The trolly problem is lowkey retarded

[catlady]

If you kill only one person you would have manually changed the direction of the train so you would have chosen to kill the person. It is the most logical answer. Why do some people argue that it is immoral to do so?

The other option would be killing more people but not doing anything so basically you didn’t kill them cause it wasn’t your fault but it was tho????

 

[lowkeydeadoutside]

how about I kill everyone then myself

 

[changfromkk]

 

[BigDihDiddy ⚦]

If you kill only one person you would have manually changed the direction of the train so you would have chosen to kill the person. It is the most logical answer. Why do some people argue that it is immoral to do so?

The other option would be killing more people but not doing anything so basically you didn’t kill them cause it wasn’t your fault but it was tho????

It depends who was less subhuman tbh if it was Stacy tied up i would run over the 5 subhumans if it was 5 stacies and a chud I’d run over the chud

 

[Pinksunglasses]

If you kill only one person you would have manually changed the direction of the train so you would have chosen to kill the person. It is the most logical answer. Why do some people argue that it is immoral to do so?

The other option would be killing more people but not doing anything so basically you didn’t kill them cause it wasn’t your fault but it was tho????View attachment 369149

How DIGGAs feel after coming up with this atrocious take but it’s ok bc they have sparkly user

 

[The Centipede]

They give us these Quant questions, but they conveniently never mention morality haha.

 

[The Centipede]

How DIGGAs feel after coming up with this atrocious take but it’s ok bc they have sparkly user

View attachment 369150

They used to have shit like this in the Warner Bros store, in the 90s .