Join 49,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

The Paradox of the Strong and the Weak

BlendedBlade🧿

🧿
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Jun 3, 2025
Messages
13,139
Solutions
2
Time Online
21d 9h
Reputation
36,233
Here’s a pattern I’ve noticed over the years:


Men born with natural advantages — exceptional looks, social charisma, and an easy time with women — rarely end up dominating the hierarchy in the long run.

They reach a decent position early, but their lack of necessity to push further leaves them stagnant. Comfort breeds complacency.


In contrast, some of the weakest men — those with poor genetics, social awkwardness, or no initial advantages — are forced to fight for every inch.

Out of necessity, they spend years improving their physique, style, income, and social intelligence.

Over time, they surpass those who started ahead of them.


The strong are softened by ease. The weak are sharpened by struggle.
 
to an extent, you’re correct. most people who start off strong simply don’t know where to go from there hence why they display long-term decline
 
BlendedBlade
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top