Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Serious What vibe do I give off (For the huzz of .com especially)

Newday

Gei Werewolf
Contributor
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Feb 20, 2025
Messages
16,613
Solutions
1
Time Online
1mo 5d
Reputation
42,621
Location
The Wonderland
Come on huzz Ik you all want a piece of this bro I can smell it through the screen, what vibe do I give off?

1746052448249.png
 
Register to hide this ad
Strong opinions with no credibility
says you when you claimed that cooking spawns in more nutrients than before then said it gives more bioavailability when nutrients are heat-sensitive compounds you fool that makes no sense at all, it's the source of the nutrients that effects bioavailability not the cooking, cooking REDUCES nutrients by destroying them, it doesn't make the that survived nutrients less bioavailable since they are still from the same source
 
says you when you claimed that cooking spawns in more nutrients than before then said it gives more bioavailability when nutrients are heat-sensitive compounds you fool that makes no sense at all, it's the source of the nutrients that effects bioavailability not the cooking, cooking REDUCES nutrients by destroying them, it doesn't make the that survived nutrients less bioavailable since they are still from the same source
Cooking does not universally made food less nutritious idk if you learned this fallacy from tiktok or made it up yourself

Bio availability is when cell walls break down and u can access more, this happens with many different foods while potentially reducing anti nutrients. I showed nuance in what im saying ur just going off opinion it’s really weird to watch
 
Cooking does not universally made food less nutritious idk if you learned this fallacy from tiktok or made it up yourself
1746053933985.png
1746054056189.png

1746054075435.png

1746054185320.png


Bla bla bla bro everyone knows that vitamins and minerals are heat sensitive basic biochemistry how do people not know this in 2025, put any supplement powder and heat it, the powderized nutrients will just fizzle out.
Bio availability is when cell walls break down and u can access more
jfl
this happens with many different foods while potentially reducing anti nutrients.
I wonder why heat destroys anti-nutrients? maybe because it is destructive and breaks down almost any chemical structure that interacts with it (nutrients)? so even if u are reducing anti-nutrients u r still reducing nutrients. also you shouldn't be eating food with a high amount of anti-nutrients anyway, there is no anti-nutrients in meat
 
View attachment 95262View attachment 95264
View attachment 95265
View attachment 95266

Bla bla bla bro everyone knows that vitamins and minerals are heat sensitive basic biochemistry how do people not know this in 2025, put any supplement powder and heat it, the powderized nutrients will just fizzle out.

jfl

I wonder why heat destroys anti-nutrients? maybe because it is destructive and breaks down almost any chemical structure that interacts with it (nutrients)? so even if u are reducing anti-nutrients u r still reducing nutrients. also you shouldn't be eating food with a high amount of anti-nutrients anyway, there is no anti-nutrients in meat
Vitamin B is the only vitamin that exists right.

Jesus Christ are you 15

This is painful to even engage with… seriously
 
View attachment 95262View attachment 95264
View attachment 95265
View attachment 95266

Bla bla bla bro everyone knows that vitamins and minerals are heat sensitive basic biochemistry how do people not know this in 2025, put any supplement powder and heat it, the powderized nutrients will just fizzle out.

jfl

I wonder why heat destroys anti-nutrients? maybe because it is destructive and breaks down almost any chemical structure that interacts with it (nutrients)? so even if u are reducing anti-nutrients u r still reducing nutrients. also you shouldn't be eating food with a high amount of anti-nutrients anyway, there is no anti-nutrients in meat
Talking in large font doesn’t make you right btw
 
Slightly autist very high need
 
Vitamin B is the only vitamin that exists right.

Jesus Christ are you 15

This is painful to even engage with… seriously
Does this guy have eyes? 44% of fat gone, fat soluble vitamins bye bye, whole screenshot of vitamin d, e and a, all lower vitamin trends when cooked, this happens with minerals as well

You are ragebaiting quit the double down
 
Does this guy have eyes? 44% of fat gone, fat soluble vitamins bye bye, whole screenshot of vitamin d, e and a, all lower vitamin trends when cooked, this happens with minerals as well

You are ragebaiting quit the double down
The one track minded people like you never are willing to show their optimal physique so let’s see it and the results of ur tiktok brainwash

Your argument is totally biased, you are focussing on nutrient loss and completely overlooking the increase in absorbed nutrients from cooking. That’s why I argue to eat both raw and cooked diet. Its really not rocket science.

you read one study proving your bias then using it as a central argument when it’s a fraction of the entire topic. You need to chill and just show us ur physique while ur at it instead of putting in bold writing basing ur argument from a single area and study
 
Also not all foods have the same outcomes when u cook it why do I need to talk to you like a r****d
 
