that KIDS act in the US is wild

[dagger]

over
setting a precedent for the rest of us too

 

[dagger]

bump

 

[polgrev]

never heard of it

 

[dagger]

never heard of it

beginning of the end of anonymous internet use behind the veil of child protection

 

[polgrev]

beginning of the end of anonymous internet use behind the veil of child protection

well its been over for uscels like myself just fucking look at our schools and at our people

 

[dagger]

well its been over for uscels like myself just fucking look at our schools and at our people

true, im in the uk so similar boat soon enough

highly recommend looking into this tho, scary shit
cant wait for 600000 n*****s to have their identity stolen or some bs

 

[Br4va]

What is it?

 

[dagger]

What is it?

The KIDS Act (Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act) is a massive, bipartisan U.S. federal legislative package targeting social media platforms, AI companies, and tech infrastructure. It bundles elements from 14 different online child safety bills—including the well-known Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and COPPA 2.0—and recently passed the U.S. House of Representatives. The bill mandates that tech companies verify user ages to shield minors from harmful or explicit content, bans addictive design features like infinite scrolling and algorithmic-driven feeds for kids, and heavily restricts disappearing messages on youth-oriented platforms. It also forces apps to give parents robust control dashboards to monitor screen time and manage default privacy settings.
The main point of controversy surrounding the bill is how platforms will actually enforce these mandates, with digital rights groups warning it will drastically alter the internet for adults too. To prove they aren't serving restricted content to minors and avoid catastrophic legal liability, tech companies will practically be forced to implement widespread age-gating across the regular web. This means everyday users could soon face "account walls" requiring government IDs, facial scans, or credit cards just to access mainstream websites or view basic content. Additionally, critics warn the language creates backdoor pressures on tech companies to weaken end-to-end encryption so they can monitor private messages for prohibited material.
Currently, the legislation is heading into a major battle in the Senate. It faces two major hurdles before it can become federal law. First, the House stripped out a controversial "duty of care" provision from the original Senate version, which would have forced platforms to actively mitigate abstract psychological harms, and Senate sponsors are fighting to put it back in. Second, bipartisan coalitions of State Attorneys General are warning that this federal bill might accidentally override and weaken stronger, existing state-level protections, such as New York's newly finalized SAFE for Kids Act, which already aggressively targets algorithmic feeds.

 

[Br4va]

The KIDS Act (Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act) is a massive, bipartisan U.S. federal legislative package targeting social media platforms, AI companies, and tech infrastructure. It bundles elements from 14 different online child safety bills—including the well-known Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and COPPA 2.0—and recently passed the U.S. House of Representatives. The bill mandates that tech companies verify user ages to shield minors from harmful or explicit content, bans addictive design features like infinite scrolling and algorithmic-driven feeds for kids, and heavily restricts disappearing messages on youth-oriented platforms. It also forces apps to give parents robust control dashboards to monitor screen time and manage default privacy settings.
The main point of controversy surrounding the bill is how platforms will actually enforce these mandates, with digital rights groups warning it will drastically alter the internet for adults too. To prove they aren't serving restricted content to minors and avoid catastrophic legal liability, tech companies will practically be forced to implement widespread age-gating across the regular web. This means everyday users could soon face "account walls" requiring government IDs, facial scans, or credit cards just to access mainstream websites or view basic content. Additionally, critics warn the language creates backdoor pressures on tech companies to weaken end-to-end encryption so they can monitor private messages for prohibited material.
Currently, the legislation is heading into a major battle in the Senate. It faces two major hurdles before it can become federal law. First, the House stripped out a controversial "duty of care" provision from the original Senate version, which would have forced platforms to actively mitigate abstract psychological harms, and Senate sponsors are fighting to put it back in. Second, bipartisan coalitions of State Attorneys General are warning that this federal bill might accidentally override and weaken stronger, existing state-level protections, such as New York's newly finalized SAFE for Kids Act, which already aggressively targets algorithmic feeds.

Wtf

 

[dagger]

The KIDS Act (Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act) is a massive, bipartisan U.S. federal legislative package targeting social media platforms, AI companies, and tech infrastructure. It bundles elements from 14 different online child safety bills—including the well-known Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and COPPA 2.0—and recently passed the U.S. House of Representatives. The bill mandates that tech companies verify user ages to shield minors from harmful or explicit content, bans addictive design features like infinite scrolling and algorithmic-driven feeds for kids, and heavily restricts disappearing messages on youth-oriented platforms. It also forces apps to give parents robust control dashboards to monitor screen time and manage default privacy settings.
The main point of controversy surrounding the bill is how platforms will actually enforce these mandates, with digital rights groups warning it will drastically alter the internet for adults too. To prove they aren't serving restricted content to minors and avoid catastrophic legal liability, tech companies will practically be forced to implement widespread age-gating across the regular web. This means everyday users could soon face "account walls" requiring government IDs, facial scans, or credit cards just to access mainstream websites or view basic content. Additionally, critics warn the language creates backdoor pressures on tech companies to weaken end-to-end encryption so they can monitor private messages for prohibited material.
Currently, the legislation is heading into a major battle in the Senate. It faces two major hurdles before it can become federal law. First, the House stripped out a controversial "duty of care" provision from the original Senate version, which would have forced platforms to actively mitigate abstract psychological harms, and Senate sponsors are fighting to put it back in. Second, bipartisan coalitions of State Attorneys General are warning that this federal bill might accidentally override and weaken stronger, existing state-level protections, such as New York's newly finalized SAFE for Kids Act, which already aggressively targets algorithmic feeds.

