.org ratings

[General Horst]

.org ratings

 

[General Horst]

Yall mirin the brag post?

 

[ratedLTN2]

Damn son they rated me ltn

 

[General Horst]

Damn son they rated me ltn

are you tho?

 

[Schizotypalcel]

Damn

 

[ratedLTN2]

are you tho?

Reckon I'm low mtn currently

 

[General Horst]

Reckon I'm low mtn currently

idk
org underrates and .com overrates

 

[ratedLTN2]

idk
org underrates and .com overrates

Yea sorta. Guess I'm taking all the info and using my own opinion too

 

[Schizotypalcel]

org underrates

Nah you gotta ask good users, i would suggest n1666 but he dipped.

Another user i suggest to get rated by is kroker.

He predicted my ascension.

 

[General Horst]

Nah you gotta ask good users, i would suggest n1666 but he dipped.

Another user i suggest to get rated by is kroker.

He predicted my ascension.

incel rage vs virtue signaling

 

[Schizotypalcel]

incel rage vs virtue signaling

What?

 

[General Horst]

What?

org has incel rage and com has virtue signaling

 

[Schizotypalcel]

org has incel rage and com has virtue signaling

I was confused i thought u were speaking of the users i stated.

com has virtue signaling

Yes, sadly, i never really took rates serious on this site at all.

 

[General Horst]

I was confused i thought u were speaking of the users i stated.

Yes, sadly, i never really took rates serious on this site at all.

seen a obese women get rated hmtb-lhtb

 

[Randomized Shame]

idk
org underrates and .com overrates

It's almost like the dumb scale is subjective and doesn't mean jack in the real world.

org has incel rage and com has virtue signaling

What are people virtue singaling about? This site is 98% shit posts, nobody is sincerely making threads about social issues.

Nah you gotta ask good users, i would suggest n1666 but he dipped.

Another user i suggest to get rated by is kroker.

He predicted my ascension.

There's some good users who are good at providing advice too and stuff but being 'good' is difficult in these spaces because the person receiving the ratings/advice probably won't change anything. I can see why these sites are mainly slop, as there's no desire/goal to actually take the time to review people's photos to help them out. Reps do better in the Off Topic categories.

 

[General Horst]

It's almost like the dumb scale is subjective and doesn't mean jack in the real world.


What are people virtue singaling about? This site is 98% shit posts, nobody is sincerely making threads about social issues.


There's some good users who are good at providing advice too and stuff but being 'good' is difficult in these spaces because the person receiving the ratings/advice probably won't change anything. I can see why these sites are mainly slop, as there's no desire/goal to actually take the time to review people's photos to help them out. Reps do better in the Off Topic categories.

I mean overrating and being all "nice"

"ohh you're so pretty"
-a girl on here to another girl with severe acne

Not talking about making threads

 

[tuberculosisinmybal]

They told me to kill myself multiple times & that it is over not even hardmaxxing would help me jfl

 

[Deleted Member 66225]

You re probably Brahman, gifted by Ranjit Singh and Vishnu.

That's why they rated you so high.

 

[General Horst]

They told me to kill myself multiple times & that it is over not even hardmaxxing would help me jfl

Why would you need to hardmaxx when you are overweight?
prob some grey

 

[Randomized Shame]

I mean overrating and being all "nice"

"ohh you're so pretty"
-a girl on here to another girl with severe acne

Not talking about making threads

Ohhhh. Yeah we kinda do that. Lmfao.

 

[General Horst]

Ohhhh. Yeah we kinda do that. Lmfao.

jfl

 

[Schizotypalcel]

What are people virtue singaling about?

Nah, I agree with what he is saying, maybe not virtue signaling by textbook definition but more or less subjective vs objective ratings.

one thing I noticed oddly enough is that I get rated better by men then i do the girls.

There's some good users who are good at providing advice too and stuff but being 'good' is difficult in these spaces because the person receiving the ratings/advice probably won't change anything. I can see why these sites are mainly slop, as there's no desire/goal to actually take the time to review people's photos to help them out. Reps do better in the Off Topic categories.

The only advice i've ever gotten from a rating off this site was @neymar, and it wasn't bad advice either, nichemaxxing and fixing my mental health. But the rest was just slop compliments or sometimes even circle jerking that i despise reading.

I liked it better when no one seen my face to comment on it.

 

[tuberculosisinmybal]

Why would you need to hardmaxx when you are overweight?
prob some grey

Were multiple people don't remember their ranks anymore it was 2 months ago jfl got vip to delete the post

 

[General Horst]

Were multiple people don't remember their ranks anymore it was 2 months ago jfl got vip to delete the post

why get surgery when you will still be fat and it'll hide your bonestructre?
anything you do wont do nearly as much if you lost weight then hardmaxxed

 

[tuberculosisinmybal]

why get surgery when you will still be fat and it'll hide your bonestructre?
anything you do wont do nearly as much if you lost weight then hardmaxxed

I know bro, I'm not doing any hardmaxxing anyway till I'm like 100kg, which will take some while but that's what they said jfl

 

[Randomized Shame]

Nah, I agree with what he is saying, maybe not virtue signaling by textbook definition but more or less subjective vs objective ratings.

one thing I noticed oddly enough is that I get rated better by men then i do the girls.

