Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

🎄 Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members! 🎄

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

this is why europeans are the true Israelites

Deleted Member 60079

Deleted Member 60079

Thumb has ascended , cant stop the mog
Reputable
Established ★★
Joined
Feb 6, 2025
Messages
6,804
Reputation
17,263
1740002529008.png

“Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire:” Lamentations 4:7:
 
Register to hide this ad
snufkin said:
Humans are a hybridisation of multiple different humanoids, we're not all just homo sapains
Click to expand...
Shit you're right I kinda forgot about that. Especially europeans and Asians. There's a lot of inter species admixtures.
 
Whitepill said:
More cope tbb
Click to expand...
any proof of them being isrealiteds? every description of Israelites is of pale, light featured people, and it was prophesied that they would find a new home in the north

“In those days the people of Judah will join the people of Israel, and together they will come from a northern land to the land I gave your ancestors as an inheritance.” Jer. 3:18
not to mention all of Paul's letter were written to europeans
 
N30N said:
Shit you're right I kinda forgot about that. Especially europeans and Asians. There's a lot of inter species admixtures.
Click to expand...
It's with all of us, Europeans are homosapians, cromagnid, and Neanderthal. Asians are Neanderthal, homosapians and Denisovan, and africans are homo sapian, Neanderthal and a ghost dna
 
snufkin said:
This doesn't follow any of what we know about prehistoric human migration
Click to expand...
Christ was very specific when instructing the Apostles were to go and where they were to travel to. Why then did the Apostles travel to Europe? Why did they not travel to China or Africa?

“But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Matthew 15:24
 
notsocommonthumb said:
Christ was very specific when instructing the Apostles were to go and where they were to travel to. Why then did the Apostles travel to Europe? Why did they not travel to China or Africa?

“But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Matthew 15:24
Click to expand...
You didn't even touch on what I said?
 
notsocommonthumb said:
wdym? its common knowledge that the 10 tribes of Israel migrated to europe, this is not prehistoric, this is during the time of the apostles
Click to expand...
Yeah the diagram makes no sense as it says scythia is descended from those tribes when they're a turkic group no a iranian group.

It then proceeds to say scythia goes in to the balkans and the Baltic coast when they never reached that far.

It then proceeds to talk about how pre anglo saxon Britons are from the Mediterranean which is completely and utterly false and is completely rebuttaled by dna testing

Also it says people from Denmark went to Ireland when thats false, Danes went to England while Norwegians went to Scotland and Ireland.

Also I imagine Celtica is meant to be the Celtic homeland ? Well that's false as northern France is the actual homeland of the celts.

It also says that Denmark had received people from Italy? This is false aswell it's only received people from the east and north never from Italy.
 
snufkin said:
Yeah the diagram makes no sense as it says scythia is descended from those tribes when they're a turkic group no a iranian group.
Click to expand...
the Scythians were an Indo-Iranian group not Turkic. The Turkic migration happened much later.
snufkin said:
It then proceeds to say scythia goes in to the balkans and the Baltic coast when they never reached that far.
Click to expand...
They did invade Thrace and parts of the Balkans.
snufkin said:
It then proceeds to talk about how pre anglo saxon Britons are from the Mediterranean which is completely and utterly false and is completely rebuttaled by dna testing
Click to expand...
There was migration from the Mediterranean to Britain
snufkin said:
Also it says people from Denmark went to Ireland when thats false, Danes went to England while Norwegians went to Scotland and Ireland.
Click to expand...
The distinction isnt absolute.
snufkin said:
Also I imagine Celtica is meant to be the Celtic homeland ? Well that's false as northern France is the actual homeland of the celts.
Click to expand...
the map is referring to a later pan-Celtic region not the origin
snufkin said:
It also says that Denmark had received people from Italy? This is false aswell it's only received people from the east and north never from Italy.
Click to expand...
you do not know what the term "lost" means? this is not a 100% accurate map, anyway, the Apocrypha which describes the migration of the ten tribes of Israel was removed in the 17th century because it has the migrations of the Israelites that align perfectly with the migrations of the Caucasians.

not to mention youre dismissing the depictions of the Israelites, which were pale and light featured individuals

Lamenation 4:7-The Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of samphire.
 
notsocommonthumb said:
the Scythians were an Indo-Iranian group not Turkic. The Turkic migration happened much later.

