- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Messages
- 589
- Solutions
- 1
- Reputation
- 836
For context, read https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/threads/why-east-asian-men-are-superior-to-you.246375/ which serves the foundation to my contentions
What defines an ethnic?
- Poor
- Violent
- Dumb
- Dark Skin
- Rapey
- Ugly
- Short
- Beards/Mustaches
- Extremely Religious
This applies to people of varying shades of brown (from pajeet to sand n****r to med to filthy jew to beaner to black). However, NEAs only meet 1 category (Ugly).
NEAs are actually really civilized people and they don't do the shit that pisses me off that brown/black people do.
They have basically no crime both in their native countries and in the West
High income both in native countries and in the West
High IQ both in native countries and in the West
Relatively tall (or at least not as short as actual ethnics)
Aren't rapey both at home and in the West apart from Japan being kinda perverted. But taking upskirt pictures of women is a VERY minor problem compared gangraping women at home or gangraping white girls in the West that actual ethnics do.
Mostly aren't religious and dont have disgusting facial hair that jeets/terrorists/meds/filthy jews/beaners/blacks tend to have.
They should be considered "honorary true whites" and be seen as just half a tier below lower-tier true whites like Nordics but a tier below upper-tier true whites like WASPs/Germanics/Dutch.
I would rather have my white neighborhood become 25% NEA than become 1% actual ethnic.
The only downside to c****s is that they're ugly to look at due to maxillary recession, seemingly perma-bloat regardless of bodyfat as well as no browridge and ugly ass monolids, but that's a small price to pay to avoid actual ethnics.
Saying this as a WA
P Anglo AXON. INB4 Ethnic faggots and mutts come in to envy the superior NEAs.
What defines an ethnic?
- Poor
- Violent
- Dumb
- Dark Skin
- Rapey
- Ugly
- Short
- Beards/Mustaches
- Extremely Religious
This applies to people of varying shades of brown (from pajeet to sand n****r to med to filthy jew to beaner to black). However, NEAs only meet 1 category (Ugly).
NEAs are actually really civilized people and they don't do the shit that pisses me off that brown/black people do.
They have basically no crime both in their native countries and in the West
High income both in native countries and in the West
High IQ both in native countries and in the West
Relatively tall (or at least not as short as actual ethnics)
Aren't rapey both at home and in the West apart from Japan being kinda perverted. But taking upskirt pictures of women is a VERY minor problem compared gangraping women at home or gangraping white girls in the West that actual ethnics do.
Mostly aren't religious and dont have disgusting facial hair that jeets/terrorists/meds/filthy jews/beaners/blacks tend to have.
They should be considered "honorary true whites" and be seen as just half a tier below lower-tier true whites like Nordics but a tier below upper-tier true whites like WASPs/Germanics/Dutch.
I would rather have my white neighborhood become 25% NEA than become 1% actual ethnic.
The only downside to c****s is that they're ugly to look at due to maxillary recession, seemingly perma-bloat regardless of bodyfat as well as no browridge and ugly ass monolids, but that's a small price to pay to avoid actual ethnics.
Saying this as a WA
P Anglo AXON. INB4 Ethnic faggots and mutts come in to envy the superior NEAs.