The one track minded people like you never are willing to show their optimal physique so let’s see it and the results of ur tiktok brainwash
jfl
Your argument is totally biased, you are focussing on nutrient loss and completely overlooking the increase in absorbed nutrients from cooking.
The only things cooking meat does is denaturing proteins that make it faster to digest, that is it, you cannot increase bioavailability in meat by cooking it, you haven't even tried explaining it biochemically or giving a single study, your argument was "anti-nutrients get destroyed" but there are no anti-nutrients in meat, and if u used that argument in vegetables which u shouldn't be eating anyway then the nutrients get destroyed alongside with the anti nutrients.
you read one study proving your bias then using it as a central argument when it’s a fraction of the entire topic. You need to chill and just show us ur physique while ur at it instead of putting in bold writing basing ur argument from a single area and study
3 different studies and explained biochemically how heat destroys nutrients which is a fundamental thing about heat bro
Funny joke dude let’s see ur physique
Holy insecurity, I can smell the glyphosate in ur blood
 
Each food responds differently to heat

Cooking can either increase or reduce nutrient availability for that exact reason

Some vitamins such as the one study you reference for everything💀 will degrade under heat

Others under heat will have their cell walls break down while reducing anti nutrients therefore increasing bio availability.

It’s like a broken record. This is why you don’t use a single study at university or for literally anything.

We really need an age and physique reveal because keyboard warriors are worth nobodys time
 
jfl

The only things cooking meat does is denaturing proteins that make it faster to digest, that is it, you cannot increase bioavailability in meat by cooking it, you haven't even tried explaining it biochemically or giving a single study, your argument was "anti-nutrients get destroyed" but there are no anti-nutrients in meat, and if u used that argument in vegetables which u shouldn't be eating anyway then the nutrients get destroyed alongside with the anti nutrients.

3 different studies and explained biochemically how heat destroys nutrients which is a fundamental thing about heat bro

Holy insecurity, I can smell the glyphosate in ur blood
Im not insecure I find it super ironic when people have soooo much conviction aboht their views online but in real life show no results. If you are so confident you’d have and show ur results of what u find is optimal but you have strong hard ass opinions, one study to go by along with tiktok culture, and zero proof of results or scientific knowledge
 
Anyone can go behind their screen and give nutriotion opinions and you choose to hide behind yours bc you know you had zero results . Just blind confidence a common incel trait
 
Each food responds differently to heat
Fallacy, every nutrient responds the same don't say "food"
Cooking can either increase or reduce nutrient availability for that exact reason
This is just wrong
Some vitamins such as the one study you reference for everything💀 will degrade under heat
Those were 3 different studies, now explain to me biochemically why heat doesn't degrade nutrients
Others under heat will have their cell walls break down while reducing anti nutrients therefore increasing bio availability.
Jfl
It’s like a broken record. This is why you don’t use a single study at university or for literally anything.
what are u on about
We really need an age and physique reveal because keyboard warriors are worth nobodys time
Im 51 and built like Dolph Lungren
 
Anyone can go behind their screen and give nutriotion opinions and you choose to hide behind yours bc you know you had zero results . Just blind confidence a common incel trait
ramblings
 
@Spuffy pls explain bio availability to this tiktokcel
bioavailability is how easily your body can absorb and use nutrients from food. just because a nutrient exists in a food doesnt mean your body can use it efficiently. cooking can change that. cooking can break down cell walls and fibrous tissues, especially in plant foods. this can:
  1. make nutrients like lycopene (in tomatoes) or beta-carotene (in carrots) more absorbable
  2. reduce antinutrients (like oxalates or phytates) that normally block absorption of minerals like iron or calcium (ive talked about that before)

yes, cooking can destroy some heat sensitive vitamins like vitamin c and some b vitamins. thats why raw fruits and vegetables are still important. saying “cooking always reduces nutrients” is misleading and oversimplified

there's nuance
 
Fallacy, every nutrient responds the same don't say "food"

This is just wrong

Those were 3 different studies, now explain to me biochemically why heat doesn't degrade nutrients

Jfl

what are u on about

Im 51 and built like Dolph Lungren
You’re the dumbest user ever congratulations keyboard warrior. Jfl reacting, typing in bold, cherry picking studies and ignoring basic logic is really sad man, along with having zero results nor personal experience
bioavailability is how easily your body can absorb and use nutrients from food. just because a nutrient exists in a food doesnt mean your body can use it efficiently. cooking can change that. cooking can break down cell walls and fibrous tissues, especially in plant foods. this can:
  1. make nutrients like lycopene (in tomatoes) or beta-carotene (in carrots) more absorbable
  2. reduce antinutrients (like oxalates or phytates) that normally block absorption of minerals like iron or calcium (ive talked about that before)

