JFL My thoughts on everyone ik on the forum (REP FARM INSPIRED BY SUBMISSIVERETARD)

[Luxe]

Holy shit YOU CAN ALSO WRITE DOWN BULLSHIT AND CALL IT A RECORD

Your genuinely so stupid bro

You can’t even prove why it’s inaccurate so it’s better to trust the records

There was no vested interest to lie bbg

 

[Svalbard]

Ok bro so what happened was i asked “how do roman records prove jesus was real”
And he asked me “prove the records were inaccurate”
But thats simply just not how it works you have to prove it AS accurate
He gave no evidence he just said that the records themselves were evidence which is circular reasoning

What are you guys even arguing about

 

[Svalbard]

im german in my heart tho!

You're a shitskin in reality doe

 

[genio]

What are you guys even arguing about

We were arguinf about the existence of the abrahamic god and i said i didnt believe in it

 

[ecoli]

You're a shitskin in reality doe

yeah yeah whatever you say deutscher bruder!

 

[1894]

i stil have love in my heart for you <3
@1894 was alitle mean at first
i still had love for him
i hope you are appyier soon

I’m not mean i just have no filters

 

[submissivechud]

Ok bro so what happened was i asked “how do roman records prove jesus was real”
And he asked me “prove the records were inaccurate”
But thats simply just not how it works you have to prove it AS accurate
He gave no evidence he just said that the records themselves were evidence which is circular reasoning

oh ok
ur right then
@Luxe he cant directly disprove jesus's ressurection
its immposiisible to disprove an event that never happened especially w how unclear jesusss resurection was
im not saying its 100% false
but you cant rlly prove o disprovei t

 

[genio]

Your genuinely so stupid bro

You can’t even prove why it’s inaccurate so it’s better to trust the records

There was no vested interest to lie bbg

You cant prove it is accurate why would uou trust the records??
Oh my gosh yk what n***a youll never admit youre wrong ill let you be

 

[Svalbard]

yeah yeah whatever you say deutscher bruder!

Allah akbar

 

[submissivechud]

I’m not mean i just have no filters

ur nice now

 

[Luxe]

Ok bro so what happened was i asked “how do roman records prove jesus was real”
And he asked me “prove the records were inaccurate”
But thats simply just not how it works you have to prove it AS accurate
He gave no evidence he just said that the records themselves were evidence which is circular reasoning

I don’t need to prove why they are accurate

They are historical documents also proved by historians lol , you would need to prove why they are inaccurate for any reasonable argument

Which you can’t form bc your essentially a foid lol

 

[genio]

oh ok
ur right then
@Luxe he cant directly disprove jesus's ressurection
its immposiisible to disprove an event that never happened especially w how unclear jesusss resurection was
im not saying its 100% false
but you cant rlly prove o disprovei t

Exactly how am i supposed to disprove it
He cant even prove it himself either

 

[ecoli]

Allah akbar

yes

 

[genio]

I don’t need to prove why they are accurate

They are historical documents also proved by historians lol , you would need to prove why they are inaccurate for any reasonable argument

Which you can’t form bc your essentially a foid lol

Wow i cant believe me and submissivechud are on the same side here

 

[Svalbard]

yes

No

 

[Luxe]

You cant prove it is accurate why would uou trust the records??
Oh my gosh yk what n***a youll never admit youre wrong ill let you be

YOU CANT PROVE WHY THEY ARE INACCURATE

THERE WAS NO VESTED INTEREST TO LIE AND HISTORIANS BACK THEM UP LOL

 

[Luxe]

Wow i cant believe me and submissivechud are on the same side here

You aren’t lol

 

[genio]

YOU CANT PROVE WHY THEY ARE INACCURATE

THERE WAS NO VESTED INTEREST TO LIE AND HISTORIANS BACK THEM UP LOL

Lol its ok to cope n***a

 

[Luxe]

You aren’t lol

Even if you were it would be biased bc he is not religious

 

[genio]

Even if you were it would be biased bc he is not religious

You’re biased because you are religious

 

[submissivechud]

