Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

the answer to inceldom and hypergamy, is a world war

Marinetti's top guy

Marinetti's number one guy
Banned
Joined
Aug 18, 2026
Messages
254
Online time
16h 34m
Reputation
277
Location
Latina, Lazio
there is currently a major issue right now where there are more men then women (for every 1 women, there's 2 to 3 men)
this means women are as of right now the sexual deciders and have more power over the sex and romance scene then any other period in human history
aka it makes hypergamy trillion times worse then its meant to be

so the only way to fix this is to kill off 1/3rd of all men
only way to realistically do this is by having a world war
the ussr is a good example
in 1939 there was 81,664,981 men and 88,802,205 women
although skewed (with a majority of the women being over the age of 35, compared to most men being under the age of 35)

by 1945 12 million men were killed in the 18 to 30 age cohort compared to only 100,000 to 200,000 female soldiers killed in the same age cohort.
leaving an excess of women to the average man by 1946

so if the west wants to beat hypergamy and inceldom

550 million men live in the western world compared to 552 million women (remeber large portions are married with under 30s being a minority)
if we kill off 10 to 30 million men aged 20 to 35

this will leave an immense excess of women which will instantly destroy the sexual power imbalance that has been skewed to women since the 1960s

tldr; we gotta kill 30 million people for pussy my n***a
 
Register to hide this ad
The answer to inceldom is too kill all incels and ethnics

Even after world war women would not choose a incel or be with him
 
The answer to inceldom is too kill all incels and ethnics

Even after world war women would not choose a incel or be with him
You are underestimating how much moral damage a world war can do to women

if its especially bad, incels might be wanted due to lack of chads and men in general
of course sub2s and deathnics are going to die off anyways, but atleast they die with honour
 
women have laways been the sex keepers even if we kill all incel they would become even more hypergamous omfg
 
You are underestimating how much moral damage a world war can do to women

if its especially bad, incels might be wanted due to lack of chads and men in general
of course sub2s and deathnics are going to die off anyways, but atleast they die with honour
ur basing urself on times where women were already abused didnt have equal rights and were traded like proprety and on top of it they were also financially abused if a war would break out and kill half the male population what makes u think they would go after incels
 
women have laways been the sex keepers even if we kill all incel they would become even more hypergamous omfg
if we kill of 30 million men aged 18 to 45
that leaves an excess of approximately 30 million single women

can't be hypergamous if most if not all chads are dead

female hypergamy will obviously come back but we would still have 5 to 10 years of male hypergamy
 
ur basing urself on times where women were already abused didnt have equal rights and were traded like proprety and on top of it they were also financially abused if a war would break out and kill half the male population what makes u think they would go after incels
they would go after incels because no one is actually left lmao

if the male 18 to 35 cohort is cut by 60 to 70%
most women will actually be forced to settle for men they would actually spit on pre war
 
if we kill of 30 million men aged 18 to 45
that leaves an excess of approximately 30 million single women

can't be hypergamous if most if not all chads are dead

female hypergamy will obviously come back but we would still have 5 to 10 years of male hypergamy
the leasst that women settle for is a 5 or 6 its just doesnt make sense times have cchanged u dont come from the war now and get handed a wife
 
they would go after incels because no one is actually left lmao

if the male 18 to 35 cohort is cut by 60 to 70%
most women will actually be forced to settle for men they would actually spit on pre war
they would be even more hypergamous bc now theres a shortage of chads asw which will only increase demand this phenomenon is called acute scarsity
 
You are underestimating how much moral damage a world war can do to women

if its especially bad, incels might be wanted due to lack of chads and men in general
of course sub2s and deathnics are going to die off anyways, but atleast they die with honour
They will never be wanted
 
the leasst that women settle for is a 5 or 6 its just doesnt make sense times have cchanged u dont come from the war now and get handed a wife
true you won't get handed one

but the hypergamy of now is 7 to 8 being the goal for women
and with 5 to 6 being the ones usually picked by women

so if we kill off most
that will practically turn 7 to 8s extinct

and 5 to 6 as rare as 7 to 8s who will temporarily become the 7 to 8s
this will force women to pick the 3 to 4s as they are all thats left


sub3s are bound to die anyways so they are fucked anyways
 
this thread is ignoring women natural biological instinct no it doesnt work like thatt acc kill as many men as u want kill all the male population and keep 1 incel he'd still be ignored by women
 
true you won't get handed one

but the hypergamy of now is 7 to 8 being the goal for women
and with 5 to 6 being the ones usually picked by women

so if we kill off most
that will practically turn 7 to 8s extinct

and 5 to 6 as rare as 7 to 8s who will temporarily become the 7 to 8s
this will force women to pick the 3 to 4s as they are all thats left


sub3s are bound to die anyways so they are fucked anyways
i disagree 5 and 6 are in that category for a reason you have to take it from an individual stand point and not js metrics bc u simply cannot ignore the facial flaws of a 5 and try to gaslight me into believing hes acc a 7
 
this thread is ignoring women natural biological instinct no it doesnt work like thatt acc kill as many men as u want kill all the male population and keep 1 incel he'd still be ignored by women
so explain why for paraguay after the war of the triple alliance
(which had suffered around 50 to 70% male population being killed off)

had even men who were deemed as "trash" reproducing with multiple women?

