Join 65,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Theory on thumbulling cause im bored

RecessionGod

n1gger
Banned
Joined
Dec 13, 2025
Messages
132
Solutions
1
Time Online
14h 46m
Reputation
141
Location
basement
What I'm about to say is purely theoretical and empirical; there are no randomized studies to back it up. If it convinces you, follow it; if not, simply ignore it

Okay, let's look at this study because it's very interesting: "Use of a Modified Expander During Rapid Maxillary Expansion in Adults: An In Vitro and Finite Element Study." In this study, they used the skulls of 70-year-old women with a completely closed midpalatal suture (confirmed by CBCT, although it's often still slightly open, as CBCT isn't precise, but it gives me a preliminary picture of the suture's condition). A Hyrax device was used, but instead of attaching it to the teeth, they did something clever: they cut off its ends, then placed it on the midpalatal suture and secured it with very small screws (not like MSE, just small screws as a method of fixation). Then they activated the device 0.2 mm every 20 seconds for four activations, meaning the force gradually increased until the suture was completely separated. However, the force required to fully open the suture was only 85 N (the opening was confirmed by CBCT). Now look at the image below; you'll see that the force The tension is very localized, almost at the mid-palatal suture. Now, this is very interesting, so the idea is as follows: First, you must perform thumb pulling correctly (the thumbs must be very close to the suture, as I explained last time, so that the force is concentrated directly on the mid-palatal suture).

1770720110332.webp

1770720120142.webp

1770720131399.webp

1770720139774.webp


Then, do a very long round, 1-3 minutes, at full force. The combined force of the thumbs will be at least 200N, which is much higher than in the study. It's true that some force will be absorbed by the soft tissues, but it will be very small, and we will closely mimic the device they used in the study. Also, according to this source: "Development of a novel histological and histomorphometric evaluation protocol for a standardized description of the mid-palatal suture - An ex vivo study"

Individuals aged 70 had a tightly packed suture with few blood vessels, while young adults aged 20-30 had a much wider mid-palatal suture with many blood vessels. In short... In our case, the suture in the study was almost completely closed, but ours is still almost completely open, meaning the force needed to open it is much less. It's literally impossible not to be able to open the suture in the middle of your palate using your thumbs (provided both thumbs are directly next to the suture). What I'm trying to say is that at the beginning of each day, do a long thumb-pulling session (1-3 minutes) with maximum force, and then for the rest of the day do short sessions of 5-10 seconds to provide strong, periodic stimulation for suture growth.


According to this study “ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4430698/“ even one thumb can give more than 110n in lateral pulling
 
Register to hide this ad

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top