YOU CANT PROVE WHY THEY ARE INACCURATE

THERE WAS NO VESTED INTEREST TO LIE AND HISTORIANS BACK THEM UP LOL

belif
do u think ppl actually see jesus before death???
obv not possible becuase "muhhh free will' and jesus/god interacting w people would counteract free will
they just say it cus they want to continue beleive ing in something

 

[Luxe]

Lol its ok to cope n***a

Genio Admitting defeat again aww

It’s ok you can get pets lol

 

[genio]

Even if you were it would be biased bc he is not religious

Bias will exist in every argument jm sorry to break it to you

 

[Aryy]

what do you gain by arguing against sm1s religion they wont stop believing in it anyways

 

[submissivechud]

Bias will exist in every argument jm sorry to break it to you

i am not ery bias in god
could be or not real

 

[submissivechud]

what do you gain by arguing against sm1s religion they wont stop believing in it anyways

i like
winigng

 

[genio]

Genio Admitting defeat again aww

It’s ok you can get pets lol

n***a arguments arent won or lost
They are simply to find the truth
If both people come to a reasonable conclusion then they both win
If both people continue to disagree and dont find a clear truth they both lose
We’re both losing here

 

[submissivechud]

Even if you were it would be biased bc he is not religious

im not nonreligious
i go to churhc
and i read bible
and i went to islam churhc
and read islam bible

 

[Luxe]

You’re biased because you are religious

That’s like saying a absurdist is biased for defending absurdism

Someone would only be biased if it makes what they believe spoopid

 

[genio]

what do you gain by arguing against sm1s religion they wont stop believing in it anyways

I wasnt arguing against his belief i was just justifying why i dont believe in it
I told him that “i dont care what he believes” but he kept trying to enforce his “truth” upon me and wouldn’t stop after multiple times i told him to chill out

 

[genio]

That’s like saying a absurdist is biased for defending absurdism

Someone would only be biased if it makes what they believe spoopid

An absurdist would be biased for defending absurdism
Its confirmation bias

 

[Luxe]

n***a arguments arent won or lost
They are simply to find the truth
If both people come to a reasonable conclusion then they both win
If both people continue to disagree and dont find a clear truth they both lose
We’re both losing here

Pack it up bro

I had a stronger argument lol. In reality we don’t know the real truth.

I just have better evidence defending a theory

@submissivechud you can agree I won right?

 

[Svalbard]

@submissivechud you can agree I won right?

Why does this matter lmao

 

[submissivechud]

Pack it up bro

I had a stronger argument lol. In reality we don’t know the real truth.

I just have better evidence defending a theory

@submissivechud you can agree I won right?

unwinnable arguement
no viable proof for jesus ressurection
no viable proog against

 

[genio]

Pack it up bro

I had a stronger argument lol. In reality we don’t know the real truth.

I just have better evidence defending a theory

@submissivechud you can agree I won right?

Arguments are NOT MEANT TO WIN n***a
You just admitted we dont know the real truth so nobody wins here

 

[submissivechud]

Arguments are NOT MEANT TO WIN n***a

they canbe
u dont argue to win
luxe likes winning
me too

You just admitted we dont know the real truth so nobody wins here

ye-ppp

 

[genio]

unwinnable arguement
no viable proof for jesus ressurection
no viable proog against

Every argument is unwinnable unless you guys both find the truth

 

[submissivechud]

Every argument is unwinnable unless you guys both find the truth

nono
u win if u get what u want

 

[genio]

they canbe
u dont argue to win
luxe likes winning
me too

ye-ppp

n***a ARGUMENTS ARE NOT MEANT TO BE WON BUT TO FIND THE TRUTH
Yk what fuck it bro 🫩

 

[Luxe]

An absurdist would be biased for defending absurdism
Its confirmation bias

A absurdist beliefs in absurdism or valid reasons they can defend

 

[genio]

nono
u win if u get what u want

No thats just childish and immature

 

[Luxe]

Arguments are NOT MEANT TO WIN n***a
You just admitted we dont know the real truth so nobody wins here

