Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Why do religious people hate gays

I don't rlly remember where I heard it but I think its a myth cuz its genuinly spread around alot in the west
source "click on the video before its deleted , the real truth about all religions in 1 minute explained" ahh post
 
n*****s on here js be larping anything
how yd remember smtng ur not into it or never heard of
I've heard of it obviously. I'm actually pretty interested in studying religions even tho im not religious myself.
 
I've heard of it obviously. I'm actually pretty interested in studying religions even tho im not religious myself.
please make ur own research with alot of focus from trusted and a religious source without asking chat gpt 🙏
 
Is much deeper then environmental factors
exactly, there' many small genetic variations, hormone level differences in androgens/estrogens, how the brain develops very early, maybe epigentics (unsure).

but oddly enough upbringing/childhood/social stuff doesn't influence homosexuality

which is why when (some) christians or religious ppl in general unironically says pray the gay away rubs me the wrong way
 
exactly, there' many small genetic variations, hormone level differences in androgens/estrogens, how the brain develops very early, maybe epigentics (unsure).

but oddly enough upbringing/childhood/social stuff doesn't influence homosexuality
liked cuz of joe goldberg
 
exactly, there' many small genetic variations, hormone level differences in androgens/estrogens, how the brain develops very early, maybe epigentics (unsure).

but oddly enough upbringing/childhood/social stuff doesn't influence homosexuality
gold
 
yeah bro fuck off aint posting on this thread again its all non sense yall js retarded af and need to go for therapy 😭
 
they dont hate gays themselves they hate the action of doing it with the same gender

sometimes people can't control their emotions and thats okay but they can control their actions of being gay or whatever and it's a sin if they act on it
 
they dont hate gays themselves they hate the action of doing it with the same gender

sometimes people can't control their emotions and thats okay but they can control their actions of being gay or whatever and it's a sin if they act on it
But what makes it a sin? What makes it sinful? And even if it were, why would that matter to you? To each their own as they say. Even in the case that it were a sin, why would you care? They'd be the ones (in theory) going to hell, not you. Why dont you just practice your religious beliefs, and let others fuck who they wanna fuck. Then everyone's happy.
 
But what makes it a sin? What makes it sinful? And even if it were, why would that matter to you? To each their own as they say. Even in the case that it were a sin, why would you care? They'd be the ones (in theory) going to hell, not you. Why dont you just practice your religious beliefs, and let others fuck who they wanna fuck. Then everyone's happy.
Yeah I don't gaf about the gays js aslong as they stay away from me you're not supposed to care about other people's business aslong as they don't harm you

Me personally I have to research it more I don't know everything but from what I know gay sex specifically has an increased chance of producing diseases. Not to mention the fact that in the epstein files themselves they're talking about demasculinizing men and turning them gay, probably to lower the population. They're using this as a way to further their control over us like cattle. Look at the 60s for example I'd guarantee you it was a slither of the population that was gay. Now it's millions, being gay also has an overlap with having autism. You're convincing a part of the population that aren't in their best minds that they're something they're not. it's like telling a violent psychopath it's okay to kill. Being a psychopath is normal but killing isn't, it's the same analogy
 
Yeah I don't gaf about the gays js aslong as they stay away from me you're not supposed to care about other people's business aslong as they don't harm you

Me personally I have to research it more I don't know everything but from what I know gay sex specifically has an increased chance of producing diseases. Not to mention the fact that in the epstein files themselves they're talking about demasculinizing men and turning them gay, probably to lower the population. They're using this as a way to further their control over us like cattle. Look at the 60s for example I'd guarantee you it was a slither of the population that was gay. Now it's millions, being gay also has an overlap with having autism. You're convincing a part of the population that aren't in their best minds that they're something they're not. it's like telling a violent psychopath it's okay to kill. Being a psychopath is normal but killing isn't, it's the same analogy
So, the first thing about higher risk of STIs is true, but only specifically for gay men, due to the way sex between them works. Im not sure about the Epstein files but they also spoke about eating babies so id take that with a grain of salt, and on top of that you can't turn people gay, its not possible, one is born that way. People dont just turn homosexual. The thing about the 60s may be true but its important to note that these days people just feel a lot safer to come out, as homosexuality is widely far far more accepted than almost 70 years back. Back then, of course the documented number of gay people was lower because most were too scared to tell anyone. The rates concerning the autism are also documented and true but not as much of a conspiracy as youre making it out to be. Autistic people often process social constructs differently and may feel less bound by arbitrary societal expectations or heteronormative rules. Because they already operate outside traditional social scripts, they may be much more open to recognizing, accepting, and expressing their actual sexual orientation, making an overlap more common. The psychopath analogy is flawed because killing somebody is morally wrong and ends someones life, it harms another person, being gay does not do that wether you act on it or not.
 
