Join 33,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Tom Brady and Brad Pitt prove that aging with bones is superior..

Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
251
Reputation
277
Location
Buddyboyo's house
Screenshot_20210212-093909~2.png
c9af034ea0a398b917fdb48bf0b6107a.jpg


Both of them do not even look like they aged. "Muh collagen, hair and, stuff", is indeed important. But this is the exact reason why Chad's at the top tend to age so well. If you have great facial bones, you'll be good looking your whole life. Facial bones are the difference between a pretty boy and a chad. A pretty boy is just a guy with a harmonious look, amazing skin and eyes+ hair. However he lacks the hypermasculine facial bones of real chad. And that's why they age badly in most cases.
 
this is why chico ended up looking like shit within a few years
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3
this is why chico ended up looking like shit within a few years


Pretty much. He lacks the natural robust facial bones and masculinity of legit slayer. His frame is also quite small with curved clavicles and his muscle insertions aren't good enough to make him look bigger than he is.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top