- Joined
- May 15, 2025
- Messages
- 32,632
- Solutions
- 24
- Time Online
- 22d 37m
- Reputation
- 126,194
These people, for whatever reason, seem to think "normies" (non giga autist larpers) morality revolves around the law. That if something is illegal we see it as bad, and if something is legal it's completely fine. This obviously isn't true, morality isn't black and white, there are times when murder is bad, and other where it's okay or even a net positive. There are times where stealing is bad, or a necessity.
Yes the reason most people don't commit most crimes is because they don't think it's worth it, but that doesn't mean they're "immoral" they just never had the morals you plastered onto them in the first place. It's also important to note this - there's a difference between impulse and desire. If I get an impulse to punch someone out of a split second of rage, it doesn't mean I genuinely desire to do so. Sometimes people get horrible and bizarre urges, it doesn't strip them of their morality. Normal people don't want to do most heinous unforgivable acts EVER (I.e r**e, pedophilia, etc.) Because that's just not how people are hardwired.
Imo if you do certain things it's because YOURE hardwired wrong, this has been proven time and time again. Cope all you want, you're not better.
My thought when it comes to morality is this.
Why do you want to do something?
What is it you want to do?
Are the people effected innocent?
Is there some kind of greater good achieved by this action?
Basically a very machiavellian outlook
And whether you like it or not, morals do exist innately. Animals do have "morals"
Don't try to label me as a subjective moralist or anything else, they're all retarded to me. I'm something entirely different.
anyone who believes in a lack of morals is a fucking sheep who is (ironically enough) the exact kind of person they're shaming. It's projection at its finest
Yes the reason most people don't commit most crimes is because they don't think it's worth it, but that doesn't mean they're "immoral" they just never had the morals you plastered onto them in the first place. It's also important to note this - there's a difference between impulse and desire. If I get an impulse to punch someone out of a split second of rage, it doesn't mean I genuinely desire to do so. Sometimes people get horrible and bizarre urges, it doesn't strip them of their morality. Normal people don't want to do most heinous unforgivable acts EVER (I.e r**e, pedophilia, etc.) Because that's just not how people are hardwired.
Imo if you do certain things it's because YOURE hardwired wrong, this has been proven time and time again. Cope all you want, you're not better.
My thought when it comes to morality is this.
Why do you want to do something?
What is it you want to do?
Are the people effected innocent?
Is there some kind of greater good achieved by this action?
Basically a very machiavellian outlook
And whether you like it or not, morals do exist innately. Animals do have "morals"
Don't try to label me as a subjective moralist or anything else, they're all retarded to me. I'm something entirely different.
anyone who believes in a lack of morals is a fucking sheep who is (ironically enough) the exact kind of person they're shaming. It's projection at its finest
