The average german guy is a f*g

[grey]

There is really only 3 types of german guys

1. The manwhore, alcoholic who goes saufen every summer on malle and behaves like a teenage boy until his late 30ies

2. The queer, vegan, save the planet, man I talk so nonchalant (like a sloth) guy

3. The cringe fat misogynistic incel nazis guy

What am I

 

[eternal love]

3. The cringe fat misogynistic incel nazis guy

the based one

 

[YesIamHuman]

"European" isn't even a meaningfully defined "continent" (it's not even a continent). By that logic, Armenians are "like" Britons. And yes, Armenia, according to the criteria of the EU and Council of Europe is a "European country".

And if you don't accept political definitions, why not?

What?

 

[2Beau]

There is really only 3 types of german guys

1. The manwhore, alcoholic who goes saufen every summer on malle and behaves like a teenage boy until his late 30ies

2. The queer, vegan, save the planet, man I talk so nonchalant (like a sloth) guy

3. The cringe fat misogynistic incel nazis guy

I’m the third category but belgian cool big strong, sexy asf

 

[2Beau]

Italy and the rest of the Mediterranean has a different vibe and culture than other parts of Europe.


Alcoholic, leftist, incel as the three archetypes? Yes it does.

Gabagool

 

[Deleted Member 107512]

Turks are a mix of European, central Asian and Mesopotamian
Some could be majorly or entirely European, some very distant
North Italians would be very close to Germans genetically
Southerners would have some differences as there’s a minor recent North African factor
But southern Italians are still majorly European

1. ALL Turks are PREDOMINANTLY WESTERN EURASIAN and ALL Turks have high Ne. The "CENTRAL ASIAN" (which is largely Western Eurasian) CANNOT be emphasised above their WESTERN EURASIAN ANCESTRY. Where are the high FST values between Turks and "Europeans"? They don't exist? Of course they don't. Genetic distances between Italians (averaged) and Germans is ~0.004 and the same with Turks.

Genetic distance DOES increase based on region because genetics are CLINAL (look it up), but if you think a 0.006 distance between Eastern Turks and Northern Italians is "very distant" oh boy, wait till you see the distances between Sardinians and Latvians.


2. The genetic distance between Germans and Northern Italians ranges from 0.003-0.004. Northern Italians are still largely a mix of "Western Mediterranean" and "Eastern Mediterranean" and are not glorified Germans.


3. This is where "European genetics" falls apart. German "Europeans"? FST values range from ~0.006-0.008. Northern Italian "Europeans"? FST values range from 0.002-0.005. Spanish "Europeans"? 0.003. Are Cypriots "European" or "Middle Eastern"? Either way, 0.000-0.003. What about Russian "Europeans"? 0.01-0.012. Turkish Jewish "European"? 0.001. You're gonna have to define "majorly European". There is NO world that allows Southern Italians and Poles and the EHG heavy Balts/East Slavs to be labelled as "genetically European". On the other hand, you'd BETTER have a DAMN good reason for meaningfully segregating Southern Italians and Azeris genetically.

 

[Balian]

1. ALL Turks are PREDOMINANTLY WESTERN EURASIAN and ALL Turks have high Ne. The "CENTRAL ASIAN" (which is largely Western Eurasian) CANNOT be emphasised above their WESTERN EURASIAN ANCESTRY. Where are the high FST values between Turks and "Europeans"? They don't exist? Of course they don't. Genetic distances between Italians (averaged) and Germans is ~0.004 and the same with Turks.

View attachment 293157

Genetic distance DOES increase based on region because genetics are CLINAL (look it up), but if you think a 0.006 distance between Eastern Turks and Northern Italians is "very distant" oh boy, wait till you see the distances between Sardinians and Latvians.


2. The genetic distance between Germans and Northern Italians ranges from 0.003-0.004. Northern Italians are still largely a mix of "Western Mediterranean" and "Eastern Mediterranean" and are not glorified Germans.


3. This is where "European genetics" falls apart. German "Europeans"? FST values range from ~0.006-0.008. Northern Italian "Europeans"? FST values range from 0.002-0.005. Spanish "Europeans"? 0.003. Are Cypriots "European" or "Middle Eastern"? Either way, 0.000-0.003. What about Russian "Europeans"? 0.01-0.012. Turkish Jewish "European"? 0.001. You're gonna have to define "majorly European". There is NO world that allows Southern Italians and Poles and the EHG heavy Balts/East Slavs to be labelled as "genetically European". On the other hand, you'd BETTER have a DAMN good reason for meaningfully segregating Southern Italians and Azeris genetically.

Didn’t emphasise one over the other, simply said they are a mix of these

Even if genetic distance is 0.003 and not lower, that’s still extremely low, and northern Italians and Germans are very genetically close
Last paragraph is not even understandable

 

[Deleted Member 107512]

Didn’t emphasise one over the other, simply said they are a mix of these

Even if genetic distance is 0.003 and not lower, that’s still extremely low, and northern Italians and Germans are very genetically close
Last paragraph is not even understandable

Guess what the genetic distance between Southern Italians and Turks are? 0.003. Same as Germans vs Northern Italians (it's actually slighly lower). So why are we focusing on Turks as if they're some aberration? No Turkish subpopulation is outside the scope of Western Eurasia. If you can read a basic map and if you understand what CLINES are, you'll see where Italy lies and where Turkey lies and you'll understand that Turkey isn't this alien subpopulation. But you DON'T understand clines. Or you do, but you're selective in understanding them.

"Northern Italy is the closest to Germany/Austria/"Central Europe", so there must be a relationship between the areas!"

"The Ionian Basin, Levantine Basin and Aegean all meet, but damnit, there's a racial barrier!" (There isn't).

Make it make sense.

 

[Balian]

Guess what the genetic distance between Southern Italians and Turks are? 0.003. Same as Germans vs Northern Italians (it's actually slighly lower). So why are we focusing on Turks as if they're some aberration? No Turkish subpopulation is outside the scope of Western Eurasia. If you can read a basic map and if you understand what CLINES are, you'll see where Italy lies and where Turkey lies and you'll understand that Turkey isn't this alien subpopulation. But you DON'T understand clines. Or you do, but you're selective in understanding them.

"Northern Italy is the closest to Germany/Austria/"Central Europe", so there must be a relationship between the areas!"

"The Ionian Basin, Levantine Basin and Aegean all meet, but damnit, there's a racial barrier!" (There isn't).

Make it make sense.

I told you, and you confirmed it
Because some Turks are practically Europeans genetically as their population is a mix of Mesopotamian,European, and central Asian

 

[eternal love]

Turks are a mix of European, central Asian and Mesopotamian
Some could be majorly or entirely European, some very distant
North Italians would be very close to Germans genetically
Southerners would have some differences as there’s a minor recent North African factor
But southern Italians are still majorly European

chill bro that subhuman will say you that europeans/whites don't exist using his chatgpt propaganda