Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 60,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Rinsing it now

Becky4L

Becky4L

Delphine Demarquette
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Jan 14, 2025
Messages
10,079
Solutions
4
Time Online
3d 5h
Reputation
25,300
Location
Iowa
Guild
Blended blade
1756392289692.png
 
Register to hide this ad
Thoughts


17 𝚐𝚎𝚝 𝚒𝚝 18 𝚐𝚎𝚝 𝚒𝚝 + 𝚗𝚒𝚐𝚎𝚕 𝚏𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚐𝚎 + 𝚞𝚙 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚊 + 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚢𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚗*𝚜 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚗𝚒𝚐𝚌𝚊𝚔𝚎 + 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚍𝚘𝚗’𝚝 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠 𝚖𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚗 + 𝚞𝚖𝚋𝚛𝚎𝚊 + 𝚍𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚞𝚖𝚋𝚛𝚎𝚊 + 𝚍𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚌𝚔 + 𝚎𝚢𝚎 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚎𝚏𝚝 🔺 𝚍𝚘𝚗’𝚝 𝚋𝚎 𝚊𝚏𝚛𝚊𝚒𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚑𝚒𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 Like 𝙻𝙸𝙺𝙴
hm: @Knight @twinkdestroyer @JeezyTheSnowman @BlendedBlade🧿 @jane @ela67 @over0 @pepelkant
 
In my opinion

The core principles of utilitarianism are quite straightforward. Firstly, utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory. Consequentialists hold that the morality of an action is solely determined by the action’s consequences. Given a range of possible actions, the right action is the one that produces the best possible consequences. But this leads to the question of what counts as good or bad consequences. According to classical utilitarianism, good consequences mean the promotion of happiness, while bad consequences are the production of unhappiness (Mill, 2015, p.155). An action produces the best possible consequences if it creates “the greatest balance of happiness over unhappiness” (Bennett, 2015, p.55). Here, I do not wish to wade into the deep water of what counts as happiness and how it is measured, though the difficulties involved with measuring happiness could indeed develop into a noteworthy objection to utilitarianism. For now, it is sufficient to take the meaning and measurement of happiness at an intuitive level. Lastly, whose happiness does utilitarianism take into account? Classical utilitarianism views the welfare of all sentient beings equally and impartially. The happiness of any person is as important as the happiness of any other person, regardless of their class, race, social relationship, etc. In sum, classical utilitarianism holds that given a range of possible actions, the morally right action is the action that maximizes net total happiness—which is the amount of total happiness minus the amount of total unhappiness—of every sentient being.

and as stated Nigel farage is a little lizard man
 
over0 said:
In my opinion

The core principles of utilitarianism are quite straightforward. Firstly, utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory. Consequentialists hold that the morality of an action is solely determined by the action’s consequences. Given a range of possible actions, the right action is the one that produces the best possible consequences. But this leads to the question of what counts as good or bad consequences. According to classical utilitarianism, good consequences mean the promotion of happiness, while bad consequences are the production of unhappiness (Mill, 2015, p.155). An action produces the best possible consequences if it creates “the greatest balance of happiness over unhappiness” (Bennett, 2015, p.55). Here, I do not wish to wade into the deep water of what counts as happiness and how it is measured, though the difficulties involved with measuring happiness could indeed develop into a noteworthy objection to utilitarianism. For now, it is sufficient to take the meaning and measurement of happiness at an intuitive level. Lastly, whose happiness does utilitarianism take into account? Classical utilitarianism views the welfare of all sentient beings equally and impartially. The happiness of any person is as important as the happiness of any other person, regardless of their class, race, social relationship, etc. In sum, classical utilitarianism holds that given a range of possible actions, the morally right action is the action that maximizes net total happiness—which is the amount of total happiness minus the amount of total unhappiness—of every sentient being.

and as stated Nigel farage is a little lizard man
Click to expand...
read every molecule bro trust me
 
Toggle said:
In 2 months, I go out and chill with friends how about you? Lol.
Click to expand...
cool f****t im incel ive never felt the love of a woman in my life im stone cold incel n****r blow my cock you little t****y
 
Travis Bickle said:
cool f****t im incel ive never felt the love of a woman in my life im stone cold incel n****r blow my cock you little t****y
Click to expand...
bro knows about this???
 
Toggle said:
Calling me a t****y while wanting a bj, jfl f*g don't project you're fantasies on to me.
Click to expand...
why so angry my guy take a xanax or sum
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top