Join 54,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Nietzche was a shitty philosopher

Register to hide this ad
can u even really be a bad philosopher, in my opinion not really
so philosophy requires reason, while nitzche literally wrote some emotional bullshit so he is not really a philosopher.
also many philosophers are shit, read protagoras for example
 
so philosophy requires reason, while nitzche literally wrote some emotional bullshit so he is not really a philosopher.
also many philosophers are shit, read protagoras for example
nah ur wrong very wrong, so wrong you should probably delete your account
 
so philosophy requires reason, while nitzche literally wrote some emotional bullshit so he is not really a philosopher.
also many philosophers are shit, read protagoras for example
You're a r****d, truly.

Reason is one tool of many with philosophy, you have, existence, values and meaning.
Nietzsche was poetic and emotional deliberately, that was part of his philosophy n***a.

look at relativism for instance, philosophy isn't about whos good or bad, but how they change the way we think.
 
You're a r****d, truly.

Reason is one tool of many with philosophy, you have, existence, values and meaning.
Nietzsche was poetic and emotional deliberately, that was part of his philosophy n***a.

look at relativism for instance, philosophy isn't about whos good or bad, but how they change the way we think.
his so called philosophy is fully just an emotional shit i'm not even talking about poetics.
and relativism is a retarded idea and self-refuting
 
self-refuting
oversimplified criticism. relativism isn't automatically idiotic ofc, it's just contentious.
Read Genealogy of morals, and maybe elaborate more on what you mean by him not being a philosopher tbh.

Plus, he gave early insight into perspectivism.
 
oversimplified criticism. relativism isn't automatically idiotic ofc, it's just contentious.
Read Genealogy of morals, and maybe elaborate more on what you mean by him not being a philosopher tbh.

Plus, he gave early insight into perspectivism.
if everything is relative then the statement of it's relativeness is also relative. so relativism is literally self-refuting and automatically idiotic
 
oversimplified criticism. relativism isn't automatically idiotic ofc, it's just contentious.
Read Genealogy of morals, and maybe elaborate more on what you mean by him not being a philosopher tbh.

Plus, he gave early insight into perspectivism.
perspectivism is literally the same as relativism but in epistemology instead of metaphysics
 
if everything is relative then the statement of it's relativeness is also relative. so relativism is literally self-refuting and automatically idiotic
You are thinking of absolute forms of relativism though. Most serious relativist don't claim most of that shit.
But tbh, it's common that people say what you are saying.
I don't know much either, so i digress from getting into this further.
 
You are thinking of absolute forms of relativism though. Most serious relativist don't claim most of that shit.
But tbh, it's common that people say what you are saying.
I don't know much either, so i digress from getting into this further.
nnonono they actually claim that shit but they don't understand that their position is self debunkable
 
perspectivism is literally the same as relativism but in epistemology instead of metaphysics
You are oversimplifying things, perspectivism doesn't collapse into total relativism, it shows hierarchies though of perspective and evaluation.
What you said is partly true actually.
 
You are oversimplifying things, perspectivism doesn't collapse into total relativism, it shows hierarchies though of perspective and evaluation.
What you said is partly true actually.
there's something other than perspective.
perspectivism is also a self debunkable thing because if everything depends on your perspective then this claim about perceptiveness of everything is also your perception
 
there's something other than perspective.
perspectivism is also a self debunkable thing because if everything depends on your perspective then this claim about perceptiveness of everything is also your perception
But it's not a self debunking issue, perspectivism already includes itself. Like it doesn't calim to be an absolute truth, it admits its a perspective no? it's just one that explains how perspectives shape every claim to truth.
 
But it's not a self debunking issue, perspectivism already includes itself. Like it doesn't calim to be an absolute truth, it admits its a perspective no? it's just one that explains how perspectives shape every claim to truth.
yeah so even if it admits that it is a perspective (it doesn't), then it's not an objective truth, so no point in that
 
yeah so even if it admits that it is a perspective (it doesn't), then it's not an objective truth, so no point in that
These are all common push backs and i get your idea of it all, you really arent head strong either. But its values isn't in being "objectively true," but in revealing the conditions of objectivity itself if that makes sense.
 
These are all common push backs and i get your idea of it all, you really arent head strong either. But its values isn't in being "objectively true," but in revealing the conditions of objectivity itself if that makes sense.
yeah so relativism and perspectivism could make some sense but only to show that they aren't true
 
yeah so relativism and perspectivism could make some sense but only to show that they aren't true
That’s philosophy questioning what’s true and what’s not. That’s what keeps us thinking. I respect you as a user now tbh.
@Family Guy you're right.
 
is he nihilistic or that someone else
 
Why does every looksmaxxing forum have to have people mentally maturbating talking about philosophy
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top