The only advice i've ever gotten from a rating off this site was @neymar, and it wasn't bad advice either, nichemaxxing and fixing my mental health. But the rest was just slop compliments or sometimes even circle jerking that i despise reading.

I liked it better when no one seen my face to comment on it.

I've sincerely never read a rating in my entire life and thought anyone was being objective, ever.

To me, the science of beauty is data points and comparison to other data points of others, and I don't feel like "MTN" or a "7" ever actually conveyed the objective reality of that person's appearance. It means legitimately nothing to me and I don't know why people have an obsession with it.

The compliments are mildly annoying but I view it the same thing as ratings. it's equally as 'objective', which is to say not at all.

 

[General Horst]

I've sincerely never read a rating in my entire life and thought anyone was being objective, ever.

To me, the science of beauty is data points and comparison to other data points of others, and I don't feel like "MTN" or a "7" ever actually conveyed the objective reality of that person's appearance. It means legitimately nothing to me and I don't know why people have an obsession with it.

The compliments are mildly annoying but I view it the same thing as ratings. it's equally as 'objective', which is to say not at all.

I mean humans are inherently biased and alot of thing are grey and not just black and white

but its like a range a "7" for one could be a 6 for another or a 8

but a "7" couldn't be a 4 for someone at that point its objective that they are attractive and above average

 

[Randomized Shame]

I mean humans are inherently biased and alot of thing are grey and not just black and white

but its like a range a "7" for one could be a 6 for another or a 8

but a "7" couldn't be a 4 for someone at that point its objective that they are attractive and above average

Sure, but I don't believe the ratings are that dramatically different on either platform. At least not to say one over rates and one under rates. I would say the issue is the goofy scale and people not understanding what it represents.

Even if people were told X meant Y% of the population will find them attractive or that X meant they're in the top Y% of the population in regards of attraction, most if not all people giving and receiving ratings will ever actually understand what that means or implies.

I don't feel like anyone takes their rating as Gospel; but I have no idea why people have a desire to ask for a rating.

It's obviously an unpopular opinion in these kinds of spaces, but I just think it's done purely as a ego thing and rarely has anything to do with their desire to understand their placement in the attraction market.

It doesn't matter if one site rates 1 score lower or 1 higher than the other site because the flaw is thinking it means anything at all, in my opinion.

 

[AuggyDauggy]

View attachment 99509View attachment 99510
View attachment 99511
View attachment 99513
View attachment 99515
View attachment 99516
View attachment 99518


View attachment 99522

.org ratings

Knew you’d be some pretty ass n***a

Good shit bro

 

[AuggyDauggy]

Sure, but I don't believe the ratings are that dramatically different on either platform. At least not to say one over rates and one under rates. I would say the issue is the goofy scale and people not understanding what it represents.

Even if people were told X meant Y% of the population will find them attractive or that X meant they're in the top Y% of the population in regards of attraction, most if not all people giving and receiving ratings will ever actually understand what that means or implies.

I don't feel like anyone takes their rating as Gospel; but I have no idea why people have a desire to ask for a rating.

It's obviously an unpopular opinion in these kinds of spaces, but I just think it's done purely as a ego thing and rarely has anything to do with their desire to understand their placement in the attraction market.

It doesn't matter if one site rates 1 score lower or 1 higher than the other site because the flaw is thinking it means anything at all, in my opinion.

High Iq response, how does he do it every time

 

[General Horst]

Sure, but I don't believe the ratings are that dramatically different on either platform. At least not to say one over rates and one under rates. I would say the issue is the goofy scale and people not understanding what it represents.

Even if people were told X meant Y% of the population will find them attractive or that X meant they're in the top Y% of the population in regards of attraction, most if not all people giving and receiving ratings will ever actually understand what that means or implies.

I don't feel like anyone takes their rating as Gospel; but I have no idea why people have a desire to ask for a rating.

It's obviously an unpopular opinion in these kinds of spaces, but I just think it's done purely as a ego thing and rarely has anything to do with their desire to understand their placement in the attraction market.

It doesn't matter if one site rates 1 score lower or 1 higher than the other site because the flaw is thinking it means anything at all, in my opinion.

Yeah anyone who post there faces on here ( ela im looking at you) has a big ego lol

 

[General Horst]

Sure, but I don't believe the ratings are that dramatically different on either platform. At least not to say one over rates and one under rates. I would say the issue is the goofy scale and people not understanding what it represents.

Even if people were told X meant Y% of the population will find them attractive or that X meant they're in the top Y% of the population in regards of attraction, most if not all people giving and receiving ratings will ever actually understand what that means or implies.

I don't feel like anyone takes their rating as Gospel; but I have no idea why people have a desire to ask for a rating.

