Info The wrong Looksmaxxers

[Wilk]

If you looksmaxx for woman, you are doing it wrong.

There are guys out there killing themselves because they think their whole value as a man is determined by the woman visual sexual attraction market.
Men is judged by his performance in activities that would enrich the woman he wants..., if his actions are validated by woman...,

The value of a men is being calculated based on his pleasantness to woman.

His job reason, his opinions..., he should not live for others, but for himself.

When you see the world in the lenses of dressing yourself to please woman, you had become slave of their will.

When you dont do the hobbys you like or abdicates of your pleasures to please woman, you became slave of their will.

When you accept being humiliated by others for wherever reason, you just lost your rights of dignity and your self-respect.

A beta for looksmaxxers are ugly looking people. A real beta is someone who lives in hope of pleasuring other people instead of himself.

Fuck Yeah.

 

[sigma]

yes but no
organisms purpose biologically is to survive and reproduce
thus we biologically are wired to think this way and want to have sex with an attractive woman (good genes) and have a good life (friends, status, comfortablity, wealth, will help survival)
but it is important to do it for yourself because while humans do want survival and reproduction, they are also very complex. so both matter

 

[Wilk]

yes but no
organisms purpose biologically is to survive and reproduce
thus we biologically are wired to think this way and want to have sex with an attractive woman (good genes) and have a good life (friends, status, comfortablity, wealth, will help survival)
but it is important to do it for yourself because while humans do want survival and reproduction, they are also very complex. so both matter

There are no natural purpose, only chains of physical reaction.
Humanity is characterized by its distinguishment ability of being self conscientious. Conscientious is not the complete absence of instincts and emotions but rather a meta instinct and meta emotion able to administrate those more animalesque ones. It is our ability to transcend, in some level, the animal will such as reproduction, and thats part of the reason why we dont act inconsequently.

It has being catalogued metrics of happyness in a life, and while money were somewhere in the third place at an amount that were close to 50k a mouth as the most efficient quantity to increase it, the main factor were the quality of general relationships you have with people.

At the me time, however, the main cause of unhappiness were also the invertion of those metrics, and that means the poor quality of interactions that you have with people is the main cause of unhappiness and suicide.

It were searching for the most advanced sociological studies that i found a disturbing fact: all of them mounted a different manner to describe the reality of the dynamics between individual and the rest os society, but they all saw the same: the individual is controled to obey the group via, almost only, negative stimulu.

As you may know thanks to behavioral psychology, a individual is controlled either by positive (gifts of pleasure) or negative interactions (suffering).

To put that the individual is mostly being afflicted with negative interaction means that a social landscape, filled with limitations, social pressures, ideological wars, conflict of interests, sadistics, deadlines..., is always inflicting the promisse of sofering if the individual dont be their little slaves. And while a individual could try to be free in a social landscape, he would be attacked and the dynamics of transformations from behavioral psycology would act upon him till he changed his ways.

The conclusion is clear: staying away from people most of the time is the most effective way of decreasing emotional unhappiness. Whille the individual may analyse scenarios were he would have positive interaction and choose to participate only in those (and the ones where he must in order to survive even if they are negative).

So, the simple maximization of GPSI (general positive social interaction) concludes mostly solitude and minimally social presence.








Now, in the matter of reproduction, the calculus would also conclude to participate only in those evens that are positive. Long and medium term relationships are negative (for black pill arguments) while short term is the safest to have a positive interaction as long as you are in the position to have it (beauty or social status if it is a golddigger, or just the boldness to date a crazy girl...).

However, if you dont like short term relations (like me) then the most racional act - for now - is to simply avoid it.







