JFL My thoughts on everyone ik on the forum (REP FARM INSPIRED BY SUBMISSIVERETARD)

[genio]

YOU HAD NO ARGUMENT YOU ASKED CLARIFYING QUESTIONS LIKE A TARD

Ok even if i asked clarifying questions how would that affect my argument? I was just trying to understand your side better because the point of an argument is to get to the truth of the matter

 

[ecoli]

No bitch

buddy you are homosexual and its okay
i accept you

 

[submissivechud]

YOU HAD NO ARGUMENT YOU ASKED CLARIFYING QUESTIONS LIKE A TARD

sendddd threadddd

I never agreed
n***a you asked me to “prove why historical records are inaccurate” when i asked you to prove them AS accurate?? @Svalbard this n***a is retarded

historical record=info
if u have no info
his arguemtnes better
send threadss

 

[submissivechud]

buddy you are homosexual and its okay
i accept you

we do

 

[Svalbard]

I never agreed
n***a you asked me to “prove why historical records are inaccurate” when i asked you to prove them AS accurate?? @Svalbard this n***a is retarded

He just admitted that his whole purpose in arguing is winning. Therefore he will never admit when he loses.

 

[ecoli]

U js say im wrong and dont reason how

its water thats its wrong
i wont waste my time debunking you

 

[genio]

sendddd threadddd

historical record=info
if u have no info
his arguemtnes better
send threadss

Dude im tired of this

 

[Svalbard]

buddy you are homosexual and its okay
i accept you

Being mixed in with faggots like you makes me hate myself for being gay

 

[submissivechud]

He just admitted that his whole purpose in arguing is winning. Therefore he will never admit when he loses.

noo not true
he wanst to win
not the only porpose
and
eve so
you can admit being wrong while anting to win

 

[Svalbard]

buddy you are homosexual and its okay
i accept you

People like you are the reason homophobes exist

 

[Luxe]

I never agreed
n***a you asked me to “prove why historical records are inaccurate” when i asked you to prove them AS accurate?? @Svalbard this n***a is retarded

That’s beside the point

I said it’s stupid to question history bc anything before the camera would b inaccurate. Which is a stupid question

Again YOU HAD NO ARGUMENT

 

[submissivechud]

Being mixed in with faggots like you makes me hate myself for being gay

funnyyyy
i like u dw

 

[genio]

He just admitted that his whole purpose in arguing is winning. Therefore he will never admit when he loses.

I love ya bhai
But genuinely hes retarded i cant even fathom how stupid people can be
It leaves me absolutely flabbergasted
And then they find likeminded retards and make a circlejerk

 

[submissivechud]

Dude im tired of this

tired of waht
send threasd

 

[Svalbard]

funnyyyy
i like u dw

I don't like you I'm not interested don't bother

 

[ecoli]

Being mixed in with faggots like you makes me hate myself for being gay

we both are f****t brothers

 

[Luxe]

I love ya bhai
But genuinely hes retarded i cant even fathom how stupid people can be
It leaves me absolutely flabbergasted
And then they find likeminded retards and make a circlejerk

This is why foids and low test mother fuckers like you should be turned into cubes

 

[submissivechud]

I don't like you I'm not interested don't bother

i stil have love in my heart for you <3
@1894 was alitle mean at first
i still had love for him
i hope you are appyier soon

 

[Svalbard]

we both are f****t brothers

No we aren't. There's a difference between men who like other men and faggots.

 

[genio]

That’s beside the point

I said it’s stupid to question history bc anything before the camera would b inaccurate. Which is a stupid question

Again YOU HAD NO ARGUMENT

?? You just admitted anything before the camera would br inaccurate???
So how would you prove the legitimacy of roman records
Its logical to question history because anytjing before the camera would be inaccurate and you couldnt factcheck anything @Svalbard is this valid reasoning from me

 

[ecoli]

No we aren't. There's a difference between men who like other men and faggots.

oh okay sorry

 

[Luxe]

@submissive chud

Even if my arguments were bad (they weren’t lol) I would still win bc he had no argument when he claims he did

 

[Svalbard]

oh okay sorry

Yeah exactly

 

[ecoli]

Yeah exactly

im just feminine
im actually a high t bvll in disguise

 

[genio]

@submissive chud

Even if my arguments were bad (they weren’t lol) I would still win bc he had no argument when he claims he did

I literally did argue with you the whole time
How would you argue against someone without a claim? It wouldnt be an argument it would just be one sided opinion with reasoning

 

[genio]

Yeah exactly

n***a im so tired of these retards bro

 

[Svalbard]

im just feminine
im actually a high t bvll in disguise

I didn't ask

 

[submissivechud]

