Join 65,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

New theRetard news

I genuinely cannot stand the false intelligence of these moral arguements. There is none to be had, there is good and evil. It is not hard to understand, why complicate drinking water and not drinking it? Only an idiot would. Once you greyscale the whole reality, then what reality is there? That only happens when you are not living any life or are nothing.
i think to an extent people enjoy playing devils advocate to feign intellectualism instead of engaging in a discussion that would require critical thinking and forming their own opinion
 
i wouldnt call it an outlier but i get u
the influx of men i have seen just joining catholicism to get a catholic girl (virgin) is utterly insane, met one in my church
who'd ever guess we'd have larping catholics
Some of the most sinful scummy men who go to my school love to larp as Catholics
 
yeah i dont get joining a religion if you don't believe in it
The majority of faith believers are nothing but that, they have faith in themselves not the Father. It is why Muslims, Jews and Catholics/Othrodox lots always attend church or some other temple of their faith to what? Yes to be apart of something bigger when the KJV very clearly tells us that if you wish to know what is the rules of being reborn, then you must read the Father's words. Tldr most people who claim to believe in God are liars and are only there to be around others, not to be reborn, to not remove the rot of their past and suffer a new purpose. No, these people are goyim, golemites. You do not need a temple to be connected with God, if you did; then would God not be infinite?
 
Some of the most sinful scummy men who go to my school love to larp as Catholics
dont even that dude i went on a date with from my church throwing a shit fit cos i didnt wanna fuck him first date jfl
 
dont even that dude i went on a date with from my church throwing a shit fit cos i didnt wanna fuck him first date jfl
Did he really assume you’d just throw away your religion that easily? For a one night stand? 💀
 
dont even that dude i went on a date with from my church throwing a shit fit cos i didnt wanna fuck him first date jfl
Welcome to reality. Mankind like to play pure at the Church but once they leave, only the devil is with them. After all, if you believe the almighty is confined to one petty building funded by taxes and usury that breaks the Lord's rules; then why would you believe that he is anywhere else with you? Even then, let us not forget that evil can give gifts.
 
The majority of faith believers are nothing but that, they have faith in themselves not the Father. It is why Muslims, Jews and Catholics/Othrodox lots always attend church or some other temple of their faith to what? Yes to be apart of something bigger when the KJV very clearly tells us that if you wish to know what is the rules of being reborn, then you must read the Father's words. Tldr most people who claim to believe in God are liars and are only there to be around others, not to be reborn, to not remove the rot of their past and suffer a new purpose. No, these people are goyim, golemites. You do not need a temple to be connected with God, if you did; then would God not be infinite?
Im not well educated in other religions, so im going to reply on behalf of mine (there may be mistakes as im not a scholar, so feel free to correct me if im wrong)

Even in Islam, which strongly encourages men to pray in the masjid and where some scholars consider it obligatory for ablebodied men, this still doesn’t support the idea that communal worship proves insincerity or fake belief. Prayer at home is valid, private devotion still counts, and the Qur’an is clear that Allah is not confined to any place. He is accessible anywhere a person sincerely turns to Him. The mosque exists to build discipline, unity, accountability, and shared moral structure, not because God is limited to a building or because believers are only there for social validation. So saying “you don’t need a temple, therefore temples are meaningless and most believers are liars” is a false leap. Not needing a masjid to reach God doesn’t make the masjid pointless, just like not needing a gym doesn’t make gyms pointless. The argument confuses spiritual individualism with spiritual superiority and ignores both religious teachings and basic human psychology about why structured communal practices exist.
 
Im not well educated in other religions, so im going to reply on behalf of mine (there may be mistakes as im not a scholar, so feel free to correct me if im wrong)

Even in Islam, which strongly encourages men to pray in the masjid and where some scholars consider it obligatory for ablebodied men, this still doesn’t support the idea that communal worship proves insincerity or fake belief. Prayer at home is valid, private devotion still counts, and the Qur’an is clear that Allah is not confined to any place. He is accessible anywhere a person sincerely turns to Him. The mosque exists to build discipline, unity, accountability, and shared moral structure, not because God is limited to a building or because believers are only there for social validation. So saying “you don’t need a temple, therefore temples are meaningless and most believers are liars” is a false leap. Not needing a masjid to reach God doesn’t make the masjid pointless, just like not needing a gym doesn’t make gyms pointless. The argument confuses spiritual individualism with spiritual superiority and ignores both religious teachings and basic human psychology about why structured communal practices exist.
If you wish I can bring you many resources on the satanic nature of Islam. I tend to call them Baal worshippers, or at least the spiritual heirs of the canaanites. Islam is one of the most perverted faiths, it is one heavily linked to pederasy, child molesation, r**e, humilation, izzat systems and in general mob mentality and morality controlled by shameless honour.