So, the first thing about higher risk of STIs is true, but only specifically for gay men, due to the way sex between them works. Im not sure about the Epstein files but they also spoke about eating babies so id take that with a grain of salt, and on top of that you can't turn people gay, its not possible, one is born that way. People dont just turn homosexual. The thing about the 60s may be true but its important to note that these days people just feel a lot safer to come out, as homosexuality is widely far far more accepted than almost 70 years back. Back then, of course the documented number of gay people was lower because most were too scared to tell anyone. The rates concerning the autism are also documented and true but not as much of a conspiracy as youre making it out to be. Autistic people often process social constructs differently and may feel less bound by arbitrary societal expectations or heteronormative rules. Because they already operate outside traditional social scripts, they may be much more open to recognizing, accepting, and expressing their actual sexual orientation, making an overlap more common. The psychopath analogy is flawed because killing somebody is morally wrong and ends someones life, it harms another person, being gay does not do that wether you act on it or not.
You infact can turn people gay. Most people are gay by choice and propaganda during their teens leading them to believe they're gay. Being gay doesn't harm society? You were made to be able to repopulate the earth, being gay and stripping yourself from that role during marriage does infact harm society. It doesn't even matter because they're killing themselves off for us, so we don't have to do anything to stop them. Matter of fact I think it's good that low IQ people aren't populating the earth anymore
 
You infact can turn people gay. Most people are gay by choice and propaganda during their teens leading them to believe they're gay. Being gay doesn't harm society? You were made to be able to repopulate the earth, being gay and stripping yourself from that role during marriage does infact harm society. It doesn't even matter because they're killing themselves off for us, so we don't have to do anything to stop them. Matter of fact I think it's good that low IQ people aren't populating the earth anymore
not to mention as openminded autistic people are they're easily influenced.
 
You infact can turn people gay. Most people are gay by choice and propaganda during their teens leading them to believe they're gay. Being gay doesn't harm society? You were made to be able to repopulate the earth, being gay and stripping yourself from that role during marriage does infact harm society. It doesn't even matter because they're killing themselves off for us, so we don't have to do anything to stop them. Matter of fact I think it's good that low IQ people aren't populating the earth anymore
Your first claim isn't supported by the scientific evidence. Sexual orientation isn't understood as something you can simply “teach” someone into having. The exact causes of sexual orientation are complex and aren't reduced to a single factor, but there is no good evidence that exposure to LGBT acceptance or “propaganda” can reliably make heterosexual people homosexual.
Also, there's an important distinction between coming to recognize that you're gay and being "turned" gay. Someone might realize they're gay at 16 after previously assuming they were straight, but that doesn't mean something turned them gay at 16.
People arent gay because they choose to be. There is teens who commit suicide because theyre parents dont accept their lifestyle, or because they hate themselves due to what their religion has thought them. Dont you think theyd rather live than make that choice? Dont you think they'd choose to be straight if they could?
Another claim youre making is “Being gay harms society because humans are made to repopulate” There are multiple problems with that argument.
First off, people do not have to reproduce simply because it continues on the human species. There is plenty of straight people who choose not to have kids, yet we dont scrutinise them the same way we do gay people. Second off, gay people can have kids through surrogacy for example or assisted reproduction or previous heterosexual relationships. The rest of your argument gets into eugenics, and isn't really an argument against homosexuality anymore but just a much more extreme position. Youre just saying its better if people who you consider "low iq" dont reproduce which is a fundamentally different position and not something i agree with, but also not something im going to argue now as id have to get into a whole different topic entirely.
 
