Join 45,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Discussion Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces

Randomized Shame

Softmaxxer
Administrator
Staff
MotM Award
Contributor
Reputable
Established ★
Joined
Jan 19, 2024
Messages
3,639
Solutions
7
Time Online
8d 6h
Reputation
16,195
Location
United States
I found this article in a Discord server and I thought it was interesting.

"Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces: Analysis of 100 Facial Points in 42 Caucasian Celebrities" is the name of the article and it was released in 2023, so I'm getting to it kind of late but lmao. I just found it now.

It's a simple read. I thought I'd see what others think about it though.

Only caucasian celebrities aged 23 to 42 were included in this study.

The female celebrities and models included in their study were: Angelina Jolie, Alecia Beth Moore, Ashley Graham, Bella Hadid, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Christina Applegate, Cindy Crawford, Courtney Cox, Gigi Hadid, Gisele Bundchen, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jennifer Garner, Jodie Foster, Julia Roberts, Karlie Kloss, Kate Hudson, Kendall Jenner, Michelle Pfeiffer, Nicole Kidman, Rosie Huntington, and Sandra Bullock.

The male celebrities and models included in their study were: Adam Levine, Blake Shelton, Bradley Cooper, Channing Tatum, Chris Hemsworth, David Beckham, Leonardo DiCaprio, Mel Gibson, Arthur Kulkov, David Gandy, John Kortajarena, Sean O’Pry, Tobias Sorensen, Noah Mills, Ollie Edwards, Paul Rudd, Ryan Burns, Ryan Reynolds, Simon Nessman, Tom Cruise, and Tyson Ballou.

Their method for determining the ratios was actually interesting.

First, they said they used Apple's Vision Framework for the AI that determined the basic dots (or landmarks as they called it) on the face. They still had to manually input some landmarks themselves, though, so 🤔

This image presents two side-by-side portraits of what appear to be celebrities, Angelina Jolie on the left and David Gandy on the right, with various facial landmarks overlaid and highlighted by colored dots and lines, likely for an analysis of facial symmetry or proportions.  Left Panel (Angelina Jolie): Her face is depicted with numerous small white dots outlining the perimeter of her face, jawline, and nose. Green dots highlight her eyes, yellow dots outline her nose, and purple dots outline her lips. Blue dots mark the pupils. A legend on the bottom left clarifies the color coding:  Green: Eye Cyan: Corneal White-to-white Red: Pupil Center Blue: Eyebrows Yellow: Nose Purple: Lips White: Peripheral Facial Contour Green (lighter shade): Median Line Right Panel (David Gandy): His face also has similar overlaid dots and lines. Green dots highlight his eyes, yellow dots outline his nose, and purple dots outline his lips. Blue dots mark the pupils. The same color-coded legend as the left panel is present on the bottom left.  Below the portraits, there is a detailed caption explaining the image: Figure 1. Sample subset of facial landmarks for (A) Angelina Jolie and (B) David Gandy. Bright green = eyelid colors; cyan = eyebrows; dark green = median line and glabella; yellow = nose; white = facial contour including trichion and bilateral hairline points; dark blue = inner/outer lips. Eighty-two key landmarks were shown on each celebrity; the remaining 18 landmarks (detailed hairline, temporal bone, etc.) were not included for visibility purposes. Images obtained from Shutterstock.com.

Second, they determined each subject's white-to-white corneal diameter (the width of the colored part of the eye) in pixels, then they used that to determine the rest of the face. That's obviously an over simplification but I doubt anyone here actually gives a shit what the method was in detail.

This image is a four-panel figure (A, B, C, D) showing close-up views of a human eye, likely demonstrating a process of image analysis or measurement related to the eye. Each panel shows the same eye with slightly different overlaid graphics.  Panel A: Shows the eye with numerous small green dots outlining the eyelid and possibly the eyebrow and surrounding facial contours. The iris and pupil are clearly visible. Panel B: Similar to A, but with an additional red circular outline encompassing the iris and pupil, and another irregular red outline within it, perhaps tracing the pupil. The green dots are still present. Panel C: Similar to B, but the irregular red outline around the pupil has slightly changed shape, suggesting an iterative process. The green dots are still present. Panel D: Similar to C, with the red irregular outline around the pupil having further adjusted, likely representing the final or optimized detection of the pupil/iris boundary. The green dots are still present. Below the four panels, there is a caption: Figure 2. Each subject's corneal white-to-white was segmented using an automatic, active contour technique in MATLAB (Mathworks: Natick, MA). (A) Initial corneal white-to-white points were utilized as pilot points to (B, C) iteratively detect white-to-white boundaries. (D) The final outcome was then fitted to a circle to obtain final white-to-white corneal diameter for each subject. Images reproduced with permission from Shutterstock.com.

It's more interesting than I'm making it out to be, but it might be something we could learn from. I don't know how people currently determine their ratios. The findings in general was just also interesting.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
AI will revolutionise everything on God.
 
I found this article in a Discord server and I thought it was interesting.

"Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces: Analysis of 100 Facial Points in 42 Caucasian Celebrities" is the name of the article and it was released in 2023, so I'm getting to it kind of late but lmao. I just found it now.

It's a simple read. I thought I'd see what others think about it though.

Only caucasian celebrities aged 23 to 42 were included in this study.

