Traditionalism is anti eugenic

[Ilya.]

Arranged marriages? Pakistan and India
Sexual conservativism ? Middle East
Anti abortion ? Allow mixed race and low iq and ugly kids

Look at the least traditional places historically (north europe) and these are the most eugenic people (Scandinavians,balts, Brits, north slavs)

@Volksstaffel
@over0
@Mogden

 

[Newday]

Mixed mogs fuck you

 

[Ilya.]

Mixed mogs fuck you

Cope it's bad

 

[limo8]

Can you say it more easy im bad at thinking

 

[Ilya.]

Can you say it more easy im bad at thinking

Not having sexy society= bad beacuse people become ugly and dumb and such

 

[Volksstaffel]

Arranged marriages? Pakistan and India
Sexual conservativism ? Middle East
Anti abortion ? Allow mixed race and low iq and ugly kids

True

Look at the least traditional places historically (north europe) and these are the most eugenic people (Scandinavians,balts, Brits, north slavs)

Idk about that one

 

[limo8]

Not having sexy society= bad beacuse people become ugly and dumb and such

Well hmmm i mean idk tbh i would prefer for people to be good looking and smart cus if stupid people born there fewer progress overall

 

[Decay]

Not having sexy society= bad beacuse people become ugly and dumb and such

So just to confirm, you are a eugenicist, right?

 

[Ilya.]

True

Idk about that one

Why

 

[Ilya.]

So just to confirm, you are a eugenicist, right?

Somewhat

 

[Decay]

Somewhat

Racially or in terms of overall genetic quality IE; attractiveness?

 

[Ilya.]

Racially or in terms of overall genetic quality IE; attractiveness?

Both

 

[Ilya.]

Racially or in terms of overall genetic quality IE; attractiveness?

I don't really care what people do outside of my community/tribe

 

[Decay]

Both

I would agree with racial eugenics. But the issue with the latter is this: if the average man and woman became attractive, then what is considered objectively attractive would no longer hold the same value. That’s how society works. The fundamental flaw within eugenics is quite simple, i don’t understand how people can agree with such an easily dismantled fallacy.

 

[Ilya.]

I would agree with racial eugenics. But the issue with the latter is this: if the average man and woman became attractive, then what is considered objectively attractive would no longer hold the same value. That’s how society works. The fundamental flaw within eugenics is quite simple, i don’t understand how people can agree with such an easily dismantled fallacy.

It's not just about attraction

 

[Mogden]

Mixed mogs fuck you

Genetically you’re prone to more crippling conditions and diseases if you mix outside your race.

 

[Newday]

Genetically you’re prone to more crippling conditions and diseases if you mix outside your race.

Is this due to actual mixing ‘races’, or is it due to the parent’s specific genetics, is it a correlation or a causation. Do you even have a source? people have to ask themselves this. If it is purely outcome data.

In a pure biological and physiological sense, mixed ancestry is better for heterozygosity, mixed race people also have a lesser chance of receiving recessive mutations due to their varied genetics copies they get from their parents.

This is not exclusively seen in mixed ‘race’ people though, more of a wider mixed ancestry.

 

[Mogden]

Is this due to actual mixing ‘races’, or is it due to the parent’s specific genetics, is it a correlation or a causation. Do you even have a source? people have to ask themselves this. If it is purely outcome data.

In a pure biological and physiological sense, mixed ancestry is better for heterozygosity, mixed race people also have a lesser chance of receiving recessive mutations due to their varied genetics copies they get from their parents.

This is not exclusively seen in mixed ‘race’ people though, more of a wider mixed ancestry.

By mixing, you expose the genome to different diseases existing in the entire family line of each parent. If each parent is a different geographical race then their bloodline will carry different diseases and the genetic factors the other bloodline has won’t be able to handle the foreign genetic anomaly. It’s both

 

[Newday]

By mixing, you expose the genome to different diseases existing in the entire family line of each parent. If each parent is a different geographical race then their bloodline will carry different diseases and the genetic factors the other bloodline has won’t be able to handle the foreign genetic anomaly. It’s both

This makes absolutely 0 scientifically.
You are more prone to genetic diseases if both ends of your family are carrying the same mutated gene, not the other way round, this becomes more likely when your gene-pool is limited.

People with mixed people have a wider genetic diversity, for example if your mother has a recessive gene mutation (which could be common from where she is from), your father could cancel it with his non mutated gene. This isn’t exclusive to mixed ‘race’ people of course.
The increased risk comes from SHARED mutations not exposure to varied genetics.

The last part “won’t be able to handle the foreign genetic anomaly” doesn’t make a lot of sense. Humans are one species all-together, there is no genetic anomaly, almost every human is genetically compatible with another.

 

[Jawggernaut Mewlord]

Get rid of any remnant of the past, fuck & erase history. Everything has to be modern and sleek.

Past is just creepy

 

[Newday]

Get rid of any remnant of the past, fuck & erase history. Everything has to be modern and sleek.

Past is just creepy

I do not like the mixture neither. Pick one or the other, do not keep a mixture of both