Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Hypothesis My Theory On Whole Milk

N30N

I have made it.
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★
Joined
Aug 2, 2024
Messages
8,088
Reputation
26,708
Concept:
Although disputed, it is widely accepted that the pasteurization process of milk has affects of its nutritional content, notably effects on the reduction of water soluble vitamins, and fat soluble vitamins to a somewhat significant degree. Now although I've never seen any source outright say that whole milk is better, my hypothesis is as follows: whole milk (3+% M.F.) obviously contains more fat than filtered, low fat alternatives. With this, when consuming a high M.F.% milk, there is much more animal fat present in the contents of the milk, allowing for a greater amount of fat soluble vitamins to be retained, therefore, making it the healthier alternative. Again, I haven't seen enough scientific evidence to suggest this is 100% true, but in theory it is sound.

Tldr: whole milk (any high M.F.% milk) is superior for nutrition rather than low fat milk.

Sources:





1000025775.jpg

Tags:
@Whitepill
@its0ver
@sigma
@Axii
 
Register to hide this ad
Concept:
Although disputed, it is widely accepted that the pasteurization process of milk has affects of its nutritional content, notably effects on the reduction of water soluble vitamins, and fat soluble vitamins to a somewhat significant degree. Now although I've never seen any source outright say that whole milk is better, my hypothesis is as follows: whole milk (3+% M.F.) obviously contains more fat than filtered, low fat alternatives. With this, when consuming a high M.F.% milk, there is much more animal fat present in the contents of the milk, allowing for a greater amount of fat soluble vitamins to be retained, therefore, making it the healthier alternative. Again, I haven't seen enough scientific evidence to suggest this is 100% true, but in theory it is sound.

Tldr: whole milk (any high M.F.% milk) is superior for nutrition rather than low fat milk.

Sources:





View attachment 65347
Tags:
@Whitepill
@its0ver
@sigma
@Axii
Oh absolutely. Humans are so brainwashed with their fear of fat.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top