Join 65,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Why do men on Looksmaxxing forums deny the importance of body?

Deleted Member 107512

Active member
Joined
Feb 7, 2026
Messages
190
Time Online
1d 8h
Reputation
184
I'm gonna say something that's controversial, but face=/=attractiveness. Attractiveness is the SUM OF ALL PARTS.

I.E, let's use an example. Face 8/10, Height 8/10, Body 3/10. The averaged score is ~4.7/10.

Let's use a second example. Face 5/10. Height 5/10. Body 8/10. The averaged score is 6/10.

The 2nd is more attractive because the sum of their parts is greater.

None of these PSL Gods or Goddesses have good bodies; they cannot elicit genuine desire.

Looksmaxxers claim to "appeal to nature". They don't even do that. Health and youth markers are demonstrated BEYOND the face.

Also, if Looksmaxxers say that aspects of the body can exaggerated, then that applies to the face as well. It isn't just CurlyHairedJames and Jordan Barrett who ruined their face with surgeries. Plenty of face botches happen just like BBL botches.

If you think:

This

1000059270.webp


Is preferable to this

1000059271.webp


Just because the former might have better facial ratios, you know nothing about attractiveness.
 
Register to hide this ad
I'm gonna say something that's controversial, but face=/=attractiveness. Attractiveness is the SUM OF ALL PARTS.

I.E, let's use an example. Face 8/10, Height 8/10, Body 3/10. The averaged score is ~4.7/10.

Let's use a second example. Face 5/10. Height 5/10. Body 8/10. The averaged score is 6/10.

The 2nd is more attractive because the sum of their parts is greater.

None of these PSL Gods or Goddesses have good bodies; they cannot elicit genuine desire.

Looksmaxxers claim to "appeal to nature". They don't even do that. Health and youth markers are demonstrated BEYOND the face.

Also, if Looksmaxxers say that aspects of the body can exaggerated, then that applies to the face as well. It isn't just CurlyHairedJames and Jordan Barrett who ruined their face with surgeries. Plenty of face botches happen just like BBL botches.

If you think:

This

View attachment 288895

Is preferable to this

View attachment 288896

Just because the former might have better facial ratios, you know nothing about attractiveness.
its just retards, physique matters alot
 
I'm gonna say something that's controversial, but face=/=attractiveness. Attractiveness is the SUM OF ALL PARTS.

I.E, let's use an example. Face 8/10, Height 8/10, Body 3/10. The averaged score is ~4.7/10.

Let's use a second example. Face 5/10. Height 5/10. Body 8/10. The averaged score is 6/10.

The 2nd is more attractive because the sum of their parts is greater.

None of these PSL Gods or Goddesses have good bodies; they cannot elicit genuine desire.

Looksmaxxers claim to "appeal to nature". They don't even do that. Health and youth markers are demonstrated BEYOND the face.

Also, if Looksmaxxers say that aspects of the body can exaggerated, then that applies to the face as well. It isn't just CurlyHairedJames and Jordan Barrett who ruined their face with surgeries. Plenty of face botches happen just like BBL botches.

If you think:

This

View attachment 288895

Is preferable to this

View attachment 288896

Just because the former might have better facial ratios, you know nothing about attractiveness.
Prolly cause achieving a desired body is easier than achieving a desired face but yh both are imp.
 
ice spice looks like she has down syndrome
severely retarded if u choose her
Ice Spice doesn't have the best face, although she's not that lean either. She should drop down to 19% body fat. If nothing changes, she just doesn't have a good face. But even with a 4/10 face, she has a 9/10 body. So she's a 6.5/10.
 
I'm gonna say something that's controversial, but face=/=attractiveness. Attractiveness is the SUM OF ALL PARTS.
Finally someone gets it.
I.E, let's use an example. Face 8/10, Height 8/10, Body 3/10. The averaged score is ~4.7/10.

Let's use a second example. Face 5/10. Height 5/10. Body 8/10. The averaged score is 6/10.

The 2nd is more attractive because the sum of their parts is greater.
This is not how you should calculate attractiveness, different ratings will have different effects on the score and you should not weight individual aspects the same. Body matters, but nowhere near as much as face or height.
 
I'm gonna say something that's controversial, but face=/=attractiveness. Attractiveness is the SUM OF ALL PARTS.

I.E, let's use an example. Face 8/10, Height 8/10, Body 3/10. The averaged score is ~4.7/10.

Let's use a second example. Face 5/10. Height 5/10. Body 8/10. The averaged score is 6/10.

The 2nd is more attractive because the sum of their parts is greater.

None of these PSL Gods or Goddesses have good bodies; they cannot elicit genuine desire.

Looksmaxxers claim to "appeal to nature". They don't even do that. Health and youth markers are demonstrated BEYOND the face.

Also, if Looksmaxxers say that aspects of the body can exaggerated, then that applies to the face as well. It isn't just CurlyHairedJames and Jordan Barrett who ruined their face with surgeries. Plenty of face botches happen just like BBL botches.

If you think:

This

View attachment 288895

Is preferable to this

View attachment 288896

Just because the former might have better facial ratios, you know nothing about attractiveness.
HTN thread idk
 
I'm gonna say something that's controversial, but face=/=attractiveness. Attractiveness is the SUM OF ALL PARTS.

I.E, let's use an example. Face 8/10, Height 8/10, Body 3/10. The averaged score is ~4.7/10.

Let's use a second example. Face 5/10. Height 5/10. Body 8/10. The averaged score is 6/10.

The 2nd is more attractive because the sum of their parts is greater.

None of these PSL Gods or Goddesses have good bodies; they cannot elicit genuine desire.

Looksmaxxers claim to "appeal to nature". They don't even do that. Health and youth markers are demonstrated BEYOND the face.

Also, if Looksmaxxers say that aspects of the body can exaggerated, then that applies to the face as well. It isn't just CurlyHairedJames and Jordan Barrett who ruined their face with surgeries. Plenty of face botches happen just like BBL botches.

If you think:

This

View attachment 288895

Is preferable to this

View attachment 288896

Just because the former might have better facial ratios, you know nothing about attractiveness.
are you fr madeline bodies that clown
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top