- Joined
- Feb 25, 2025
- Messages
- 31,581
- Solutions
- 6
- Online time
- 18d 13h
- Reputation
- 101,124
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hhtn. One could argue CL
If above 6 feet tall, chad.
Height doesn't have any impact on the rating, it adds to smv yes but when it comes to facial analysis it is futile to account for height, status or any exterior factors.If above 6 feet tall, chad.
You should account for all physical traits in a rating, but to each their own. Without height he is still chad!Height doesn't have any impact on the rating, it adds to smv yes but when it comes to facial analysis it is futile to account for height, status or any exterior factors.
No, you rate by facial attractiveness, not by all physical traits. Height, physique and dick size add to smv but they don't impact at all the rating you give to someone. A subhuman doesn't become an MTN just because he's 6'3 and a CL or Chad doesn't become a MTN because he's 5'6 it something.You should account for all physical traits in a rating, but to each their own. Without height he is still chad!
Yeah they don't effect the face rating, but they effect the attractiveness rating. Why would other physical traits not impact attractiveness if facial-physical traits do?No, you rate by facial attractiveness, not by all physical traits. Height, physique and dick size add to smv but they don't impact at all the rating you give to someone.
n***a do you expect a full body shirtless pic for every rating thread ? If you include this then why not income, status and geography while we're at it. It always has been about facial attractiveness, height and physique have their importance but for ratings it's purely on FACIAL attractiveness.Yeah they don't effect the face rating, but they effect the attractiveness rating. Why would other physical traits not impact attractiveness if facial-physical traits do?
Those are not physical traits, they are not directly indicative of genetic makeup/quality.If you include this then why not income, status and geography while we're at it.
If they have an impact and are part of an organism's phenotype they should be factored in.It always has been about facial attractiveness, height and physique have their importance but for ratings it's purely on FACIAL attractiveness.
It always has been about facial attractiveness bucko when it comes to ratings, nothing else. I am not denying their importance in general and their impact on overall SMV but when it comes to ratings it's only and purely facial attractiveness.Those are not traits, they are not directly indicative of genetic makeup/quality. They operate in the exact same way as facial attractiveness.
If they have an impact and are phenotyipcal they should be factored in.
If you want to do face ratings, fine. I'm just telling you that the face rating is not the attractiveness rating, and the attractiveness rating is what really matters.when it comes to ratings it's only and purely facial attractiveness.
No shit sherlock, but facial attractiveness is what ratings always have been about.If you want to do face ratings, fine. I'm just telling you that the face rating is not the attractiveness rating, and the attractiveness rating is what really matters.
Attractive man.