Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Hypothesis Physiologically off vs Physiologically ugly

IMERATOR

IMPERATOR
Joined
Dec 12, 2025
Messages
2
Time Online
1h 45m
Reputation
18
Location
🇸🇾
This is going to annoy some people, but hear me out.

If bone structure was the main determinant of attractiveness, then guys with elite jaws and symmetry would always read high tier in real life. They don’t. You’ve all seen this.

There are dudes with insane facial structure who somehow look tired, dull, or “off,” and there are guys with average faces who consistently pull and photograph well.

That isn’t social skills or confidence. It’s biology.

Your brain doesn’t rank faces by features — it ranks signal coherence. When signals clash, the face reads as low quality no matter how good the parts are.

Common contradictions I see on this forum: – sharp jaw + inflamed skin
– lean face + puffy eyelids
– good symmetry + dead eyes
– thick brows + chronic redness

Each one triggers a subtle “something’s wrong” response.

Here’s the part people won’t like:

A clean, evenly perfused face with average features often beats a high-PSL face with visible stress markers.

Redness, blotchiness, uneven oil, dark circles, rigid facial tension — these scream physiological instability. The brain flags it instantly.

Eye area matters more than jawline in real-world perception. Not eye shape — eye function. Smooth blinking, hydrated sclera, stable eyelid tone. Most guys here completely ignore this.

Another uncomfortable truth: chronic stress shows on your face even if you’re lean and symmetrical. Elevated baseline muscle tone gives that clenched, uncanny look people mistake for “intensity.”

And posture matters. Forward head posture literally impairs venous drainage from the face. That’s not cope — that’s anatomy. Puffy face, dull skin, tired eyes.

So no, looksmaxxing isn’t just adding traits.

It’s removing contradictions.

Most people don’t need surgery.
They need to stop looking biologically stressed.

Disagree if you want — but ask yourself why some mid faces consistently outperform better ones in real life.
 
Register to hide this ad
Most people don’t need surgery.
They need to stop looking biologically stressed.

Disagree if you want — but ask yourself why some mid faces consistently outperform better ones in real life.
It's just insecurities honestly, that's why most people get surgeries and such, to better their looks to feel good about themselves, I think everyone can be happy.

Edit: Honestly I don't know much about surgeries and stuff I never took interest in them but I did see some people fucking their face up even more with that "uncanny, unnatural" looking vibe.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top