Ditch the Quran and come to the KJV. What kind of God can you even worship when he confuses you? I can confirm that at least the Father does not.
 
If you wish I can bring you many resources on the satanic nature of Islam. I tend to call them Baal worshippers, or at least the spiritual heirs of the canaanites. Islam is one of the most perverted faiths, it is one heavily linked to pederasy, child molesation, r**e, humilation, izzat systems and in general mob mentality and morality controlled by shameless honour.
go on then
 
If you wish I can bring you many resources on the satanic nature of Islam. I tend to call them Baal worshippers, or at least the spiritual heirs of the canaanites. Islam is one of the most perverted faiths, it is one heavily linked to pederasy, child molesation, r**e, humilation, izzat systems and in general mob mentality and morality controlled by shameless honour.

Ditch the Quran and come to the KJV. What kind of God can you even worship when he confuses you? I can confirm that at least the Father does not.
there arent any mistakes in the Qur'an, islams never confused me
 
exactly after i literally told this man 'nah im waiting until im married' he thought 'yeah shes totally dtf after the first date'
genuinely good on you for sticking to your principles and not letting yourself get pressured at all, more people need to be like that
 
go on then
Surah 9:5 (The "Verse of the Sword"):
"And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them go on their way."

Surah 9:29:
"Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled."

Surah 2:223:
"Your wives are a place of sowing of seed for you, so come to your place of cultivation however you wish and put forth [righteousness] for yourselves. And fear Allah and know that you will meet Him. And give good tidings to the believers."

Surah 65:4:
"And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women - if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated. And for those who are pregnant, the end of their term is when they give birth. And whoever fears Allah - He will make for him of his matter ease."

Surah 4:34:
"Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them."

Surah 8:39:
"And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah. And if they cease, then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do."

hadith from Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236 states:

"Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old."

"In the Ottoman Empire (14th-20th centuries), pederasty hit its institutionalized nadir with köçeks — young boys trained from age 7–8 to dance cross-dressed at palaces, weddings, and taverns, suffering constant molestation. By 1805, 600 köçeks operated in Istanbul, more popular than female dancers due to segregation. Homosexuality was tolerated de facto, with sultans like Mehmed the Conqueror rumored to engage, though Qanun law blended with Sharia to punish sporadically.

Notorious figure: Sultan Abdulmejid I (r. 1839–1861), who banned köçeks in 1837 amid scandals, but the practice lingered rurally — a half-measure against entrenched evil. Norms: Bathhouses and coffeehouses doubled as hookup spots, with literature glorifying “bearded love” for adults but favoring youths. Decline came in the 19th century via Tanzimat reforms and Western Victorian prudery, reframing it as perversion. Yet, this “tolerance” was abuse: boys enslaved, trained, discarded — pure exploitation."

 
If I violently r***d your female family members and then lopped off each of your fingers right after for no reason beyond simple malice and sadism, would you consider that not an objective evil?
Nah. That is evil in my opinion but some mf 330k years ago could also go and do that for rhe fun of it and nobody would think of that as evil
 
Nah. That is evil in my opinion but some mf 330k years ago could also go and do that for rhe fun of it and nobody would think of that as evil
I would beg to differ.
 
Are you retarded? Morals are subjective. If morals were objective we would have always had the opinions on everything but we do not. In the ancient times women were stoned to death for cheating but that does not happen now. Would a person born on the north sentinel island have the same worldview and morals as a teenager in america?

Morals always evolve, if they were objective they would not change because how can god change his opinion
"morals are subjective" youre basically making the same point as @theRetard does. if i see raping a girl is just it is just is that what youre saying?
 
A serial killer could answer no to that question. That goes on to show that morals are subjective. You can not have one united view on morals, it is impossible and for that reason morals are subjective
and would that killer be right?
 
зе ретард алт?
1769396771959.webp
 
do what you believe to be good because you inherently believe that's the best thing you can do in this world.
what makes you think religious people dont do so?
alright, imagine your mother asks you to buy her groceries. do you do that because you fear her? no. because you love her!
we do out of our devotion to and endless love of God.
 
what makes you think religious people dont do so?
alright, imagine your mother asks you to buy her groceries. do you do that because you fear her? no. because you love her!
we do out of our devotion to and endless love of God.
Didnt say religious people are incapable of doing what's good just because they think that's good but said this isn't what religion itself prones.
 
Surah 9:5 (The "Verse of the Sword"):
"And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them go on their way."

Surah 9:29:
"Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled."

Surah 2:223:
"Your wives are a place of sowing of seed for you, so come to your place of cultivation however you wish and put forth [righteousness] for yourselves. And fear Allah and know that you will meet Him. And give good tidings to the believers."