i'm not saying it will be permanent but it will give the average (none sub3) incel around 2 to 5 years to larp as chad
(as again, if 30 million men are dead that means most if not all chad's are dead)
 
i disagree 5 and 6 are in that category for a reason you have to take it from an individual stand point and not js metrics bc u simply cannot ignore the facial flaws of a 5 and try to gaslight me into believing hes acc a 7
he will be viewed as a 7 societal
as there is no actual 7 there to compare him too

like i said its a temporary solution as the moment 7s come back

the 5 will return to being viewed as a 5
 
so explain why for paraguay after the war of the triple alliance
(which had suffered around 50 to 70% male population being killed off)

had even men who were deemed as "trash" reproducing with multiple women?

i'm not saying it will be permanent but it will give the average (none sub3) incel around 2 to 5 years to larp as chad
(as again, if 30 million men are dead that means most if not all chad's are dead)
women in south america are hypogamous already matter of fact some ppl use south america to disprove hypergammy bc the women already are marrying the 3 and 4
 
he will be viewed as a 7 societal
as there is no actual 7 there to compare him too

like i said its a temporary solution as the moment 7s come back

the 5 will return to being viewed as a 5
okay there go ur solution isnt as good acc the only solution is very very goodd technological advancement and health care that would force an evolutionary response so women would stop being hypergamous
 
okay there go ur solution isnt as good acc the only solution is very very goodd technological advancement and health care that would force an evolutionary response so women would stop being hypergamous
women in northern europe societies are evolving as we speak bc their society is so safe and advanced theres nothing triggering their biological instinct to want a tall man to ensure the survival of offsprings and they started marrying short men as a consequence
 
okay there go ur solution isnt as good acc the only solution is very very goodd technological advancement and health care that would force an evolutionary response so women would stop being hypergamous
i don't think its possible to stop hypergamy with technology
remember governments love hypergamy

it keeps women easily enslaved

any technological advancement would just be used to make better and better looking chads
worsening hypergamy
 
women in northern europe societies are evolving as we speak bc their society is so safe and advanced theres nothing triggering their biological instinct to want a tall man to ensure the survival of offsprings and they started marrying short men as a consequence
thats actual cope bro

wanting tall man started off as a biological want, but quickly became a societal marker of female sexual success

and short men in northern europe aren't getting married
its infact worse as women either don't marry or marry tall
 
i don't think its possible to stop hypergamy with technology
remember governments love hypergamy

it keeps women easily enslaved

any technological advancement would just be used to make better and better looking chads
worsening hypergamy
it is very possible every now and then a new potent hairloss drug come out yes its mainly for chads but we can beneffit from it too
 
thats actual cope bro

wanting tall man started off as a biological want, but quickly became a societal marker of female sexual success

and short men in northern europe aren't getting married
its infact worse as women either don't marry or marry tall
if you base urself off a tik tok 20yo foid being a whore for likes or trying to appeal to other whores then it explains why you think that
women will marry sshort but as a way of setteling down but she'll be very unsatisfied almost like an arranged marriage
 
it is very possible every now and then a new potent hairloss drug come out yes its mainly for chads but we can beneffit from it too
a chad can get away with being bald lmao

what makes a chad a chad is their facial bone structure and facial harmony
both of which are genetic

and if those improve it will raise the bar higher
 
if you base urself off a tik tok 20yo foid being a whore for likes or trying to appeal to other whores then it explains why you think that
women will marry sshort but as a way of setteling down but she'll be very unsatisfied almost like an arranged marriage
oh if you mean in the settling down sense
then yeah alot of foids do marry shorter men as they seem "safe" while dreaming of chad

but if Chad's are nonexistent it won't really be settling down, as they're will be a majority of women to every man

making men more and more the sexual chooser
 
a chad can get away with being bald lmao

what makes a chad a chad is their facial bone structure and facial harmony
both of which are genetic

and if those improve it will raise the bar higher
false everything matters even hair
if u have no hair u havve no life
 
oh if you mean in the settling down sense
then yeah alot of foids do marry shorter men as they seem "safe" while dreaming of chad

but if Chad's are nonexistent it won't really be settling down, as they're will be a majority of women to every man

making men more and more the sexual chooser
men have never been the sex keepers bc they dont experience as many cons and side effects during reproduction as women hence why women are insanely hypergamous in first place and frankly men woould never be sex deciders only evolution can decide that
 
