Orbital decompression - is the botch chance inflated?

[Framemaxx]

Most people who get orbital decompression usually have Graves’ disease which would cause the eyes to bulge out like crazy, cant this make the surgery significantly more difficult to do especially with the soft tissue and bone you have to get rid of since the amount is more within these patients with Graves’ disease, does that mean the likely hood on doing this on someone who mild or moderate bulging eyes due to e.g pheno or genetics make it so theres less of a botch rate since its 15-20%.

Only regular person ive seen take it snd get botched publicly is frank, although he did have 4 surgeries at the same time and his eye are was horrible before and arguably better now, only risks i feel that would apply for everyone is vision issues which just is a universal risk with this surgery like frank experienced.

Need high iq people who know alot about surgery on this

 

[Framemaxx]

Anyways to answer your question, Yeah, n*****s with Graves' disease have to get a more aggressive decompression which is more difficult and comes with higher risks and complications than someone who just has moderately protruding eyes (bug eyes) and doesn't need as much of a decompression.

For mild/moderate bulging, fat-predominant or limited decompressions can have lower complication rates (around 2% which isn't too bad imo)

The 15–20% botch rate is not for all cases, just for ones for people with Graves' disease.

 

[Framemaxx]

Anyways to answer your question, Yeah, n*****s with Graves' disease have to get a more aggressive decompression which is more difficult and comes with higher risks and complications than someone who just has moderately protruding eyes (bug eyes) and doesn't need as much of a decompression.

For mild/moderate bulging, fat-predominant or limited decompressions can have lower complication rates (around 2% which isn't too bad imo)

The 15–20% botch rate is not for all cases, just for ones for people with Graves' disease.

wow tysm heres solution