Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Rage why tf this got 8 reps

Mota said:
your definition of a language being “superior” is subjective too n***a 😭 just thinking that a language is superior cause it’s universal it’s funny af.
Click to expand...
It’s objective that English is more wide spread and generally used, it’s subjective that a language has better grammar or is easier
 
ey88 said:
It’s objective that English is more wide spread and generally used, it’s subjective that a language has better grammar or is easier
Click to expand...
yes. and what?

it’s not objective that a language is superior cause there’s more speakers. that’s your dumb metric n***a.
 
Mota said:
yes. and what?

it’s not objective that a language is superior cause there’s more speakers. that’s your dumb metric n***a.
Click to expand...
Even if a different language had slightly better grammar or is easier (even tho it’s subjective) the benefit of wide spread use of English blows it out the water
 
THIS n***a REPLIED TO ME AGAIN HELP ME OMFG HES SO FUCKING FUMB
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top