?? You just admitted anything before the camera would br inaccurate???
So how would you prove the legitimacy of roman records
Its logical to question history because anytjing before the camera would be inaccurate and you couldnt factcheck anything @Svalbard is this valid reasoning from me

is correct logic somewhat
but
the way you using it is somewhat wrong
thas like saying all info before cameras shoulnt be taken as true in arguements
you need real reasoning to beleive its not real
not just "it doesnt have photo evidence"(imnot saying u said this, i js havnt seen the thread)

 

[ecoli]

I didn't ask

tuff

 

[Svalbard]

tuff

Unfunny

 

[ecoli]

Unfunny

goes both ways

 

[submissivechud]

@submissive chud

Even if my arguments were bad (they weren’t lol) I would still win bc he had no argument when he claims he did

im on yor side rn
if u or @genio sens thread maybe ill cahgne tho

 

[Svalbard]

n***a im so tired of these retards bro

Lol me too. I only make alts on this shithole to harass them. Other then that I have no use of getting off org.

 

[genio]

is correct logic somewhat
but
the way you using it is somewhat wrong
thas like saying all info before cameras shoulnt be taken as true in arguements
you need real reasoning to beleive its not real
not just "it doesnt have photo evidence"(imnot saying u said this, i js havnt seen the thread)

You need real reasoning to believe it is real
It doesnt work as “word is law” you have to profe that the records were accurate
It doesnt need to be photo evidence it just has to be some form of valid evidence

 

[Blackpillirony]

no tag no care!

How greyfags feel after tagging their circlejerk of greyfags while ignoring the rest of the userbase :

 

[Luxe]

?? You just admitted anything before the camera would br inaccurate???
So how would you prove the legitimacy of roman records
Its logical to question history because anytjing before the camera would be inaccurate and you couldnt factcheck anything @Svalbard is this valid reasoning from me

I said that ironically lol

That’s a lame take, it would be super hard to prove how Roman records are inaccurate or any history for that matter

We have the tomb and cloth (physical evidence) Roman records which they had no reason to lie (historical evidence)

 

[Svalbard]

goes both ways

I literally haven't tried to be funny once on this entire account JFL at your shit comprehension you illiterate turkroach

 

[Luxe]

You need real reasoning to believe it is real
It doesnt work as “word is law” you have to profe that the records were accurate
It doesnt need to be photo evidence it just has to be some form of valid evidence

you do realize you can write down records

Nighas weren’t passing down story’s by word

 

[ecoli]

I literally haven't tried to be funny once on this entire account JFL at your shit comprehension you illiterate turkroach

shut up german femboy

 

[genio]

I said that ironically lol

That’s a lame take, it would be super hard to prove how Roman records are inaccurate or any history for that matter

We have the tomb and cloth (physical evidence) Roman records which they had no reason to lie (historical evidence)

HISTORICAL EVIDENCE IS NOT REAL EVIDENCE ITS JUST WORDS
TOMB AND CLOTH ALONE DO NOT PROVE THAT A MAN WAS RESURRECTED
PROVE HOW JESUS WAS RESURRECTED

 

[submissivechud]

You need real reasoning to believe it is real
It doesnt work as “word is law” you have to profe that the records were accurate
It doesnt need to be photo evidence it just has to be some form of valid evidence

yeeye ik
im js goin off waht ive heard sorry

 

[Aryy]

Being mixed in with faggots like you makes me hate myself for being gay

i dislike super submissive fags

 

[genio]

you do realize you can write down records

Nighas weren’t passing down story’s by word

Holy shit YOU CAN ALSO WRITE DOWN BULLSHIT AND CALL IT A RECORD

 

[submissivechud]

HISTORICAL EVIDENCE IS NOT REAL EVIDENCE ITS JUST WORDS
TOMB AND CLOTH ALONE DO NOT PROVE THAT A MAN WAS RESURRECTED
PROVE HOW JESUS WAS RESURRECTED

no proof
ion thjink he was resurectted

 

[ecoli]

i dislike super submissive fags

 

[Luxe]

im on yor side rn
if u or @genio sens thread maybe ill cahgne tho

I’m not digging it up, you can probably find it if you lerk around genio’s profile

 

[Svalbard]

shut up german femboy

I'm not a femboy + German>Turkroach

 

[submissivechud]

I’m not digging it up, you can probably find it if you lerk around genio’s profile

mehhh

 

[genio]

yeeye ik
im js goin off waht ive heard sorry

Ok bro so what happened was i asked “how do roman records prove jesus was real”
And he asked me “prove the records were inaccurate”
But thats simply just not how it works you have to prove it AS accurate
He gave no evidence he just said that the records themselves were evidence which is circular reasoning

 

[ecoli]

I'm not a femboy + German>Turkroach

im german in my heart tho!