what is funny @Byro

 

[Byro]

The KIDS Act (Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act) is a massive, bipartisan U.S. federal legislative package targeting social media platforms, AI companies, and tech infrastructure. It bundles elements from 14 different online child safety bills—including the well-known Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and COPPA 2.0—and recently passed the U.S. House of Representatives. The bill mandates that tech companies verify user ages to shield minors from harmful or explicit content, bans addictive design features like infinite scrolling and algorithmic-driven feeds for kids, and heavily restricts disappearing messages on youth-oriented platforms. It also forces apps to give parents robust control dashboards to monitor screen time and manage default privacy settings.
The main point of controversy surrounding the bill is how platforms will actually enforce these mandates, with digital rights groups warning it will drastically alter the internet for adults too. To prove they aren't serving restricted content to minors and avoid catastrophic legal liability, tech companies will practically be forced to implement widespread age-gating across the regular web. This means everyday users could soon face "account walls" requiring government IDs, facial scans, or credit cards just to access mainstream websites or view basic content. Additionally, critics warn the language creates backdoor pressures on tech companies to weaken end-to-end encryption so they can monitor private messages for prohibited material.
Currently, the legislation is heading into a major battle in the Senate. It faces two major hurdles before it can become federal law. First, the House stripped out a controversial "duty of care" provision from the original Senate version, which would have forced platforms to actively mitigate abstract psychological harms, and Senate sponsors are fighting to put it back in. Second, bipartisan coalitions of State Attorneys General are warning that this federal bill might accidentally override and weaken stronger, existing state-level protections, such as New York's newly finalized SAFE for Kids Act, which already aggressively targets algorithmic feeds.

"for tha kids and shiet" n***a they are the ones eating and raping babies LOL
they just want ur data to sell and enforce city wide surveillance with digital and artificial intgelligence
i knew someone who worked with everbridge (the people who utilise surveillance and digital profiling)
and i saw his setup which had access to cameras all over the USA and some of EUROPE too. he also had tools that could actively predict the routes people take and "high risk" areas based on probabilities. its alot more real then you think infact its already happening under your noses
i shouldnt be talking about this he signed an NDA and a government binding contract to secrecy

 

[dagger]

what is funny @Byro

nvm

 

[Byro]

the surveillance state isnt new its just come to light with recent events and current times
people need to start doing something about it or it will become a dystopia

 

[dagger]

"for tha kids and shiet" n***a they are the ones eating and raping babies LOL
they just want ur data to sell and enforce city wide surveillance with digital and artificial intgelligence
i knew someone who worked with everbridge (the people who utilise surveillance and digital profiling)
and i saw his setup which had access to cameras all over the USA and some of EUROPE too. he also had tools that could actively predict the routes people take and "high risk" areas based on probabilities. its alot more real then you think infact its already happening under your noses

yeah the behavioural tracking is crazy, same shit happens online too

i shouldnt be talking about this he signed an NDA

non issue nobody cares about NDAs anyway, they are just to instil fear

and a government binding contract to secrecy

could be an issue but tbh lot of people know this anyway doubt they’d pursue

 

[Byro]

yeah the behavioural tracking is crazy, same shit happens online too

non issue nobody cares about NDAs anyway, they are just to instil fear

could be an issue but tbh lot of people know this anyway doubt they’d pursue

feds wont be looking on looksmaxxing.com anyways lol
it was ages ago he did it he is currently working a new job in comp sci
it was about 10 years ago

 

[dagger]

the surveillance state isnt new its just come to light with recent events and current times

the extent of it (obv especially online) is new relative to how long the state itself has been around
flock camera shit too, glad ppl are breaking that shit

people need to start doing something about it or it will become a dystopia

people are to some extent but what can you rlly do

 

[dagger]

feds wont be looking on looksmaxxing.com anyways lol
it was ages ago he did it he is currently working a new job in comp sci
it was about 10 years ago

@Dean has gov bots in this forum water, js look at online members
no ‘guest’ is reading my bs right now
I see u mr burnham i know u see me

 

[dagger]

@Dean how much do they pay u deaner
check my ip im an Israelite u can tell me