The average height of people has increased by 10cm over the last 100 years. Will people be giants in the future?

[Pavel]

In the USA, the average man is about 177cm (in the EU about the same), taller than anyone in the Netherlands (182.5cm), but there is an opinion that acceleration has already ended, is this so (and what can serve as a limiting point of growth?)

 

[RainbowDash]

by 2124 yall be tall chads! It's not over!!

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

by 2124 yall be tall chads! It's not over!!

Tall chads will be giant chads


We will prolly perish before 2124 too

 

[Pavel]

Tall chads will be giant chads


We will prolly perish before 2124 too

I think plastic surgery in the year 2124 will be so developed that everyone will be able to become an 8 ft 9/10 chad

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

I think plastic surgery in the year 2124 will be so developed that everyone will be able to become an 8 ft 9/10 chad

Chad value = 0

Parsonality will only matter

 

[Pavel]

Chad value = 0

Parsonality will only matter

hah yeah

 

[RainbowDash]

I think plastic surgery in the year 2124 will be so developed that everyone will be able to become an 8 ft 9/10 chad

Which phenos do you think will die out?

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

Which phenos do you think will die out?

Indians and asians will takeover the world by then

So prolly some white phenos

 

[RainbowDash]

Indians and asians will takeover the world by then

So prolly some white phenos

Nahh some east Asian phenos too

 

[sigma]

if everyone is tall then nobody is chad height
because women will also be tall and being say 6'5 in a certain year will be average
so now 7ft+ tall is ideal
still nobody is chad then

 

[sigma]

also in developing countries like USA + in Europe, the acceleration is slowing, so we may eventually reach a peak in average height

 

[Whitepill]

also in developing countries like USA + in Europe, the acceleration is slowing, so we may eventually reach a peak in average height

that could be realistic

 

[Whitepill]

i doubt it though once we finally adjust to height

 

[RainbowDash]

if everyone is tall then nobody is chad height
because women will also be tall and being say 6'5 in a certain year will be average
so now 7ft+ tall is ideal
still nobody is chad then

does 7ft+ even look good? 2124 manlets will become the chads

 

[sigma]

does 7ft+ even look good? 2124 manlets will become the chads

its about proportions

 

[osteochondromyxoma]

In the USA, the average man is about 177cm (in the EU about the same), taller than anyone in the Netherlands (182.5cm), but there is an opinion that acceleration has already ended, is this so (and what can serve as a limiting point of growth?)

Future technology and furthering social norms may cause the average height ot inflate due to easier access of technologies and methods of gaining height. LL and HGH during early years seems to be the only current methods that work, but in the future it's a possibility we can open growth plates or further intervention for children.

 

[n9wiff]

In the USA, the average man is about 177cm (in the EU about the same), taller than anyone in the Netherlands (182.5cm), but there is an opinion that acceleration has already ended, is this so (and what can serve as a limiting point of growth?)

There will be a limit obviously


This increase will be much faster in poorer countries

 

[Wilk]

There will be a limit obviously


This increase will be much faster in poorer countries

quiet the opposite, the most superficial changes happen in the most economic safe places.

When you decrease one of the metrics of sexual reprodusion such as money, you make the others be more decisive. As if you made all the runners have the same food source, what defines they performance is their height, muscle dna and so on so on...


You can see, for example, photos of Russia prior to the economic stability of socialism and after..., they gone from shity looking peasants to quiet attractive people. The same happens between rich communities in poor countries as time passes. AND SO ON SO ON

 

[n9wiff]

quiet the opposite, the most superficial changes happen in the most economic safe places.

When you decrease one of the metrics of sexual reprodusion such as money, you make the others be more decisive. As if you made all the runners have the same food source, what defines they performance is their height, muscle dna and so on so on...


You can see, for example, photos of Russia prior to the economic stability of socialism and after..., they gone from shity looking peasants to quiet attractive people. The same happens between rich communities in poor countries as time passes. AND SO ON SO ON

Poorer countries get QOL increase faster such as mine

So height disparity between two generations is greater

 

[Wilk]

Poorer countries get QOL increase faster such as mine

So height disparity between two generations is greater

Soo as their wealthy increases their genetic potential of height increases due to more nutrients. Makes sense

 

[n9wiff]

Soo as their wealthy increases their genetic potential of height increases due to more nutrients. Makes sense

And living conditions yes

 

[Whitepill]

And living conditions yes

living conditions often are a result of wealth but yeah

 

[Clone]

Humanity is at its peak height wise

 

[Whitepill]

Humanity is at its peak height wise

It will go up a bit longer then crash