Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

why do people think sub5 is under ltn

foidslayer

Do you like scary movies?
Contributor
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★
Joined
Dec 21, 2025
Messages
8,368
Solutions
6
Time Online
18d 4h
Reputation
21,108
why is this even a debated topic
 
Register to hide this ad
Im very confused. I never know if Ltn or Mtn is average. But I thought most people are Ltn
 
Im very confused. I never know if Ltn or Mtn is average. But I thought most people are Ltn
Most people are in ltn range indeed
 
Isn’t sub 5 just anround average? I remember the regular 1-8 scale and if you where sub 5 you lwk ok, so in the new rateing wouldn’t sub 5 include all of LTN
sub5 refers to the normie scale (1-10)

an ltn is around 4/10
sub5 is an ltn
 
Im very confused. I never know if Ltn or Mtn is average. But I thought most people are Ltn
average is hltn making it exactly 5/10 (because its average)
 
sub5 refers to the normie scale (1-10)

an ltn is around 4/10
sub5 is an ltn
how do they normally rate? Like normal people put the average at 7? So being sub 5 on a 1-10 scale is the same as sub 3 on a 1-8 scale
 
how do they normally rate? Like normal people put the average at 7? So being sub 5 on a 1-10 scale is the same as sub 3 on a 1-8 scale
yeah thats just glazing them 7/10 is an htn

the formula for it is your psl x 1.5 (around that i think)

for example a chadlite 5.5 psl

5.5 x 1.5 = 8.25 on the normie scale
 
Holy shit I’m down to have a chimp tear instead of say sub 3 or subhuman we can say high mid and low chimp
this is an example of a high tier chimp
 

Attachments

  • images-117.webp
    images-117.webp
    21.5 KB · Views: 3
No no that’s low tier for sure this would be like mid year
misusing the term, he is just your regular subhuman


The low to high tier chimp ranking is when someone genuinely doesn't resemble the homosapien species (could be mistaken for a neanderthal, homo erectus, etc)
 
misusing the term, he is just your regular subhuman


The low to high tier chimp ranking is when someone genuinely doesn't resemble the homosapien species (could be mistaken for a neanderthal, homo erectus, etc)
This is a good example



(Not being racist here, he genuinely just has the facial features of a ape 😭)
 

Attachments

  • Elly-Nsanzimana1.webp
    Elly-Nsanzimana1.webp
    16.7 KB · Views: 4
misusing the term, he is just your regular subhuman


The low to high tier chimp ranking is when someone genuinely doesn't resemble the homosapien species (could be mistaken for a neanderthal, homo erectus, etc)
But I want something to call Indians they keep falling in that low LTN spot when they should not be considered normies but sub human is also not quite right
 
dalit already exists bhai
 
This is a good example



(Not being racist here, he genuinely just has the facial features of a ape 😭)
Screenshot 2026-04-18 2.58.10 PM.webp
low tier chimp, this might be below low tier chimp tho
 
I think we should got sub human as like a raiting for Low LOW LTN
Chimps for really ugly people and then sub life or something
NOBODY is using these terms btw ✌️


i just made them up to add to the topic since it was related
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top