Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
red so the population can decrease
If you have a factional brain you press blue , I don't want the kids to drop dead just because they liked blue more that red.if you have a (functioning) brain, you press red
if you have a (functioning) brain, you press red
I will hit the blue button since I trust people will be smart in their decision.
red so the population can decrease
i don't trust people to not only hit the red button that being said i choose the red button
lemmi yap about his for a sec if you want to understandblue because i love everyone and we all live happily ever after poll closed
thank you for this logical explanation that some stupid people need to hearlemmi yap about his for a sec if you want to understand
lets use a different hypothetical for you to understand me (I PROMIS IM GOING SOMEWHERE WITH THIS)
there is 100 people on a falling rickety wood bridge and each person is given 3 option
group 1: stay on the bridge
group 2: get off the bridge and hold the ropes to save those in group 1
group 3: leave and walk away
if more then 50 people walk away the bridge will fall and everyone on it and holding it will die
if more then 50 are split between group 1 and 2 then the bridge will be saved and nothing will happen
being in group 1 obvously isnt the right choice, you are a idiot if you stay in the situation
being in group 3 removes yourself from the situation entirely and you bare no responsibility for those in group 1
being in group 2 (the people who choose to risk there lives to save group 1) are not putting themselves in danger because group 1 refuses to get themselves out of danger.
now lets bring this back to the button:
the 3 groups still exist
The people who press blue for no reason- because they are stupid
the people who press blue to save the people who pressed it for no reason- risking there lives for people who put themselves in danger
the people who press the red button and walk away
if everyone just walks away from the bridge there will be no danger, and the idiots who decided to stay on the bridge do not deserve
me risking my life to save them
Put kids in the equation and rethink it.IF most become the slightest selfless everyone will survive.lemmi yap about his for a sec if you want to understand
lets use a different hypothetical for you to understand me (I PROMIS IM GOING SOMEWHERE WITH THIS)
there is 100 people on a falling rickety wood bridge and each person is given 3 option
group 1: stay on the bridge
group 2: get off the bridge and hold the ropes to save those in group 1
group 3: leave and walk away
if more then 50 people walk away the bridge will fall and everyone on it and holding it will die
if more then 50 are split between group 1 and 2 then the bridge will be saved and nothing will happen
being in group 1 obvously isnt the right choice, you are a idiot if you stay in the situation
being in group 3 removes yourself from the situation entirely and you bare no responsibility for those in group 1
being in group 2 (the people who choose to risk there lives to save group 1) are not putting themselves in danger because group 1 refuses to get themselves out of danger.
now lets bring this back to the button:
the 3 groups still exist
The people who press blue for no reason- because they are stupid
the people who press blue to save the people who pressed it for no reason- risking there lives for people who put themselves in danger
the people who press the red button and walk away
if everyone just walks away from the bridge there will be no danger, and the idiots who decided to stay on the bridge do not deserve
me risking my life to save them
if a kid is on a falling bridge he should walk away from the bridgePut kids in the equation and rethink it.IF most become the slightest selfless everyone will survive.
So a baby or a 4 years old should make that decision and is capable of making it...if a kid is on a falling bridge he should walk away from the bridge
baby's cant make choices at allSo a baby or a 4 years old should make that decision and is capable of making it...
I won't leave it to a child to decide if it will live or not , it's too much of a risk.baby's cant make choices at all
if a 4 year old is in a unsafe place the 4 year old should leave that place
I can tell by the way you talk you think youre in group 2 but you are in group 1
or tell the kid to press the red button, but if you insist on risking your life then both you AND them dyeing then ill walk away just the same like every single person shouldI won't leave it to a child to decide if it will live or not , it's too much of a risk.
I would choose group 2 even if it costed me.
Take the white pill.
Or you could help like every other people should, we should help those that don't have the ability to make responsible choices.or tell the kid to press the red button, but if you insist on risking your life then both you AND them dyeing then ill walk away just the same like every single person should
Sacrificing yourself for group 1 is foolish. Especially because in the button example there is no group 1 and 2 it’s either press it or don’t. So you aren’t saving anyone you yourself require saving, causing even more people to come and die with youOr you could help like every other people should, we should help those that don't have the ability to make responsible choices.
In the button example is press red or blue, it says everyone in the world meaning even kids and others who don't have the ability to make sound judgement, by picking red you are indirectly killing them.Sacrificing yourself for group 1 is foolish. Especially because in the button example there is no group 1 and 2 it’s either press it or don’t. So you aren’t saving anyone you yourself require saving, causing even more people to come and die with you
This isn’t prisoners dilemma, group 1 no consiqueses 100% live, group 2 might die 50 50… it’s a very cut and dry choicePrisoner's dilemma - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
but you don't know which side has more votes... so you might go for red just for safetyThis isn’t prisoners dilemma, group 1 no consiqueses 100% live, group 2 might die 50 50… it’s a very cut and dry choice
There is a button… 100% liveIn the button example is press red or blue, it says everyone in the world meaning even kids and others who don't have the ability to make sound judgement, by picking red you are indirectly killing them.
Red- 100% livebut you don't know which side has more votes... so you might go for red just for safety
but then some people are retarded and will pick blueRed- 100% live
Blue- maybe die
???? I’m so confused what you guys arnt getting on this
It amazes me how you can continue saying red even if it means innocent lives will be lost ..... DisgustingThere is a button… 100% live
The other button… maybe die
This is the most obvious choice and the fact that we are split on this means some n*****s have to go
It amazes me how you can continue saying red even if it means innocent lives will be lost ..... Disgusting
Why would anyone ever pick blue?but then some people are retarded and will pick blue
So a baby or a neuro divergent with certainty will pick red right.....Why would anyone ever pick blue?
There is no honor in stupidity.
All kids should pick red… they don’t want to die
All moms should pick red they also don’t want to die.
The only people who would pick blue are those who think some idiot will pick blue and they need to be saved…
Obviously a baby can’t choose anything they can’t speak or understand… so let’s use some common senseSo a baby or a neuro divergent with certainty will pick red right.....
Everyone in the world means everyone, but even if baby's were excluded it still stands with the neuro devergents and kids in general.if most people pick blue then there's no risk.Obviously a baby can’t choose anything they can’t speak or understand… so let’s use some common sense