Join 65,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Discussion The problem with "there are no morals" faggots

Penalizer69

Genocidalmaniac764
Contributor
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
May 15, 2025
Messages
32,632
Solutions
24
Time Online
22d 37m
Reputation
126,194
These people, for whatever reason, seem to think "normies" (non giga autist larpers) morality revolves around the law. That if something is illegal we see it as bad, and if something is legal it's completely fine. This obviously isn't true, morality isn't black and white, there are times when murder is bad, and other where it's okay or even a net positive. There are times where stealing is bad, or a necessity.

Yes the reason most people don't commit most crimes is because they don't think it's worth it, but that doesn't mean they're "immoral" they just never had the morals you plastered onto them in the first place. It's also important to note this - there's a difference between impulse and desire. If I get an impulse to punch someone out of a split second of rage, it doesn't mean I genuinely desire to do so. Sometimes people get horrible and bizarre urges, it doesn't strip them of their morality. Normal people don't want to do most heinous unforgivable acts EVER (I.e r**e, pedophilia, etc.) Because that's just not how people are hardwired.

Imo if you do certain things it's because YOURE hardwired wrong, this has been proven time and time again. Cope all you want, you're not better.

My thought when it comes to morality is this.

Why do you want to do something?
What is it you want to do?
Are the people effected innocent?
Is there some kind of greater good achieved by this action?
Basically a very machiavellian outlook

And whether you like it or not, morals do exist innately. Animals do have "morals"

Don't try to label me as a subjective moralist or anything else, they're all retarded to me. I'm something entirely different.

anyone who believes in a lack of morals is a fucking sheep who is (ironically enough) the exact kind of person they're shaming. It's projection at its finest
 
Register to hide this ad

~—• @Marlonmogsyouhaha •—~​


These people, for whatever reason, seem to think "normies" (non giga autist larpers) morality revolves around the law. That if something is illegal we see it as bad, and if something is legal it's completely fine. This obviously isn't true, morality isn't black and white, there are times when murder is bad, and other where it's okay or even a net positive. There are times where stealing is bad, or a necessity.

Yes the reason most people don't commit most crimes is because they don't think it's worth it, but that doesn't mean they're "immoral" they just never had the morals you plastered onto them in the first place. It's also important to note this - there's a difference between impulse and desire. If I get an impulse to punch someone out of a split second of rage, it doesn't mean I genuinely desire to do so. Sometimes people get horrible and bizarre urges, it doesn't strip them of their morality. Normal people don't want to do most heinous unforgivable acts EVER (I.e r**e, pedophilia, etc.) Because that's just not how people are hardwired.

Imo if you do certain things it's because YOURE hardwired wrong, this has been proven time and time again. Cope all you want, you're not better.

My thought when it comes to morality is this.

Why do you want to do something?
What is it you want to do?
Are the people effected innocent?
Is there some kind of greater good achieved by this action?
Basically a very machiavellian outlook

And whether you like it or not, morals do exist innately. Animals do have "morals"

Don't try to label me as a subjective moralist or anything else, they're all retarded to me. I'm something entirely different.

anyone who believes in a lack of morals is a fucking sheep who is (ironically enough) the exact kind of person they're shaming. It's projection at its finest

Your other thread was good this is just copypasta chatgpt slop tbh.
 
These people, for whatever reason, seem to think "normies" (non giga autist larpers) morality revolves around the law. That if something is illegal we see it as bad, and if something is legal it's completely fine. This obviously isn't true, morality isn't black and white, there are times when murder is bad, and other where it's okay or even a net positive. There are times where stealing is bad, or a necessity.

Yes the reason most people don't commit most crimes is because they don't think it's worth it, but that doesn't mean they're "immoral" they just never had the morals you plastered onto them in the first place. It's also important to note this - there's a difference between impulse and desire. If I get an impulse to punch someone out of a split second of rage, it doesn't mean I genuinely desire to do so. Sometimes people get horrible and bizarre urges, it doesn't strip them of their morality. Normal people don't want to do most heinous unforgivable acts EVER (I.e r**e, pedophilia, etc.) Because that's just not how people are hardwired.