Surah 65:4:
"And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women - if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated. And for those who are pregnant, the end of their term is when they give birth. And whoever fears Allah - He will make for him of his matter ease."

Surah 4:34:
"Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them."

Surah 8:39:
"And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah. And if they cease, then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do."

hadith from Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236 states:

"Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old."

"In the Ottoman Empire (14th-20th centuries), pederasty hit its institutionalized nadir with köçeks — young boys trained from age 7–8 to dance cross-dressed at palaces, weddings, and taverns, suffering constant molestation. By 1805, 600 köçeks operated in Istanbul, more popular than female dancers due to segregation. Homosexuality was tolerated de facto, with sultans like Mehmed the Conqueror rumored to engage, though Qanun law blended with Sharia to punish sporadically.

Notorious figure: Sultan Abdulmejid I (r. 1839–1861), who banned köçeks in 1837 amid scandals, but the practice lingered rurally — a half-measure against entrenched evil. Norms: Bathhouses and coffeehouses doubled as hookup spots, with literature glorifying “bearded love” for adults but favoring youths. Decline came in the 19th century via Tanzimat reforms and Western Victorian prudery, reframing it as perversion. Yet, this “tolerance” was abuse: boys enslaved, trained, discarded — pure exploitation."


context context context :)
 
Surah 9:5 (The "Verse of the Sword"):
"And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them go on their way."

Surah 9:29:
"Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled."

Surah 2:223:
"Your wives are a place of sowing of seed for you, so come to your place of cultivation however you wish and put forth [righteousness] for yourselves. And fear Allah and know that you will meet Him. And give good tidings to the believers."

Surah 65:4:
"And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women - if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated. And for those who are pregnant, the end of their term is when they give birth. And whoever fears Allah - He will make for him of his matter ease."

Surah 4:34:
"Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them."

Surah 8:39:
"And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah. And if they cease, then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do."

hadith from Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236 states:

"Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old."

"In the Ottoman Empire (14th-20th centuries), pederasty hit its institutionalized nadir with köçeks — young boys trained from age 7–8 to dance cross-dressed at palaces, weddings, and taverns, suffering constant molestation. By 1805, 600 köçeks operated in Istanbul, more popular than female dancers due to segregation. Homosexuality was tolerated de facto, with sultans like Mehmed the Conqueror rumored to engage, though Qanun law blended with Sharia to punish sporadically.

Notorious figure: Sultan Abdulmejid I (r. 1839–1861), who banned köçeks in 1837 amid scandals, but the practice lingered rurally — a half-measure against entrenched evil. Norms: Bathhouses and coffeehouses doubled as hookup spots, with literature glorifying “bearded love” for adults but favoring youths. Decline came in the 19th century via Tanzimat reforms and Western Victorian prudery, reframing it as perversion. Yet, this “tolerance” was abuse: boys enslaved, trained, discarded — pure exploitation."


All of these citations are being stitched together without historical, legal, or textual context to manufacture a narrative Islam itself doesn’t support. Verses like 9:5, 9:29, and 8:39 refer to specific wartime situations involving treaty-breaking aggressors and hostile forces, not blanket commands to kill non-Muslims; even within the same chapters, mercy, asylum, and peace are explicitly ordered when hostilities stop (e.g., 9:6). Surah 2:223 is a marital metaphor about lawful intimacy within marriage, not sexual domination; Surah 65:4 regulates divorce waiting periods in a society where early marriage already existed, it does not command child marriage; Surah 4:34 has been narrowly interpreted by classical jurists with strict limits, many rejecting physical harm entirely and reading it as symbolic or last-resort discipline within a legal framework that still forbids abuse. The hadith about Aisha reflects 7th-century Arabian norms, not a timeless moral endorsement, and cannot be retrojected as modern sexual ethics. Finally, Ottoman pederasty and köçek abuse were cultural and political failures, not Islamic law; Islamic jurisprudence condemns exploitation, coercion, and sexual abuse, and those practices persisted despite not because of religion.

TLDR: as usual they're using everything out of context to hate on Islam
 
this is indeed a classic case of it isnt the eyes that are blind, but the heart
 
It is kissed purely as a symbolic act of obedience and continuity not because we believe it's divine lmfao
Yes. For sure not Idol worship of any kind.
iu
 
All of these citations are being stitched together without historical, legal, or textual context to manufacture a narrative Islam itself doesn’t support. Verses like 9:5, 9:29, and 8:39 refer to specific wartime situations involving treaty-breaking aggressors and hostile forces, not blanket commands to kill non-Muslims; even within the same chapters, mercy, asylum, and peace are explicitly ordered when hostilities stop (e.g., 9:6). Surah 2:223 is a marital metaphor about lawful intimacy within marriage, not sexual domination; Surah 65:4 regulates divorce waiting periods in a society where early marriage already existed, it does not command child marriage; Surah 4:34 has been narrowly interpreted by classical jurists with strict limits, many rejecting physical harm entirely and reading it as symbolic or last-resort discipline within a legal framework that still forbids abuse. The hadith about Aisha reflects 7th-century Arabian norms, not a timeless moral endorsement, and cannot be retrojected as modern sexual ethics. Finally, Ottoman pederasty and köçek abuse were cultural and political failures, not Islamic law; Islamic jurisprudence condemns exploitation, coercion, and sexual abuse, and those practices persisted despite not because of religion.