yes, cooking can destroy some heat sensitive vitamins like vitamin c and some b vitamins. thats why raw fruits and vegetables are still important. saying “cooking always reduces nutrients” is misleading and oversimplified

there's nuance
Ive shown nuance arguing to eat both raw and cooked but this guy is just really something
 
bioavailability is how easily your body can absorb and use nutrients from food. just because a nutrient exists in a food doesnt mean your body can use it efficiently. cooking can change that. cooking can break down cell walls and fibrous tissues, especially in plant foods. this can:
This doesn't apply to meat, shouldn't be eating plant foods but that is offtopic here, this still doesn't improve nutrient absorption, as most of "plant" nutrients such as Vitamin C, folate and B1 all get nuked, the only benefit are lycopene and carotenoids which are 2 quite useless "nutrients", Vegetables are usually boiled aswell, so say bye bye to the water-soluble minerals found in them.
  1. make nutrients like lycopene (in tomatoes) or beta-carotene (in carrots) more absorbable
Beta-carotene is useless our bodies can barely convert it to vitamin A, most people eat it thinking they are getting vitamin A while suffering from a deficiency, the actual active form is found in animal fat. Lycopene is also an unnecessary anti-oxidant, there is not really much to sacrifice for it
  1. reduce antinutrients (like oxalates or phytates) that normally block absorption of minerals like iron or calcium (ive talked about that before)
It reduces anti-nutrients because HEAT destroys nutrients AND anti-nutrients indiscriminately, there is no benefit.
yes, cooking can destroy some heat sensitive vitamins like vitamin c and some b vitamins. thats why raw fruits and vegetables are still important.
Vegetables are not part of the natural human diet
saying “cooking always reduces nutrients” is misleading and oversimplified
It does, just linked studies, biochemically all vitamins are heat sensitive, even the most resistant ones such as Vitamin A in meat still lose a large portion.
 
Wouldnt you be the rambler because u type ur bias on here showing no results?
You just want to have an ego standoff with physiques, I was insanely strong when I was natty but this doesn't matter at all, judging from you asking for age I suspect you are quite old as well, you talk like an old person
 
You just want to have an ego standoff with physiques, I was insanely strong when I was natty but this doesn't matter at all, judging from you asking for age I suspect you are quite old as well, you talk like an old person
I’m 21 it says on my profile. If hat were the case I wouldn’t have argued with u for two days in a row about ur shitty takes. U have zero results and like I said there’s no surprise for that
 
This doesn't apply to meat, shouldn't be eating plant foods but that is offtopic here, this still doesn't improve nutrient absorption, as most of "plant" nutrients such as Vitamin C, folate and B1 all get nuked, the only benefit are lycopene and carotenoids which are 2 quite useless "nutrients", Vegetables are usually boiled aswell, so say bye bye to the water-soluble minerals found in them.

Beta-carotene is useless our bodies can barely convert it to vitamin A, most people eat it thinking they are getting vitamin A while suffering from a deficiency, the actual active form is found in animal fat. Lycopene is also an unnecessary anti-oxidant, there is not really much to sacrifice for it

It reduces anti-nutrients because HEAT destroys nutrients AND anti-nutrients indiscriminately, there is no benefit.

Vegetables are not part of the natural human diet

It does, just linked studies, biochemically all vitamins are heat sensitive, even the most resistant ones such as Vitamin A in meat still lose a large portion.
so youre right about a few things. many vitamins are heat sensitive, especially vitamin c, folate (B9), and thiamine (B1). yes, some degradation happens with heat, even vitamin a (in retinol form). boiling can cause water soluble nutrients to leach out into the cooking water if its discarded. beta-carotene is less efficiently converted to vitamin A than retinol from animal sources (true, but not “useless”)

heres what i would disagree on:
  1. "Cooking always reduces nutrients" = misleading
    • yes, some are reduced, but others become more bioavailable
      • lycopene absorption increases significantly when tomatoes are cooked
      • cooking breaks down fiber and cell walls in plants, freeing up minerals
      • boiling might cause losses, but steaming, roasting, or sauteing can preserve more
  2. "Lycopene and carotenoids are useless" = false
    • lycopene has antioxidant properties and has been studied for links to reduced cancer and heart disease risks
    • carotenoids (like beta-carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin) are important for eye health, among other things
  3. "Vegetables are not part of the natural human diet" = pseudoscience
    • this claim is rooted in carnivore or paleo ideology, not mainstream science
    • humans have evolved eating a mixed diet such as tubers, fruits, nuts, and vegetables for millennia
  4. "Reducing anti-nutrients has no benefit because heat destroys everything" = incorrect framing
    • reducing anti-nutrients like oxalates or phytates is a benefit. even if other nutrients are lost in the process, it can increase net mineral absorption (like iron and calcium)!!
im not in this argument between you and neymar, i just find these opinions interesting. im going to back out now and agree to disagree.
 