Imo if you do certain things it's because YOURE hardwired wrong, this has been proven time and time again. Cope all you want, you're not better.

My thought when it comes to morality is this.

Why do you want to do something?
What is it you want to do?
Are the people effected innocent?
Is there some kind of greater good achieved by this action?
Basically a very machiavellian outlook

And whether you like it or not, morals do exist innately. Animals do have "morals"

Don't try to label me as a subjective moralist or anything else, they're all retarded to me. I'm something entirely different.

anyone who believes in a lack of morals is a fucking sheep who is (ironically enough) the exact kind of person they're shaming. It's projection at its finest
That I can get behind.
 
These people, for whatever reason, seem to think "normies" (non giga autist larpers) morality revolves around the law. That if something is illegal we see it as bad, and if something is legal it's completely fine. This obviously isn't true, morality isn't black and white, there are times when murder is bad, and other where it's okay or even a net positive. There are times where stealing is bad, or a necessity.

Yes the reason most people don't commit most crimes is because they don't think it's worth it, but that doesn't mean they're "immoral" they just never had the morals you plastered onto them in the first place. It's also important to note this - there's a difference between impulse and desire. If I get an impulse to punch someone out of a split second of rage, it doesn't mean I genuinely desire to do so. Sometimes people get horrible and bizarre urges, it doesn't strip them of their morality. Normal people don't want to do most heinous unforgivable acts EVER (I.e r**e, pedophilia, etc.) Because that's just not how people are hardwired.

Imo if you do certain things it's because YOURE hardwired wrong, this has been proven time and time again. Cope all you want, you're not better.

My thought when it comes to morality is this.

Why do you want to do something?
What is it you want to do?
Are the people effected innocent?
Is there some kind of greater good achieved by this action?
Basically a very machiavellian outlook

And whether you like it or not, morals do exist innately. Animals do have "morals"

Don't try to label me as a subjective moralist or anything else, they're all retarded to me. I'm something entirely different.

anyone who believes in a lack of morals is a fucking sheep who is (ironically enough) the exact kind of person they're shaming. It's projection at its finest
I’ll read later because It’s not the time of day I use my brain
 

~—• @YourSkinOnMySkin •—~​


These people, for whatever reason, seem to think "normies" (non giga autist larpers) morality revolves around the law. That if something is illegal we see it as bad, and if something is legal it's completely fine. This obviously isn't true, morality isn't black and white, there are times when murder is bad, and other where it's okay or even a net positive. There are times where stealing is bad, or a necessity.

Yes the reason most people don't commit most crimes is because they don't think it's worth it, but that doesn't mean they're "immoral" they just never had the morals you plastered onto them in the first place. It's also important to note this - there's a difference between impulse and desire. If I get an impulse to punch someone out of a split second of rage, it doesn't mean I genuinely desire to do so. Sometimes people get horrible and bizarre urges, it doesn't strip them of their morality. Normal people don't want to do most heinous unforgivable acts EVER (I.e r**e, pedophilia, etc.) Because that's just not how people are hardwired.

Imo if you do certain things it's because YOURE hardwired wrong, this has been proven time and time again. Cope all you want, you're not better.

My thought when it comes to morality is this.

Why do you want to do something?
What is it you want to do?
Are the people effected innocent?
Is there some kind of greater good achieved by this action?
Basically a very machiavellian outlook

And whether you like it or not, morals do exist innately. Animals do have "morals"

Don't try to label me as a subjective moralist or anything else, they're all retarded to me. I'm something entirely different.

anyone who believes in a lack of morals is a fucking sheep who is (ironically enough) the exact kind of person they're shaming. It's projection at its finest

Yo get @YourSkinOnMySkin in here.

Thoughts?
 

~—• @Marlonmogsyouhaha •—~​


According to you
Murdering innocents for the greater good = bad
Being friends with a cult member, masochist abuser for no gain = good

Um but the cult members and masochist abuser has aura and its a cool aesthetic 😎 dark academia and all that jazz - rad probably
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top