LOOKSMAXXING

Join 82,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Rate ?

IMG_2242.webp
 
genio said:
Join date literally does not mean shit
Ive been in this space before i joined the forum
Check must-reads one time and youll see me all over
Click to expand...
Join date doesn't mean shit tell this to ur low iq bhai then who is larping over join date since the beginning 🤣
 
junebug said:
What about that is wrong
Click to expand...
Do you know what a median is?
Its the number in the middle of a data set
There are way less attractive people than unattractive people so the median would be lower since the ratio of ugly to attractive is heavily skewed towards ugly
And the average is ltb-hltb not hltb-lmtb
 
genio said:
Do you know what a median is?
Its the number in the middle of a data set
There are way less attractive people than unattractive people so the median would be lower
Click to expand...
I was referring to the median based on the rating scale itself, not based on the amount of people that fit into those. Yes I agree that the median based on actual population would be lower
genio said:
since the ratio of ugly to attractive is heavily skewed
And the average is ltb-hltb not hltb-lmtb
Click to expand...
When I joined I was told several times that hltb-lmtb was average. I mean, it's all theory, nobody really knows what the true average of 8 billion people is especially considering the looks scale isn't completely set in stone. If you're right that's good for me though, means I'm above average >:-]
 
trvecel said:
Saar mtn is average because its "mid" tier
Click to expand...
Mtn is mtn because this is when women start treating you as a decent guy and you get an amount of female attention (even though youre above average)
Ltn is ltn because youre treated as a low tier man by women and get nothing
 
junebug said:
I was referring to the median based on the rating scale itself, not based on the amount of people that fit into those. Yes I agree that the median based on actual population would be lower
Click to expand...
Still wrong
Median on 1-10 would still 5 which is hltn-lmtn anyways
junebug said:
When I joined I was told several times that hltb-lmtb was average.
Click to expand...
It’s .com
junebug said:
I mean, it's all theory, nobody really knows what the true average of 8 billion people is especially considering the looks scale isn't completely set in stone. If you're right that's good for me though, means I'm above average >:-]
Click to expand...
Water
 
genio said:
Mtn is mtn because this is when women start treating you as a decent guy and you get an amount of female attention (even though youre above average)
Ltn is ltn because youre treated as a low tier man by women and get nothing
Click to expand...
Outdated shit ??? Wdym n***a saying like the rating scale expired 😭😭😭
genio said:
So youre just showing outdated shit 💀💀💀
Click to expand...
 
truexcel said:
Outdated shit ??? Wdym n***a saying like the rating scale expired 😭😭😭
Click to expand...
2023 is expired yes
Js like how n*****s thought castor oil grew hair and volufiline caused adipogenesis
The rating community has advanced and progressed to a new consensus as formulas got harsher
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 3)
Back
Top