TLDR: as usual they're using everything out of context to hate on Islam




iu



Surah 65:4:
"And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women - if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated. And for those who are pregnant, the end of their term is when they give birth. And whoever fears Allah - He will make for him of his matter ease."
 




iu



Surah 65:4:
"And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women - if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated. And for those who are pregnant, the end of their term is when they give birth. And whoever fears Allah - He will make for him of his matter ease."
Surah 65:4 is usually misused to claim Islam permits child marriage, but the verse itself is about waiting periods after divorce, not about encouraging or legislating marriage to minors. It gives practical legal guidance for different biological situations: women who no longer menstruate, women whose cycles are irregular or absent, and pregnant women, so that lineage, inheritance, and reconciliation rights are clear. Classical Islamic law separately sets strict conditions for marriage and sexual relations, including physical and mental readiness and the prohibition of harm; the Qur’an repeatedly emphasizes kindness, justice, and protection of the vulnerable. Reading this verse as an endorsement of child marriage ignores both its legal context and the broader ethical framework of Islam, which prioritizes welfare, consent, and the prevention of harm.
 
Surah 65:4 is usually misused to claim Islam permits child marriage, but the verse itself is about waiting periods after divorce, not about encouraging or legislating marriage to minors. It gives practical legal guidance for different biological situations: women who no longer menstruate, women whose cycles are irregular or absent, and pregnant women, so that lineage, inheritance, and reconciliation rights are clear. Classical Islamic law separately sets strict conditions for marriage and sexual relations, including physical and mental readiness and the prohibition of harm; the Qur’an repeatedly emphasizes kindness, justice, and protection of the vulnerable. Reading this verse as an endorsement of child marriage ignores both its legal context and the broader ethical framework of Islam, which prioritizes welfare, consent, and the prevention of harm.
Can you read for a moment? "those who have not menstruated." Name one other group that cannot menstruate, the passage does not bring up older women nor widows of such age. This can only be to one group and you know it well.
 
I don't believe in objective morality either, but he's just disregarding collective subjectivity.
If his culture and environment has led him towards this notion, I can only feel bad. But, he's probably just trying to be edgy.
 
Can you read for a moment? "those who have not menstruated." Name one other group that cannot menstruate, the passage does not bring up older women nor widows of such age. This can only be to one group and you know it well.
the claim that “those who have not menstruated” can only mean children is false and medically ignorant. Many adult women do not menstruate due to delayed puberty, hormonal disorders, stress, malnutrition, PCOS, thyroid disease, breastfeeding, or primary amenorrhea all of which existed long before modern medicine. The verse is addressing legal uncertainty in divorce waiting periods when there is no menstrual cycle to track, not defining who is eligible for marriage. It also explicitly does mention older women (“those who no longer expect menstruation”), showing the verse is categorizing biological cases, not age groups. Forcing “this must mean children” is an assumption imposed onto the text, not something the text itself says, and it ignores Islamic legal principles that prohibit harm and require maturity and consent.
 
the claim that “those who have not menstruated” can only mean children is false and medically ignorant. Many adult women do not menstruate due to delayed puberty, hormonal disorders, stress, malnutrition, PCOS, thyroid disease, breastfeeding, or primary amenorrhea all of which existed long before modern medicine. The verse is addressing legal uncertainty in divorce waiting periods when there is no menstrual cycle to track, not defining who is eligible for marriage. It also explicitly does mention older women (“those who no longer expect menstruation”), showing the verse is categorizing biological cases, not age groups. Forcing “this must mean children” is an assumption imposed onto the text, not something the text itself says, and it ignores Islamic legal principles that prohibit harm and require maturity and consent.
Then why do most Islamic nations go against this? How come there are no rights for women? Also stop using AI you sand creature. It only makes you look more spineless. You cannot even defend your own faith with a crutch.
 
Then why do most Islamic nations go against this? How come there are no rights for women? Also stop using AI you sand creature. It only makes you look more spineless. You cannot even defend your own faith with a crutch.
i dont have energy to argue with a guy whos arguing just to argue, so i tell it my idea and my explanation and ask it to make it look professional
 
If some worship it it doesnt mean religion calls to it
Horrible inductive skills
idol worship

noun​

  1. The worship of idols; the worship of images that are not God.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top