Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

What is the government's top objective in your eyes?

ok bye guys i’m gonna stop these cortisol increase activities and watch slime asmr ok bye
IMG_0127.png
 
Wagering the importance of borders by exemplifying technological advancement can be turned against you as well.
It can be said that war is great because of the countless scientific and technological advancements.

Competition is an important part of human nature; I think that borders help to solidify the law of competition.
Competition is rivalry,you see 2 male animals fighting over a mate in nature but you don’t see an army of 100.000 bears invading another 100.000 bears. War is fucked and is not part of human nature,it’s a simple imitation of hunting. Competition is not on a large scale.
 
trucel with an iphone??? was the balance destroyed?
 
Thoughts on this in 2 minutes.
 
War is fucked and is not part of human nature, it’s a simple imitation of hunting.
True true, but the fact that rivilary still remains in low-scale civilisations shows that it's inevitable.
Humans are instilled with an inherent need for power and superiority.
Hence why borders are natural. Capitalism, fundamentally, is just rivilary.
 
True true, but the fact that rivilary still remains in low-scale civilisations shows that it's inevitable.
Humans are instilled with an inherent need for power and superiority.
Hence why borders are natural. Capitalism, fundamentally, is just rivilary.
Borders on a small scale like I said,I don’t feel like just because you’re born in a circle that’s thousands of miles in diameter you’re obligated to be. And the “rivalry” you see with all these systems are simply not natural,just a human mistake.
 

Lowkey remind of that one Priest's poem from WW2:

Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

I wish I was just forced into doing that Big Brother enforced me to do.
 
This is the fundamental law for governments to follow. Serve and protect.
But does that they should be able to strip other countries of their natural resources?
To be able to invade potential militaristic threats?
Because that will all potentially benefit their community, but in the grand scheme fuck over other countries.
Generally speaking, trade (or nowadays currency) is one of our most valuable assets as a society. It's possible to collect resources in exchange of trade or labor of some kind. It's why China is as powerful as they are on a production level, despite them being deemed as a developing country.

In theory we could achieve many or most of our goals and objectives without invasion or pillaging.

It's normally against the best interest of the country or community to do war. Normally it causes hardship like famine and death. The outcomes that are "beneficial" almost always could've been achieved in any other way.
 

“Too much freedom” dosen’t exist,everything you do is controlled and tracked. Your “vote” in an election will not matter,it is already pre determined. That’s so surface level.
 
Societies were never mean to exceed to so many people countries hold today, what humans live in today is merely a mistake.
 
Ye reminder 👀 Everything that is bound to Wi-Fi is being tracked,the “Eu message control” shit that is soon about to vote is nothing special,they’re already doing what they present.
 
“Too much freedom” dosen’t exist,everything you do is controlled and tracked. Your “vote” in an election will not matter,it is already pre determined. That’s so surface level.
i just want the government to put a chip in my head and threaten to blow my brains out every time i go 42 in a 40
 
Ye reminder 👀 Everything that is bound to Wi-Fi is being tracked,the “Eu message control” shit that is soon about to vote is nothing special,they’re already doing what they present.
I never connected it to wifi but to 220v :D
 
unknown exploit saar


its all in ur head saar

1757795812111.png
 
Ye reminder 👀 Everything that is bound to Wi-Fi is being tracked,the “Eu message control” shit that is soon about to vote is nothing special,they’re already doing what they present.
Any Intel-based cpu made past 2007 is tracking you too. The management engine is a level 0 cpu function. It can operate even when your computer is switched off, Intel (or other malicious actors) can quite literally see what's on your computer when it's switched off and not connected to the internet. You can't remove it either, it's essential to the CPU.
 
Generally speaking, trade (or nowadays currency) is one of our most valuable assets as a society. It's possible to collect resources in exchange of trade or labor of some kind. It's why China is as powerful as they are on a production level, despite them being deemed as a developing country.

In theory we could achieve many or most of our goals and objectives without invasion or pillaging.

It's normally against the best interest of the country or community to do war. Normally it causes hardship like famine and death. The outcomes that are "beneficial" almost always could've been achieved in any other way.
True. Trade and labour are humanity's oldest currencies. However, trade barriers really fuck relations up.
What happens when another country jacks up the price of their exports, or place quotas on how much of a good they'll export?

Take America and China as an example. America is trying to become self-sufficient, so they place heavy tarrifs and quotas on China (to make Chinese-imported more expensive and therefore make America-based products more desireable).

How do you think that'll affect their relationship? America is ruining any chance of interdependence between itself and China. Going by this, isn't it better for a government to have minimal imports, to approach becoming autarkic?

Sometimes the best option for a government is to invade, mainly for raw materials. I bet that if China debilitated overnight (domestic affairs and international relations), American fighter jets would be streaming over within the hour.
 
Interesting, control > freedom?
yeah if you look at everything from the right angle its there to demean/demoralize and prevent true freedom

people say its about money but money is just another method of keeping control
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top