It's obviously an unpopular opinion in these kinds of spaces, but I just think it's done purely as a ego thing and rarely has anything to do with their desire to understand their placement in the attraction market.

It doesn't matter if one site rates 1 score lower or 1 higher than the other site because the flaw is thinking it means anything at all, in my opinion.

I could say that anyone who is posting ratings alot could be implementing something and wanting to see how far they have come or to see if its effective

(new haircut , new product ect)

 

[beautyiseverything]

View attachment 99509View attachment 99510
View attachment 99511
View attachment 99513
View attachment 99515
View attachment 99516
View attachment 99518


View attachment 99522

.org ratings

My ni**a from org

 

[General Horst]

My ni**a from org View attachment 99532

also that gpt rating was innacuate asf
rated tom holland (most mtn n***a ever) as lCL

 

[AuggyDauggy]

Sure, but I don't believe the ratings are that dramatically different on either platform. At least not to say one over rates and one under rates. I would say the issue is the goofy scale and people not understanding what it represents.

Even if people were told X meant Y% of the population will find them attractive or that X meant they're in the top Y% of the population in regards of attraction, most if not all people giving and receiving ratings will ever actually understand what that means or implies.

I don't feel like anyone takes their rating as Gospel; but I have no idea why people have a desire to ask for a rating.

It's obviously an unpopular opinion in these kinds of spaces, but I just think it's done purely as a ego thing and rarely has anything to do with their desire to understand their placement in the attraction market.

It doesn't matter if one site rates 1 score lower or 1 higher than the other site because the flaw is thinking it means anything at all, in my opinion.

The rating thing is a pure ego thing. That’s true, because you don’t need a specific number or term to determine if you’re attractive or not, you’d just know from IRL experience.

People love the highs they get when someone rates them high. It can get addicting. I’m no better

 

[Randomized Shame]

I could say that anyone who is posting ratings alot could be implementing something and wanting to see how far they have come or to see if its effective

(new haircut , new product ect)

That's a good point. I guess I see that as genuinely helpful information counting it's comparison. Not sure if I'd go so far to say accurate, but I can see why someone would find that information helpful.

 

[General Horst]

The rating thing is a pure ego thing. That’s true, because you don’t need a specific number or term to determine if you’re attractive or not, you’d just know from IRL experience.

People love the highs they get when someone rates them high. It can get addicting. I’m no better

Yeah you can tell if your a s5 normie or chad just form a look in the mirror and from life experiences

 

[ragnarok787]

idk
org underrates and .com overrates

i got rated very high on org tho so maybe not entirely , or i was just lucky to get not insecure users under my posts

 

[General Horst]

That's a good point. I guess I see that as genuinely helpful information counting it's comparison. Not sure if I'd go so far to say accurate, but I can see why someone would find that information helpful.

looks arent objecive (fully) so you can say that

 

[AuggyDauggy]

Yeah you can tell if your a s5 normie or chad just form a look in the mirror and from life experiences

Literally. Imo, your rating should be the level of woman you match with on dating apps (if they’re mostly gl, well done, you’re good looking too) or real life IOIs

 

[General Horst]

i got rated very high on org tho so maybe not entirely , or i was just lucky to get not insecure users under my posts

chad isnt getting rated ltn on org if you look good then you will be rate highly
im trying to say that org would prob rate a mtn, lmtn or below and com would rate him htmn or above

 

[Schizotypalcel]

i got rated very high on org tho so maybe not entirely , or i was just lucky to get not insecure users under my posts

Yah i wasn't rated poorly either

 

[ragnarok787]

chad isnt getting rated ltn on org if you look good then you will be rate higly
im rying to say that org would pob rate a mtn, lmtn or below and com would rate him htmn or above

there was few guys who said iam LTN when they started to point out my falios lol but i think that was obvious troll

i even saw people rating gandy mtn on org

 

[Schizotypalcel]

Literally. Imo, your rating should be the level of woman you match with on dating apps (if they’re mostly gl, well done, you’re good looking too) or real life IOIs

Yes, but i'm mentally prone to not understanding that shit at all.

So my cope is a rating.

 

[Randomized Shame]

Literally. Imo, your rating should be the level of woman you match with on dating apps (if they’re mostly gl, well done, you’re good looking too) or real life IOIs

Now that's the truest data point (for men).

 

[AuggyDauggy]

i got rated very high on org tho so maybe not entirely , or i was just lucky to get not insecure users under my posts

Mine was way more of a mixed bag. I had one half saying high mtn- htn and the other half saying shit like this:



I think over here is more accurate since I got answers ranging in the middle

 

[beautyiseverything]

also that gpt rating was innacuate asf
rated tom holland (most mtn n***a ever) as lCL

Did you use looksmaxGPT?

 

[AuggyDauggy]

Yes, but i'm mentally prone to not understanding that shit at all.

So my cope is a rating.

I think you’re quite gl from what I saw bro

 

[AuggyDauggy]

Did you use looksmaxGPT?

Isn’t that bs?

 

[General Horst]

Did you use looksmaxGPT?

ya