You infact can turn people gay. Most people are gay by choice and propaganda during their teens leading them to believe they're gay. Being gay doesn't harm society? You were made to be able to repopulate the earth, being gay and stripping yourself from that role during marriage does infact harm society. It doesn't even matter because they're killing themselves off for us, so we don't have to do anything to stop them. Matter of fact I think it's good that low IQ people aren't populating the earth anymore
off-topic but i think in the future we're going to have a small group of superhumans as the cost of children increases and hordes of bastards as low iq poor people continue reproducing like rabbits. bc the only ppl producing good children that contribute to society will be the ultra wealthy
 
I don’t think we should hate anyone. But many look down on them bc homosexuality is a sin.
But also many tend to believe being gay is like the end all be all. They will be fine with ppl drinking,smoking, and sex before marriage but not gay ppl. Which shows ignorance as all sins are equal. Some ppls religious views are skewed based on society.
how is being gay a sin??
 
Yeah I don't gaf about the gays js aslong as they stay away from me you're not supposed to care about other people's business aslong as they don't harm you

Me personally I have to research it more I don't know everything but from what I know gay sex specifically has an increased chance of producing diseases. Not to mention the fact that in the epstein files themselves they're talking about demasculinizing men and turning them gay, probably to lower the population. They're using this as a way to further their control over us like cattle. Look at the 60s for example I'd guarantee you it was a slither of the population that was gay. Now it's millions, being gay also has an overlap with having autism. You're convincing a part of the population that aren't in their best minds that they're something they're not. it's like telling a violent psychopath it's okay to kill. Being a psychopath is normal but killing isn't, it's the same analogy
yeah having anal sex is terrible for ur health but u missed the point completely
 
Another claim youre making is “Being gay harms society because humans are made to repopulate” There are multiple problems with that argument.
First off, people do not have to reproduce simply because it continues on the human species. There is plenty of straight people who choose not to have kids, yet we dont scrutinise them the same way we do gay people. Second off, gay people can have kids through surrogacy for example or assisted reproduction or previous heterosexual relationships.
The biggest problem with the repopulation argument is that it confuses "natural (or evolutional) desire" with "primary purpose or function". Just because we've developed an evolutional desire to do something doesn't mean that's now our primary function, goal, or sole purpose in life lmfao. We know this is not true because we experience *checks notes* consciousness and we can *check notes* do what we want.

It's like making the argument we're evolutionally designed to have hair so shaving is wrong. Literally nobody is going to make that argument because we have a basic understanding that just because something is biologically true it doesn't mean we no longer have a choice? That it's the "correct" way to live life?

It's ridiculous to boil the entirety of human existence to making babies anyways, and only people who don't have anything to live for believe that to be the ultimate path (usually young kids who haven't experienced life). It rewrites the entire existence of humans (we're superior BECAUSE we do shit outside of repopulation) and it doesn't even make sense in a religious context.
 
The biggest problem with the repopulation argument is that it confuses "natural (or evolutional) desire" with "primary purpose or function". Just because we've developed an evolutional desire to do something doesn't mean that's now our primary function, goal, or sole purpose in life lmfao. We know this is not true because we experience *checks notes* consciousness and we can *check notes* do what we want.

It's like making the argument we're evolutionally designed to have hair so shaving is wrong. Literally nobody is going to make that argument because we have a basic understanding that just because something is biologically true it doesn't mean we no longer have a choice? That it's the "correct" way to live life?

It's ridiculous to boil the entirety of human existence to making babies anyways, and only people who don't have anything to live for believe that to be the ultimate path (usually young kids who haven't experienced life). It rewrites the entire existence of humans (we're superior BECAUSE we do shit outside of repopulation) and it doesn't even make sense in a religious context.
I completely agree with everything said here. I think a lot of people struggle to grasp this view because they require an obvious and one way answer to the question "what is ones purpose in life" and without much further thought, "reproduce" would seem like a fairly simple answer to that very complex question. If people let go of the need to have one sole purpose throughout life, and then attempting to apply that purpose to everyone else in the world, they may find a lot more freedom in life, and they may feel more content with letting others be free in life.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top