Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

they should make contributor more exclusive

sign the petition for it by Golding this
The issue is with recognizing actual contributions instead of slop.

I think everyone in this thread is making a mistake by thinking contributor should be an ultra exclusive and rare thing. This site isn't org and it's wrong to compare it to orgs contributor system.

A contributor, by definition, is someone who contributes, and that can even be one good thread for all i care. It doesn't need to be something extraordinary, it should just be a means of thanking someone for making the site better.

But contributor isn't handed out by contributions, instead being given for a set number of "high effort" threads - which most of the time is slop that nobody actually reads (and 95% of the time is AI generated). This is mainly an issue because people aren't actually trying to contribute, but just putting out random threads for the badge.

Another point that is relevant to this, is that people seem to not recognize the difference between effort and value. Just because a thread took a lot of effort, doesn't mean it's valuable or contributes anything. I might make a 100000 word guide on how to make pottery out of dogshit, and not get contributor, so i don't get why it's not the same with meaningless looksmaxing threads. A thread should be seen as valuable and spark discussion instead of just being "high effort".

@Dean @Randomized An easy way to fix this would be by personally reviewing the users account, and figure out whether they actually care about the site, or just post AI slop for updoots and badges.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top