And thats why i disagree with your point of view, we may verry well surprass our biological atractions that cause us more harm, like a insect that flies in the direction of light but dies touching the fire that emanates the light, when we get conciencious we are able to transcend those traps of biology and society, by the power of thinking for oursels and not bowing to the social pressure

 

[Harvey929]

im deadass starting to think your gay

 

[sigma]

There are no natural purpose, only chains of physical reaction.
Humanity is characterized by its distinguishment ability of being self conscientious. Conscientious is not the complete absence of instincts and emotions but rather a meta instinct and meta emotion able to administrate those more animalesque ones. It is our ability to transcend, in some level, the animal will such as reproduction, and thats part of the reason why we dont act inconsequently.

It has being catalogued metrics of happyness in a life, and while money were somewhere in the third place at an amount that were close to 50k a mouth as the most efficient quantity to increase it, the main factor were the quality of general relationships you have with people.

At the me time, however, the main cause of unhappiness were also the invertion of those metrics, and that means the poor quality of interactions that you have with people is the main cause of unhappiness and suicide.

It were searching for the most advanced sociological studies that i found a disturbing fact: all of them mounted a different manner to describe the reality of the dynamics between individual and the rest os society, but they all saw the same: the individual is controled to obey the group via, almost only, negative stimulu.

As you may know thanks to behavioral psychology, a individual is controlled either by positive (gifts of pleasure) or negative interactions (suffering).

To put that the individual is mostly being afflicted with negative interaction means that a social landscape, filled with limitations, social pressures, ideological wars, conflict of interests, sadistics, deadlines..., is always inflicting the promisse of sofering if the individual dont be their little slaves. And while a individual could try to be free in a social landscape, he would be attacked and the dynamics of transformations from behavioral psycology would act upon him till he changed his ways.

The conclusion is clear: staying away from people most of the time is the most effective way of decreasing emotional unhappiness. Whille the individual may analyse scenarios were he would have positive interaction and choose to participate only in those (and the ones where he must in order to survive even if they are negative).

So, the simple maximization of GPSI (general positive social interaction) concludes mostly solitude and minimally social presence.








Now, in the matter of reproduction, the calculus would also conclude to participate only in those evens that are positive. Long and medium term relationships are negative (for black pill arguments) while short term is the safest to have a positive interaction as long as you are in the position to have it (beauty or social status if it is a golddigger, or just the boldness to date a crazy girl...).

However, if you dont like short term relations (like me) then the most racional act - for now - is to simply avoid it.







And thats why i disagree with your point of view, we may verry well surprass our biological atractions that cause us more harm, like a insect that flies in the direction of light but dies touching the fire that emanates the light, when we get conciencious we are able to transcend those traps of biology and society, by the power of thinking for oursels and not bowing to the social pressure

we are intelligent, yes. but we are also still animals. smart animals.
and being a loner is not good. people need relationships. you dont need fame and to be super popular. but humans need familial, romantic, and friend relations

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

If you looksmaxx for woman, you are doing it wrong.

There are guys out there killing themselves because they think their whole value as a man is determined by the woman visual sexual attraction market.
Men is judged by his performance in activities that would enrich the woman he wants..., if his actions are validated by woman...,

The value of a men is being calculated based on his pleasantness to woman.

His job reason, his opinions..., he should not live for others, but for himself.

When you see the world in the lenses of dressing yourself to please woman, you had become slave of their will.

When you dont do the hobbys you like or abdicates of your pleasures to please woman, you became slave of their will.

When you accept being humiliated by others for wherever reason, you just lost your rights of dignity and your self-respect.

A beta for looksmaxxers are ugly looking people. A real beta is someone who lives in hope of pleasuring other people instead of himself.

f**k Yeah.

Redpill cope dnr

 

[Wilk]

we are intelligent, yes. but we are also still animals. smart animals.
and being a loner is not good. people need relationships. you dont need fame and to be super popular. but humans need familial, romantic, and friend relations

Shure, problem is when those relationships give more harm then good, hence why it is preferable to stay away from almost all relationships while participating on those that are the most necessary or that are 100% positive.

Because intimate relationships such as dating are mostly bad (blackpill arguments) and the sexual needs can be accomplished alone, it becomes ignorable.