Omg I just explained you idiot

I’ll do it again but so you can understand

Me have better evidence then you, we never find real truth but my theory is stronger yours bc of the evidence and arguments

 

[submissivechud]

No thats just childish and immature

not particulayty
ppl operate diferently
mabye u thinks it is
i like iwnning tho
so whos right??
no one!
we are different
so we want and do things for different reasosn
who are you to tell me why i argue?!!
its all about indivisusality

 

[genio]

Omg I just explained you idiot

I’ll do it again but so you can understand

Me have better evidence then you, we never find real truth but my theory is stronger yours bc of the evidence and arguments

How can your evidence and argument be stronger if we dont know the real truth lmao
My evidence that dogs can fly is stronger therefore i am correct because you didnt state any evidence

 

[Luxe]

not particulayty
ppl operate diferently
mabye u thinks it is
i like iwnning tho
so whos right??
no one!
we are different
so we want and do things for different reasosn
who are you to tell me why i argue?!!
its all about indivisusality

Your right in a debate you define how you win

 

[submissivechud]

not particulayty
ppl operate diferently
mabye u thinks it is
i like iwnning tho
so whos right??
no one!
we are different
so we want and do things for different reasosn
who are you to tell me why i argue?!!
its all about indivisusality

hhahah
and opinions
@genio its js a opinion bro
LMAOOOO
so funnyyyy omg
i mma sleep

 

[genio]

not particulayty
ppl operate diferently
mabye u thinks it is
i like iwnning tho
so whos right??
no one!
we are different
so we want and do things for different reasosn
who are you to tell me why i argue?!!
its all about indivisusality

Who are you to tell me why i tell you why you argue jfl
Sure find enjoyment in arguments but i just want to bring up that they’re originally meant for people to find what is true and what is false but eventually devolved into the slop today where every side wants to win

 

[negative]

@unknown mtn practical guy w good advice WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU IGNORING ME BITCH DIEEEEE
@foidslayer overrates a bit but good advice and DNRS ME TOO FUCK YOU BOTH WE’RE SUPPOSED TO BE A CIRCLEJERK
@wxnter chill wit da glaze twin i love the glaze though so dont chill wit da glaze W glazer
@Dandelions gives me life fuel i love this guy very nice and smart
@chudlite67 very nice idk what she does doe
@paulyune makes cool edits
@iqmaxx actually looksmaxxes very cool very awesome
@Blackpillirony smart, nice guy with cool thoughts
@Dysmorphia very uncanny very tuff looksmaxxer
@jest idk what she really does but shes nice and calls me kawaii and stuff
@Nocturne added me on snapchat i spam him with shit chill guy
@Byro played minecraft with bro pretty thoughtful and nice
@isntnotrepellent annoying n***a i love him
@moonlight1 nice
@Abi nice too ig
@aryaw nice and actually looksmaxxes kinda tuff
@Aurelius74 smart guy his advice kinda ass tho
Why would i get a lefort for slight asymmetry
@Mia heh my protege you could say
Makes water guides tho do better boi
@mus my main account im tuff as rocks boi
@submissivechud fuck this n***a hes the most ignorant and retarded user on this site who thinks hes high iq
@Luxe submissivechud clone
@FryingSeedOils daddy vibes
@Xx_shatterbejshsbwj idfk if you read rhis just know i remembered you but forgot your shit
Very kawaii very nice
@Sal smart guy i love him
@TrueRetard SMART AS BALLLS HIGHEST IQ IVE TALKED TO
@splanky splank
I forgot a bunch of yall probably forgive me

fuck YOU!!

 

[Luxe]

How can your evidence and argument be stronger if we dont know the real truth lmao
My evidence that dogs can fly is stronger therefore i am correct because you didnt state any evidence

No for that argument to be valid you would have to say “dogs fly stronger, they fly stronger because less air resistance”

Claim: dogs fly strong
Evidence: air resistance

You could include a warrant: the air resistance makes the dog fly faster bc it limits the drag

 

[genio]

Ok i feel like i won because i felt like i enjoyed the argument
Dont try to tell me i didnt win because who are you to decide how i define my victories