Serious the use of nudity in art is oversexualized

[vamp]

nudity can be the most pure form of art there is when you remove the sexual parts of it,

it is a shame many people go out of their way to destroy/shame the artists who used still use this medium to display their messege.

a good use of nudity in art would be yayoi kazuma which i went to visit with my parents,

i think its sad that its looked down on as a form of art.

 

[dontcallthemfoidsbro]

Yes i agree. Everyone is nude in their natural state. Sex isn't the only time one is unclothed so I dont understand why being naked has to be inherently sexual. Really, portraying the human body as it is naturally is quite a logical step in art.

 

[███]

high iq thread

 

[Br4va]

Ehhh I disagree

 

[vamp]

Ehhh I disagree

how so

 

[Br4va]

how so

I just feel like it’s not necessary. There is a reason we evolved from that. Back in the day people treated nudity differently and all those pieces of art were really only shared and made for the higher ups.

 

[vamp]

I just feel like it’s not necessary. There is a reason we evolved from that. Back in the day people treated nudity differently and all those pieces of art were really only shared and made for the higher ups.

i know what you mean, one example would be sussane im bade, its a biblical story that was used for people to have nude material.

this just proves my point though, nudity in art should be used to display freedom and other things.

not to be used in a lustful way

 

[xoxo]

I agree

 

[Carcinogenic]

nudity is natural and has a very long history in art, but some ppl cannot handle it and go bonkers as soon as they see a dick,nipple or vagina