reminder post I made as new guidelines, which isn't what it's about. I clarify in the post that you guys are required to respect the rules, not that I was adding any new ones.

I really can't help it y'all use Dean's site and don't like Dean's rules, there's a million other communities you guys can join. We're not losing out on by banning people who disrespect the community.
Click to expand...
i feel like it has gotten stricter from my personal experiences, sure i just made this acc cause i was on .org before but i would still view .com and see lots of worse stuff than how it is today.

back then people would freely tell people to rope go er or praise these controversial figures. Something even worse is how many people would tell people to inject things not needed, do diys with higher risks than rewards and all this stuff.

ik this is hard to manage but i mean jokeful stuff should be more accepted, no ones dumb enough to go to a lm forum abd actually try to find out how to make a bomb or something you know
 
xorsizm said:
i feel like it has gotten stricter from my personal experiences, sure i just made this acc cause i was on .org before but i would still view .com and see lots of worse stuff than how it is today.

back then people would freely tell people to rope go er or praise these controversial figures. Something even worse is how many people would tell people to inject things not needed, do diys with higher risks than rewards and all this stuff.

ik this is hard to manage but i mean jokeful stuff should be more accepted, no ones dumb enough to go to a lm forum abd actually try to find out how to make a bomb or something you know
Click to expand...
It hasn't, warnings have statistically decreased. I was actually reminding moderators to do more actions because the logs have fallen off to bad point. Only bans have gone up and it's because we ban new accounts that exist to troll, which was always against our rules but staff didn't know how to handle it previously.

We've never allowed praise or usage of people like ER or pedophiles or anything.

You can tell people to kill themselves as in "game lobby rules"- Every single time anyone has reported a random "kys" comment during an argument has had the report rejected. Because it's obvious these people are not sincerely telling people to kill themselves.

The post I made was slightly vague to avoid people abusing the rules as they're written, and everyone's reaction to the post is a perfect example of why I have to do that. If I clarify "yeah this is allowed" then people use it as an excuse of why they shouldn't be rightfully banned. If I say "jokingly telling people to kill themselves" then people take that and run. Because the post isn't a list about how to break the rules, it's a reminder that we don't allow certain content. If you don't know if your post breaks the rule then simply don't post it.

I'm sincerely confused on where this interpretation has come from because everything on our backend says it's the opposite. People want to be on .org and they should stay there if it's what they prefer, not ruin this community.

There's literally been no rule changes. The reason why users are upset is because I made a post being transparent about the rules that exist and they don't like that every time I try to be transparent, for whatever reason.
 
Methodical said:
It hasn't, warnings have statistically decreased. I was actually reminding moderators to do more actions because the logs have fallen off to bad point. Only bans have gone up and it's because we ban new accounts that exist to troll, which was always against our rules but staff didn't know how to handle it previously.

We've never allowed praise or usage of people like ER or pedophiles or anything.

You can tell people to kill themselves as in "game lobby rules"- Every single time anyone has reported a random "kys" comment during an argument has had the report rejected. Because it's obvious these people are not sincerely telling people to kill themselves.

The post I made was slightly vague to avoid people abusing the rules as they're written, and everyone's reaction to the post is a perfect example of why I have to do that. If I clarify "yeah this is allowed" then people use it as an excuse of why they shouldn't be rightfully banned. If I say "jokingly telling people to kill themselves" then people take that and run. Because the post isn't a list about how to break the rules, it's a reminder that we don't allow certain content. If you don't know if your post breaks the rule then simply don't post it.

I'm sincerely confused on where this interpretation has come from because everything on our backend says it's the opposite. People want to be on .org and they should stay there if it's what they prefer, not ruin this community.

There's literally been no rule changes. The reason why users are upset is because I made a post being transparent about the rules that exist and they don't like that every time I try to be transparent, for whatever reason.
Click to expand...
ig then, either way im not doing anything against the rules so i don't really mind, but im on .com not cause i infiltrated from .org or smth i just got banned 👍
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top