The female celebrities and models included in their study were: Angelina Jolie, Alecia Beth Moore, Ashley Graham, Bella Hadid, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Christina Applegate, Cindy Crawford, Courtney Cox, Gigi Hadid, Gisele Bundchen, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jennifer Garner, Jodie Foster, Julia Roberts, Karlie Kloss, Kate Hudson, Kendall Jenner, Michelle Pfeiffer, Nicole Kidman, Rosie Huntington, and Sandra Bullock.

The male celebrities and models included in their study were: Adam Levine, Blake Shelton, Bradley Cooper, Channing Tatum, Chris Hemsworth, David Beckham, Leonardo DiCaprio, Mel Gibson, Arthur Kulkov, David Gandy, John Kortajarena, Sean O’Pry, Tobias Sorensen, Noah Mills, Ollie Edwards, Paul Rudd, Ryan Burns, Ryan Reynolds, Simon Nessman, Tom Cruise, and Tyson Ballou.

Their method for determining the ratios was actually interesting.

First, they said they used Apple's Vision Framework for the AI that determined the basic dots (or landmarks as they called it) on the face. They still had to manually input some landmarks themselves, though, so 🤔

View attachment 97534

Second, they determined each subject's white-to-white corneal diameter (the width of the colored part of the eye) in pixels, then they used that to determine the rest of the face. That's obviously an over simplification but I doubt anyone here actually gives a shit what the method was in detail.

View attachment 97536

It's more interesting than I'm making it out to be, but it might be something we could learn from. I don't know how people currently determine their ratios. The findings in general was just also interesting.
Imagine the fit the unabomber would be in rn
 
I found this article in a Discord server and I thought it was interesting.

"Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces: Analysis of 100 Facial Points in 42 Caucasian Celebrities" is the name of the article and it was released in 2023, so I'm getting to it kind of late but lmao. I just found it now.

It's a simple read. I thought I'd see what others think about it though.

Only caucasian celebrities aged 23 to 42 were included in this study.

The female celebrities and models included in their study were: Angelina Jolie, Alecia Beth Moore, Ashley Graham, Bella Hadid, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Christina Applegate, Cindy Crawford, Courtney Cox, Gigi Hadid, Gisele Bundchen, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jennifer Garner, Jodie Foster, Julia Roberts, Karlie Kloss, Kate Hudson, Kendall Jenner, Michelle Pfeiffer, Nicole Kidman, Rosie Huntington, and Sandra Bullock.

The male celebrities and models included in their study were: Adam Levine, Blake Shelton, Bradley Cooper, Channing Tatum, Chris Hemsworth, David Beckham, Leonardo DiCaprio, Mel Gibson, Arthur Kulkov, David Gandy, John Kortajarena, Sean O’Pry, Tobias Sorensen, Noah Mills, Ollie Edwards, Paul Rudd, Ryan Burns, Ryan Reynolds, Simon Nessman, Tom Cruise, and Tyson Ballou.

Their method for determining the ratios was actually interesting.

First, they said they used Apple's Vision Framework for the AI that determined the basic dots (or landmarks as they called it) on the face. They still had to manually input some landmarks themselves, though, so 🤔

View attachment 97534

Second, they determined each subject's white-to-white corneal diameter (the width of the colored part of the eye) in pixels, then they used that to determine the rest of the face. That's obviously an over simplification but I doubt anyone here actually gives a shit what the method was in detail.

View attachment 97536

It's more interesting than I'm making it out to be, but it might be something we could learn from. I don't know how people currently determine their ratios. The findings in general was just also interesting.
determining dimorphism and ratios are easy tbh
 
I found this article in a Discord server and I thought it was interesting.

"Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces: Analysis of 100 Facial Points in 42 Caucasian Celebrities" is the name of the article and it was released in 2023, so I'm getting to it kind of late but lmao. I just found it now.

It's a simple read. I thought I'd see what others think about it though.

Only caucasian celebrities aged 23 to 42 were included in this study.

The female celebrities and models included in their study were: Angelina Jolie, Alecia Beth Moore, Ashley Graham, Bella Hadid, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Christina Applegate, Cindy Crawford, Courtney Cox, Gigi Hadid, Gisele Bundchen, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jennifer Garner, Jodie Foster, Julia Roberts, Karlie Kloss, Kate Hudson, Kendall Jenner, Michelle Pfeiffer, Nicole Kidman, Rosie Huntington, and Sandra Bullock.

The male celebrities and models included in their study were: Adam Levine, Blake Shelton, Bradley Cooper, Channing Tatum, Chris Hemsworth, David Beckham, Leonardo DiCaprio, Mel Gibson, Arthur Kulkov, David Gandy, John Kortajarena, Sean O’Pry, Tobias Sorensen, Noah Mills, Ollie Edwards, Paul Rudd, Ryan Burns, Ryan Reynolds, Simon Nessman, Tom Cruise, and Tyson Ballou.

Their method for determining the ratios was actually interesting.

First, they said they used Apple's Vision Framework for the AI that determined the basic dots (or landmarks as they called it) on the face. They still had to manually input some landmarks themselves, though, so 🤔

View attachment 97534

Second, they determined each subject's white-to-white corneal diameter (the width of the colored part of the eye) in pixels, then they used that to determine the rest of the face. That's obviously an over simplification but I doubt anyone here actually gives a shit what the method was in detail.

View attachment 97536

It's more interesting than I'm making it out to be, but it might be something we could learn from. I don't know how people currently determine their ratios. The findings in general was just also interesting.


Yeah they used the iris method they measured the real life distance between the iris in a few patients and then worked back wards to look at male models or celebrities and they minused the pixel length from the eye length to get a difference and used these landmarks to get a reading of the whole face it's actually really good
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top