men have never been the sex keepers bc they dont experience as many cons and side effects during reproduction as women hence why women are insanely hypergamous in first place and frankly men woould never be sex deciders only evolution can decide that
i have to disagree
many third and second world nations
have men be the sexual decider due to women being more common then men

leading to women fighting over a average man to marry him, as their is a lack of single men in general
 
if we kill of 30 million men aged 18 to 45
that leaves an excess of approximately 30 million single women

can't be hypergamous if most if not all chads are dead

female hypergamy will obviously come back but we would still have 5 to 10 years of male hypergamy
Still gotta deal with the technology and globalization factor. Even if there are less men, that won’t be motivation enough for them to drop their standards. They still would hve social media, dating apps, where they’ll always hve the upper hand even if the ratio of men to women is more balanced
 
Still gotta deal with the technology and globalization factor. Even if there are less men, that won’t be motivation enough for them to drop their standards. They still would hve social media, dating apps, where they’ll always hve the upper hand even if the ratio of men to women is more balanced
honestly very true

the best scenario would be for
1: a more equal gender balance or one skewed towards more women then men
2: the internet being widely discredited and or outright destroyed

both of which can realistically happen after a global war
 
i have to disagree
many third and second world nations
have men be the sexual decider due to women being more common then men

leading to women fighting over a average man to marry him, as their is a lack of single men in general
these are undesirable ethnic women we can take inspirations from their society maybe to kinda do the same here but still most of them have some sort of thing bounding them like religions financial problems or lack of freedom
 
honestly very true

the best scenario would be for
1: a more equal gender balance or one skewed towards more women then men
2: the internet being widely discredited and or outright destroyed

both of which can realistically happen after a global war
this guy goes to bed dreaming of a world war
 
these are undesirable ethnic women we can take inspirations from their society maybe to kinda do the same here but still most of them have some sort of thing bounding them like religions financial problems or lack of freedom
not wrong

but i think even if those things existed if there was still more men then women it wouldn't change anything

india has all of those pressures on women but has more men then women
leaving a large percentage of men without women

you need a combination of more women then men
and more importantly something that forces them into marrying or getting into sexual relantionships with men
 
Yes actually
i'm a proud futurist and masturbate to the idea of dying in a muddy field in eastern europe or eastern asia
during the third world war
yes but its not the answer to hypergammy
 
Yes actually
i'm a proud futurist and masturbate to the idea of dying in a muddy field in eastern europe or eastern asia
during the third world war
you would realistically be killed by a drone controlled by an autist somewhere underground theres no romance in war anymore
 
honestly very true

the best scenario would be for
1: a more equal gender balance or one skewed towards more women then men
2: the internet being widely discredited and or outright destroyed

both of which can realistically happen after a global war
Feels like the cat’s outta the bag for 2 unfortunately, too many things rely on the internet
 
there is currently a major issue right now where there are more men then women (for every 1 women, there's 2 to 3 men)
this means women are as of right now the sexual deciders and have more power over the sex and romance scene then any other period in human history
aka it makes hypergamy trillion times worse then its meant to be

so the only way to fix this is to kill off 1/3rd of all men
only way to realistically do this is by having a world war
the ussr is a good example
in 1939 there was 81,664,981 men and 88,802,205 women
although skewed (with a majority of the women being over the age of 35, compared to most men being under the age of 35)

by 1945 12 million men were killed in the 18 to 30 age cohort compared to only 100,000 to 200,000 female soldiers killed in the same age cohort.
leaving an excess of women to the average man by 1946

so if the west wants to beat hypergamy and inceldom

550 million men live in the western world compared to 552 million women (remeber large portions are married with under 30s being a minority)
if we kill off 10 to 30 million men aged 20 to 35

this will leave an immense excess of women which will instantly destroy the sexual power imbalance that has been skewed to women since the 1960s

tldr; we gotta kill 30 million people for pussy my n***a
Actually its tfr and tfd that's the answer
 
you would realistically be killed by a drone controlled by an autist somewhere underground theres no romance in war anymore
the fact that i could die to a drone means there's still a romance
for me, the romance of war is that i'm free to both live and die

in a trench both the sub3 and chad will die to a drone or bullet
and i find that beautiful how war destroys social borders
 
the fact that i could die to a drone means there's still a romance
for me, the romance of war is that i'm free to both live and die

in a trench both the sub3 and chad will die to a drone or bullet
and i find that beautiful how war destroys social borders
There's a family guy clip i remember that discribes this scenario but i can never find it
 
the fact that i could die to a drone means there's still a romance
for me, the romance of war is that i'm free to both live and die

in a trench both the sub3 and chad will die to a drone or bullet
and i find that beautiful how war destroys social borders
good for you
for me waiting for all the chads to come back from way limbless or disabled is a pleasure
 
right answer
Ah yes praise me
1787132844666.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top