Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Pascal's wager is irrefutable

Blackpill Saint

retired from nothing, tired nothing
Reputable ★★
Established ★★
Joined
Aug 25, 2025
Messages
5,234
Time Online
21d 2h
Reputation
11,588
But by the time you get it and work it out for your own benefit, it becomes inauthentic. Buffett and Nuemann are probably in limbo right now.
 
Register to hide this ad
retarded argument because how do you know which god to choose
 
for this argument in particular, it's obviously yhwh man, are you joking?
yes, but what this guy's saying is that the argument is flawed because it assumes there are only two choices and outcomes:
  1. follow god, go to heaven
  2. don't follow god, go to hell
and in real life, the logic can be applied to a number of other deities, like Allah, Vishnu, etc etc. the argument falsely limits it to only one. and it kind of encourages false/inauthentic belief out of self-interest. it functions more as a threat of eternal damnation if you're wrong, rather than a reasoned argument for God's existence.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top