Discussion What percent is HTN?

[IMPORTANT:]

Then what do you measure with the

this is how ik u havent read a word ive said n***a

 

[Joturttle]

this is how ik u havent read a word ive said n***a

DNR

 

[over0]

No n***a like ive said multiple times WE DO NOT MEASURE ACCORDING TO AN IDEAL

Go back and read my messages then try again

But we do tho

 

[IMPORTANT:]

But we do tho

no we dont

 

[over0]

no we dont

Yk the whole chad in Mumbai thing is a joke right? We don't know people locations when we rate them so we just rate them on a general scale, wouldn't make a difference if we did.

 

[IMPORTANT:]

Yk the whole chad in Mumbai thing is a joke right? We don't know people locations when we rate them so we just rate them on a general scale, wouldn't make a difference if we did.

u do rate according to location n***a
htn is different in sweden than in zimbabwe

 

[RottingCarrie]

read what i said n****r u dont know wtf im saying ur js typing shit

U actually cant fucking debate this bro its js basic logic

Yes I understand what you meant, no one here is saying the definition of average has changed

 

[Hyaluronic]

This is a more so philosophical question.

If we go biologically, htns are rare and hltn is like the average. However, it still does not make sense because legit mltns or lower are usually invisible to women unless unbelievably ntmaxxed. This means that being slightly below average puts you into an undatable category. Again, doesn’t make sense because I always see slightly below average guys with girls.

If we go statistically (which I think should be the right way to measure), mmtn should be the absolute average. However, mmtn (from my understanding) is 5.5 while the average should be 5 (statistically). But then again, statistics don’t mean anything because the countries with highest populations are usually the poorest (think Inida, China and such) and a lot of the times have shit genes, which would put legit average at like mltn.

Measuring average as statistically average for the west makes the most sense, however, with the amount of poor migrants coming EU recently the average is rapidly declining.

Then you have to count basic softmaxxing - a guy that has a top tier base but legit unnaproachable features (NW 6 with long, thin oily hair; absolutely acnecell; guy with a weird looking beard) will be rated much higher than the guy with terrible base and same features. However, unless he softmaxxes he will be as invisible to women as the guy with a deathtier base. This is important to count because 95% of benefit comes from the most basic 20% of softmaxxing which all normies do, although I still often see people who are too lazy for that.

Imo I think that lmtn is average right in the west and some adjacent countries but it doesn’t matter because even if somebody has a perfect scale there are too many factors to consider which mean that everybody will still be using their own thus scewing the whole thing.

 

[Hyaluronic]

Yk the whole chad in Mumbai thing is a joke right? We don't know people locations when we rate them so we just rate them on a general scale, wouldn't make a difference if we did.

Rating on a world scale doesn’t make sense because most people who speak English or even understand blackpill + have enough braincells to find these forums usually live in the west + adjacent countries

 

[Ghoultune]

Um…I have to meet everyone in the world personally in order to dictate that