Colleagues are imersed in office politics, they do harm. The most efficient is having those 3 distant friends you can meet from time to time.

but even woman dont fell like dating or something when they can get validation with social media. We can get some social needs using just the internet, specifying even more how we socialize, making it much more prone to being positive then in the outside world.

so dating, kids and fake colleague friends are something of the past now. All you need is in your phone and computer. People just need to work and buy groceries where they have to stand in social places

 

[Wilk]

Redpill cope dnr

black pill cope

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

black pill cope

So i should looksmax for myself

 

[Wilk]

So i should looksmax for myself

You should looksmax only to get specific strategic social benefits that you particularly want. Mostly, social interactions are negative and should be avoided, together with the concept of trying to obey social pressure for being welcome everywhere wich is a negative interaction, i will probably explain it better in a thread.

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

You should looksmax only to get specific strategic social benefits that you particularly want. Mostly, social interactions are negative and should be avoided, together with the concept of trying to obey social pressure for being welcome everywhere wich is a negative interaction, i will probably explain it better in a thread.

What is the difference in looksmaxxing for girls and whatever u said

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

You should looksmax only to get specific strategic social benefits that you particularly want. Mostly, social interactions are negative and should be avoided, together with the concept of trying to obey social pressure for being welcome everywhere wich is a negative interaction, i will probably explain it better in a thread.

Social interactions are bad only if u are ugly and neurodivergent

 

[Wilk]

Social interactions are bad only if u are ugly and neurodivergent

common problems:
1- sadistic people
2- inside office politics wars
3- manipulators...
4- Uneducated people.
5- when you have something to do at your job, you suffer of anxiety in the space time between receiving the order and completing it.
6- people of tribes that are mean to people who aren't part of their tribe
7- the danger of criminals when walking in the streets

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

common problems:
1- sadistic people
2- inside office politics wars
3- manipulators...
4- Uneducated people.
5- when you have something to do at your job, you suffer of anxiety in the space time between receiving the order and completing it.
6- people of tribes that are mean to people who aren't part of their tribe
7- the danger of criminals when walking in the streets

Tribes are indeed very common
I just hoohoo haahaa boogachooga video of America



And most of things can be avoided if u are high iq and nt
Except criminals

 

[Wilk]

Tribes are indeed very common
I just hoohoo haahaa boogachooga video of America



And most of things can be avoided if u are high iq and nt
Except criminals

Most things can, indeed, be avoided via social isolation

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

Most things can, indeed, be avoided via social isolation

More things can, indeed , be avoided via killing oneself

 

[Wilk]

More things can, indeed , be avoided via killing oneself

They could, but i am unable to do it. I also have plans.

That was kinda aggressive so i tell you to fuck yourself

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

They could, but i am unable to do it. I also have plans.

That was kinda aggressive so i tell you to f**k yourself

I tell u to stay in ur basement for all of ur life

 

[Wilk]

I tell u to stay in ur basement for all of ur life

As much as can, indeed

 

[sigma]

Shure, problem is when those relationships give more harm then good, hence why it is preferable to stay away from almost all relationships while participating on those that are the most necessary or that are 100% positive.

Because intimate relationships such as dating are mostly bad (blackpill arguments) and the sexual needs can be accomplished alone, it becomes ignorable.

Colleagues are imersed in office politics, they do harm. The most efficient is having those 3 distant friends you can meet from time to time.

but even woman dont fell like dating or something when they can get validation with social media. We can get some social needs using just the internet, specifying even more how we socialize, making it much more prone to being positive then in the outside world.

so dating, kids and fake colleague friends are something of the past now. All you need is in your phone and computer. People just need to work and buy groceries where they have to stand in social places

damn
well i feel bad that its hard for you to experience a good relationship with friends. i mean, it is hard for me too, but i think its worth it even when not 100% poisitve/necessary