Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

TFD

Register to hide this ad
What struggle did I project
an-iq-too-low.webp
 
I think you may the severely cognitively challenged spewing shit out of your mouth but can’t provide evidence
Your claim is illogical since there was no insecurity being presented
But keep posting pictures of the internet that’s really good for you
Again YOU lack the cognitive abilities to comprehend what I'm even saying

My claim isn't illogical the insecurity present was that girls don't look at you lmfao

You've been trying to act smart since the start of your joindate and it always backfires horribly on you because guess what? you're retarded
 
Again YOU lack the cognitive abilities to comprehend what I'm even saying

My claim isn't illogical the insecurity present was that girls don't look at you lmfao

You've been trying to act smart since the start of your joindate and it always backfires horribly on you because guess what? you're retarded
How is there any correlation between me saying you would fold for the first female that looks at you to girls not looking at me
Yes I can’t comprehend it since it’s irrational
Even if that is true girls not looking at you is not an insecurity
 
How is there any correlation between me saying you would fold for the first female that looks at you to girls not looking at me
Yes I can’t comprehend it since it’s irrational
Even if that is true girls not looking at you is not an insecurity
It's not irrational you lack the cognitive ability to link 2 arguements together

And yes it is considered an insecurity because you hate that about yourself that women don't look your way.

Every arguement you presented is backed by nothing but bullshit

Don't act smart on the internet when you're you
 
It's not irrational you lack the cognitive ability to link 2 arguements together

And yes it is considered an insecurity because you hate that about yourself that women don't look your way.

Every arguement you presented is backed by nothing but bullshit

Don't act smart on the internet when you're you
Let’s debunk this I said it was irrational because the two are distinct and do not link
You say it’s rational without any argument for why so yes very clever

There’s a difference between an insecurity which is an emotion and girls not looking at you which is a physical interaction
Whilst there is a weak positive relationship between the two it’s a very big stretch to define them as the same

Now why are you so tempomental don’t reason by your emotions use logic
 
Let’s debunk this I said it was irrational because the two are distinct and do not link
You say it’s rational without any argument for why so yes very clever

There’s a difference between an insecurity which is an emotion and girls not looking at you which is a physical interaction
Whilst there is a weak positive relationship between the two it’s a very big stretch to define them as the same

Now why are you so tempomental don’t reason by your emotions use logic
Do you understand what an insecurity is?

That argument is wrong because insecurity isn’t limited to imaginary emotions. An insecurity can be triggered by a real physical interaction.

the insecurity is the fear interpretatio or selfndoubt built around the physical interaction.

so in this case the insecurity would be the emotional interpretation of that interaction, like assuming it means you’re unattractive or unwanted

Again, don't act smart on the internet
 
Explains insecurity in 4 paragraphs then says 'don’t act smart'
Because when it comes to people who don't understand what insecurity is you have to go indepth

Circle jerking in an arguement and still losing is kinda mad aint it
 
Because when it comes to people who don't understand what insecurity is you have to go indepth

Circle jerking in an arguement and still losing is kinda mad aint it
I don't know that bitch, she can shut her mouth.
 
Do you understand what an insecurity is?

That argument is wrong because insecurity isn’t limited to imaginary emotions. An insecurity can be triggered by a real physical interaction.

the insecurity is the fear interpretatio or selfndoubt built around the physical interaction.

so in this case the insecurity would be the emotional interpretation of that interaction, like assuming it means you’re unattractive or unwanted

Again, don't act smart on the internet
This summarised is saying insecurity isn’t just an emotion then goes on to just describe it as an emotion

Look up the definition it literally states it’s an emotion

Saying it’s anything else is logically fallacious
Therefore like I said you’re argument is irrational
 
That makes it better but still doesn't change the fact he got his ewhiteknight to dislike everything i said so he can appear smarter while fully confidently being wrong
Who tf is my circle jerk
Just because two people have discovered your stupidity doesn’t mean they are teaming up just to go against you
You are not important just another r****d on the internet not even knowing the basis of your argument
 
This summarised is saying insecurity isn’t just an emotion then goes on to just describe it as an emotion

Look up the definition it literally states it’s an emotion

Saying it’s anything else is logically fallacious
Therefore like I said you’re argument is irrational
Lard brain, definitions call it an emotion/feeling, sure. But it's an emotion built on interpretation and self-beliefs. an interaction happens and that causes the loop. Pretending there's no distinction is what lets people stay stuck in it.
 
This summarised is saying insecurity isn’t just an emotion then goes on to just describe it as an emotion

Look up the definition it literally states it’s an emotion

Saying it’s anything else is logically fallacious
Therefore like I said you’re argument is irrational
You’re attacking a point I didn’t make even make jfl. I never said insecurity isn’t emotional I said insecurity can be about a physical interaction

again stop acting smart for your sake all you're doing is digging a deeper hole

“girls don’t look at me” is the observed interaction. The insecurity is the anxiety nd self doubt caused by or attached to that interaction Merriam Webster even defines insecurity as a state or feeling of anxiety, fear or self doubt so the definition supports my point it’s an emotional state that can be triggered by external events

genuine iqcel trying to act smart
 
Lard brain, definitions call it an emotion/feeling, sure. But it's an emotion built on interpretation and self-beliefs. an interaction happens and that causes the loop. Pretending there's no distinction is what lets people stay stuck in it.
The semantics are more relevant for the basis of non projection
 
Who tf is my circle jerk
Just because two people have discovered your stupidity doesn’t mean they are teaming up just to go against you
You are not important just another r****d on the internet not even knowing the basis of your argument
if "just another r****d" is dogging on you in an arguement you're so confidently wrong about you gotta rethink your intellectual level
 
The semantics are more relevant for the basis of non projection
Semantics matter, insecurity is the distorted interpretation on top of the real event. That's the actual distinction, not projection.
I'm typing this on my iphone 5 btw, behind a dumpster, getting funded by mc donalds leftovers.
Fuck you, low iq freak.
 
Semantics matter, insecurity is the distorted interpretation on top of the real event. That's the actual distinction, not projection.
I'm typing this on my iphone 5 btw, behind a dumpster, getting funded by mc donalds leftovers.
Fuck you, low iq freak.
why are you behind a dumpster on an iphone 5
 
if "just another r****d" is dogging on you in an arguement you're so confidently wrong about you gotta rethink your intellectual level
Semantics matter, insecurity is the distorted interpretation on top of the real event. That's the actual distinction, not projection.
I'm typing this on my iphone 5 btw, behind a dumpster, getting funded by mc donalds leftovers.
Fuck you, low iq freak.
Semantics matter, insecurity is the distorted interpretation on top of the real event. That's the actual distinction, not projection.
I'm typing this on my iphone 5 btw, behind a dumpster, getting funded by mc donalds leftovers.
Fuck you, low iq freak.
why are you behind a dumpster on an iphone 5
Logical fallacy
Fallacy of composition
Ad hominum
All these in 1 paragraph but sure you’re so intellectually superior and everyone is an “Iqlet” compared to you
Tbh it’s my fault for entertaining I should of just observed the same way you observe fish in a tank just meaninglessly swimming around
 
Logical fallacy
Fallacy of composition
Ad hominum
All these in 1 paragraph but sure you’re so intellectually superior and everyone is an “Iqlet” compared to you
Tbh it’s my fault for entertaining I should of just observed the same way you observe fish in a tank just meaninglessly swimming around
How bro feels after losing an arguement and pretending everybody else is wrong

you're embarrassing yourself no wonder members dont like you
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top