They did invade Thrace and parts of the Balkans.

There was migration from the Mediterranean to Britain

The distinction isnt absolute.

the map is referring to a later pan-Celtic region not the origin

you do not know what the term "lost" means? this is not a 100% accurate map, anyway, the Apocrypha which describes the migration of the ten tribes of Israel was removed in the 17th century because it has the migrations of the Israelites that align perfectly with the migrations of the Caucasians.

not to mention youre dismissing the depictions of the Israelites, which were pale and light featured individuals

Lamenation 4:7-The Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of samphire.
Click to expand...
As will be seen now, John Tzetzes' work also confirms that fact that the Scythians are of Turkic origin

Also there is no proof of the med to Briton migration that's been posted post the genomic revolution.

Also the distinction is wide enough not just genetically but also the artefacts show that it was mainly Norwegians that went to Scotland and Ireland not Danes.

And if it's referring to the pan Celtic area it's way to far north.
 
snufkin said:
As will be seen now, John Tzetzes' work also confirms that fact that the Scythians are of Turkic origin
Click to expand...
John Tzetzes was a medieval n***a using outdated shit. modern scholarship shows the Scythians were Indo-Iranian not Turkic.
snufkin said:
Also there is no proof of the med to Briton migration that's been posted post the genomic revolution.
Click to expand...
wrong https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25738
snufkin said:
Also the distinction is wide enough not just genetically but also the artefacts show that it was mainly Norwegians that went to Scotland and Ireland not Danes.
Click to expand...
Norwegians were in Scotland and Ireland, historical records confirm danes being there
snufkin said:
And if it's referring to the pan Celtic area it's way to far north.
Click to expand...
“Celtica” is the Celtic cultural sphere from central Europe to the British Isle


also you keep dismissing the descriptions of the Israelites,
 
notsocommonthumb said:
John Tzetzes was a medieval n***a using outdated shit. modern scholarship shows the Scythians were Indo-Iranian not Turkic.

wrong https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25738

Norwegians were in Scotland and Ireland, historical records confirm danes being there

“Celtica” is the Celtic cultural sphere from central Europe to the British Isle


also you keep dismissing the descriptions of the Israelites,
Click to expand...
Bell beakers come from corded ware lol
 
snufkin said:
Bell beakers come from corded ware lol
Click to expand...
Bell Beakers had Mediterranean ancestry, not just Corded Ware. also stop ignoring the physical descriptions, its not fair how I have to respond to every one of your points whereas you only respond to 50% of mine
 
“yeah bro let me log in into looksmaxxing.com are argue about who are the true Israelites…. Hhehehehhee it’s we!! The Europeans!!!!”
 
N30N said:
N30N said:
I'm 50% Polish, 25% Scottish, and 25% Trinidadian.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
you def have Israelite in you, so aslong as you believe in Jesus and dont blaspheme against the Holy Spirit, dont take the mark of the beast and dont worship the beast then I believe u can go to heaven. tho im not sure what the consensus on racemixing is.
 
notsocommonthumb said:
Bell Beakers had Mediterranean ancestry, not just Corded Ware. also stop ignoring the physical descriptions, its not fair how I have to respond to every one of your points whereas you only respond to 50% of mine
Click to expand...
Beacuse I don't care what the bible has to say and it's not a good source for this. And with bell beakers they were not going to Denmark that was corded ware and corded ware were yamnaya descendants and this is all prehistoric discussion which you said was not what the bible was talking about lol.
 
I've been believing in Jesus, and haven't blasphemed the holy spirit (denying God)
I know racemixing is not natural and sucks but I had no choice in being born this way. I'm a proud white regardless. At the end of the day I don't believe only Israelites can get to heaven. Anyone who accepts Christ is good.
 
N30N said:
I've been believing in Jesus, and haven't blasphemed the holy spirit (denying God)
I know racemixing is not natural and sucks but I had no choice in being born this way. I'm a proud white regardless. At the end of the day I don't believe only Israelites can get to heaven. Anyone who accepts Christ is good.
Click to expand...
But you're all equal under christ so racemixing doesn't matter
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top