Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

why .com is lowk better

Register to hide this ad
i meant like banning people for ER or nazi avis
I know you're not asking why we do this, but I thought I'd briefly explain quickly anyways.

.com is the most PR friendly site in the looksmaxxing community. We have journalists viewing and emailing Dean often. Dean will sometimes accept the interview and speak with them, where websites like .org normally refuse these types of interviews (not always to my understanding but y'know).

The problem with the ER comments / nazi images is they add nothing of value to the site, but risk the site's PR. I know a lot of people are used to their site owners running suicide forums and not giving a shit, but a majority of site owners actually care about this stuff. Dean is actually doing the correct thing by being open to journalists and by making the site more open to a broader audience.

If anyone were to do PR on behalf of the 'looksmaxxing' community, it should be .com and not someone else, in my opinion.

This is obviously not the only reason why we remove this content - It's not all purely a PR thing, it also has to do with the site's personal values - but it's something to keep in mind.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top