Join 48,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

What the fuck is the difference between a htb and a stacylite

obsession with categorizing, enumerating and classifying everything is a massive, massive incel trait.

a bunch of spergs arguing over whether someone is a MLHMMLHHHMTN or a MLHHMMMTN while they can't even agree on whether Gosling is gl or subhuman, all while claiming looks are entirely objective, lmao.

they also, despite their infinite understanding of looks, can't tell whether a new user who posts pics for rating is a truecel or a womanizer irl until ... the said user describes his experience himself. of course, that's when they suddenly realize that the guy in question has "a typical incel pheno" (if he says he's only seen pussy in the mirror) or start rambling about "harmony" and "NTpill" (if he manages to sell himself as someone with sexual experience at least somewhat plausibly)

this exact fixation running rampant here is how i know PSL is essentially still a legit incel loser subculture
 
Last edited:
obsession with categorizing, enumerating and classifying everything is a massive, massive incel trait.

a bunch of spergs arguing over whether someone is a MLHMMLHHHMTN or a MLHHMMMTN while they can't even agree on whether Gosling is gl or subhuman, all while claiming looks are entirely objective, lmao.

they also, despite their infinite understanding of looks, can't tell whether a new user who posts pics for rating is a truecel or a womanizer irl until ... the said user describes his experience himself. of course, that's when they suddenly realize that the guy in question has "a typical incel pheno" (if he says he's only seen pussy in the mirror) or start rambling about "harmony" and "NTpill" (if he manages to sell himself as someone with sexual experience at least somewhat plausibly)

this exact fixation running rampant here is how i know PSL is essentially still a legit incel loser subculture

neat post content to user title ratio
 
Not very important


The male-female interactions in this forum, especially in relation to the general context of collective interaction, are what you need to understand how the attraction dynamic is much more complex

I don’t “ask” you to look at the interactions in real time and put them into some sort of comprehensive framework because it’s probably an unnatural effort but I’m sure that real everyday life is more than enough to demonstrate the practical uselessness of ratings above a certain range
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top