so youre right about a few things. many vitamins are heat sensitive, especially vitamin c, folate (B9), and thiamine (B1). yes, some degradation happens with heat, even vitamin a (in retinol form). boiling can cause water soluble nutrients to leach out into the cooking water if its discarded. beta-carotene is less efficiently converted to vitamin A than retinol from animal sources (true, but not “useless”)

heres what i would disagree on:
  1. "Cooking always reduces nutrients" = misleading
    • yes, some are reduced, but others become more bioavailable
      • lycopene absorption increases significantly when tomatoes are cooked
      • cooking breaks down fiber and cell walls in plants, freeing up minerals
      • boiling might cause losses, but steaming, roasting, or sauteing can preserve more
    • lycopene has antioxidant properties and has been studied for links to reduced cancer and heart disease risks
    • carotenoids (like beta-carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin) are important for eye health, among other things
im not in this argument between you and neymar, i just find these opinions interesting. im going to back out now and agree to disagree.
Human beings eat anything and everything, even if its so poisonous that you need to go to school just to learn how to make it safe for consumption
 
I’m 21 it says on my profile. If hat were the case I wouldn’t have argued with u for two days in a row about ur shitty takes. U have zero results and like I said there’s no surprise for that
Why do you keep going in circles about results? You had nothing good to say which I was hoping for then it boiled down to you demanding to have an ego-off with physiques when the talk is about nutrition, you clearly place too much pride on muscles as it is the thing you resort to when challenged, this isn't a good trait this is commonly seen in red pilled men, to be respectful I won't place my prejudice, but still you are growing vindictive.
 
so youre right about a few things. many vitamins are heat sensitive, especially vitamin c, folate (B9), and thiamine (B1). yes, some degradation happens with heat, even vitamin a (in retinol form). boiling can cause water soluble nutrients to leach out into the cooking water if its discarded. beta-carotene is less efficiently converted to vitamin A than retinol from animal sources (true, but not “useless”)

heres what i would disagree on:
  1. "Cooking always reduces nutrients" = misleading
    • yes, some are reduced, but others become more bioavailable
      • lycopene absorption increases significantly when tomatoes are cooked

    • cooking breaks down fiber and cell walls in plants, freeing up minerals
    • boiling might cause losses, but steaming, roasting, or sauteing can preserve more
    • lycopene has antioxidant properties and has been studied for links to reduced cancer and heart disease risks
    • carotenoids (like beta-carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin) are important for eye health, among other things
im not in this argument between you and neymar, i just find these opinions interesting. im going to back out now and agree to disagree.
Lycopene isn't a traditional nutrient like vitamins and minerals are, if you become deficient in traditional nutrients you will feel like shit, if you become deficient in lycopene which isnt a thing because it isnt a traditional nutrient then nothing happens, it's just another bioactive carotenoid like beta-carotene, we shouldn't appeal to cooking because it makes carotenoids (plant colouring btw) more bioavailable when all the traditional nutrients get put in the dump, and even so we shouldnt be eating plants. I like tomatoes though they are alright

The small amount of minerals that you get from plant foods just get destroyed all leached out anyway

True steaming and stuff can greatly preserve more, but again it's plant foods, not much you are preserving.

Most of the benefits from lycopene and other plant related stuff like fibre are purely from epidemiology studies and not actual science


Epidemiology studies are basically correlation studies with people, for example if I was trying to see if eating boogers was RELATED to less heart disease I'd first ask people if they eat their own boogers and how many times do they do it (already a problem here)

I would ask children too (children eat their boogers all the time and have less heart disease because they are literal children you get where Im going), I then "track" these people for how many boogers they ate in the past month (they don't track they just give the guy a little clip paper to write) and then I'm done with my "study", I have now correlated eating boogers with less heart disease and am now pushing it to everyone to eat their own boogers.


The problem with these studies is that it is often external factors and lack of control that changes the outcome, but since it is so honed in and correlation based it doesn't matter, epidemiology studies are not based in science at all and don't claim to be.

not saying lycopene has no benefits though.
 
Epidemiology studies is why people now think eating vegetables and grains are good for you, while oatmeal is good and why fibre is actually beneficial, with 0 in-depth biochemistry involved at all. It is insane
 
Epidemiology studies is why people now think eating vegetables and grains are good for you, while oatmeal is good and why fibre is actually beneficial, with 0 in-depth biochemistry involved at all. It is insane
lemme pm you
 
lemme pm you
actually what am i doing...i wrote a whole 6 page paper with sources just because you mentioned biochemistry. fuark me

forget what i said
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top