Hypothesis Why The Hate For AI?

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

I can never understand the pure fear and hate for machinery. I think AI is a perfectly fine concept if in the right hands. I understand the worry of the rising prices of ram and other computer parts that are needed yet I have to ask. What do those people use those machine parts for? To play video games all day? If the people complaining were developers, designers, coders or some other sort of worker that needs high processing power of a machine then yes, I would understand yet most people who use computers are just men with no life skills. Do not get wrong, I understand the issue but I think the advancement of a new tool can be favourable once legally controlled and established.

The things personally I would want AI to have is better laws around it. Mostly with copyright for music, art and writing. I do not want it to copy other people's works and I think there should be a serious pact that forces the companies and firms behind AI variants to give out a consent forum to people who own copyright material such images, photos, videos, concepts, writing, books or anything so it would not complicate the creative medium space. That and it would put the original creators of the so called property to peace as it is rightfully their IPs. Not the machine.

For another pointless fear is the one that people have for skynet. I can promise you, AI is nothing but a tool. If you treat it as such, then it will be a tool but if you treat something as a replacement? Then you get replaced. We had this pattern countless times play out in history, I do not think it is hard to avoid when the same moral matter is at hand. In the end, I think it is a usual tool; in relation to things like auto correct or a spell checker that is more advanced.

 

[nate]

People are acting like AI is some endgame boss that’s gonna wipe the lobby, when really it’s just another tool — like a new weapon you’ve got to learn how to use properly. Sure, some players are mad because PC parts are getting pricey, but a lot of them just use their rigs to grind Creative mode, not actually build the game.

The writer says what we really need are good “rules of the match” — laws that stop AI from stealing skins (music, art, writing, etc.) and make sure the OG creators keep ownership of their drops.

Basically, AI isn’t Skynet — it’s more like an upgraded auto-aim assist. If you use it smart, it helps you win. If you expect it to play the whole match for you, that’s when you lose

 

[Thebird]

I can never understand the pure fear and hate for machinery. I think AI is a perfectly fine concept if in the right hands. I understand the worry of the rising prices of ram and other computer parts that are needed yet I have to ask. What do those people use those machine parts for? To play video games all day? If the people complaining were developers, designers, coders or some other sort of worker that needs high processing power of a machine then yes, I would understand yet most people who use computers are just men with no life skills. Do not get wrong, I understand the issue but I think the advancement of a new tool can be favourable once legally controlled and established.

The things personally I would want AI to have is better laws around it. Mostly with copyright for music, art and writing. I do not want it to copy other people's works and I think there should be a serious pact that forces the companies and firms behind AI variants to give out a consent forum to people who own copyright material such images, photos, videos, concepts, writing, books or anything so it would not complicate the creative medium space. That and it would put the original creators of the so called property to peace as it is rightfully their IPs. Not the machine.

For another pointless fear is the one that people have for skynet. I can promise you, AI is nothing but a tool. If you treat it as such, then it will be a tool but if you treat something as a replacement? Then you get replaced. We had this pattern countless times play out in history, I do not think it is hard to avoid when the same moral matter is at hand. In the end, I think it is a usual tool; in relation to things like auto correct or a spell checker that is more advanced.

Viktor Orban ai porn

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

I can never understand the pure fear and hate for machinery. I think AI is a perfectly fine concept if in the right hands. I understand the worry of the rising prices of ram and other computer parts that are needed yet I have to ask. What do those people use those machine parts for? To play video games all day? If the people complaining were developers, designers, coders or some other sort of worker that needs high processing power of a machine then yes, I would understand yet most people who use computers are just men with no life skills. Do not get wrong, I understand the issue but I think the advancement of a new tool can be favourable once legally controlled and established.

The things personally I would want AI to have is better laws around it. Mostly with copyright for music, art and writing. I do not want it to copy other people's works and I think there should be a serious pact that forces the companies and firms behind AI variants to give out a consent forum to people who own copyright material such images, photos, videos, concepts, writing, books or anything so it would not complicate the creative medium space. That and it would put the original creators of the so called property to peace as it is rightfully their IPs. Not the machine.

For another pointless fear is the one that people have for skynet. I can promise you, AI is nothing but a tool. If you treat it as such, then it will be a tool but if you treat something as a replacement? Then you get replaced. We had this pattern countless times play out in history, I do not think it is hard to avoid when the same moral matter is at hand. In the end, I think it is a usual tool; in relation to things like auto correct or a spell checker that is more advanced.

n***a was just hating on me for using ai

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

People are acting like AI is some endgame boss that’s gonna wipe the lobby, when really it’s just another tool — like a new weapon you’ve got to learn how to use properly. Sure, some players are mad because PC parts are getting pricey, but a lot of them just use their rigs to grind Creative mode, not actually build the game.

The writer says what we really need are good “rules of the match” — laws that stop AI from stealing skins (music, art, writing, etc.) and make sure the OG creators keep ownership of their drops.

Basically, AI isn’t Skynet — it’s more like an upgraded auto-aim assist. If you use it smart, it helps you win. If you expect it to play the whole match for you, that’s when you lose

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

n***a was just hating on me for using ai

Was this post about that?

 

[sparkle]

People are acting like AI is some endgame boss that’s gonna wipe the lobby, when really it’s just another tool — like a new weapon you’ve got to learn how to use properly. Sure, some players are mad because PC parts are getting pricey, but a lot of them just use their rigs to grind Creative mode, not actually build the game.

The writer says what we really need are good “rules of the match” — laws that stop AI from stealing skins (music, art, writing, etc.) and make sure the OG creators keep ownership of their drops.

Basically, AI isn’t Skynet — it’s more like an upgraded auto-aim assist. If you use it smart, it helps you win. If you expect it to play the whole match for you, that’s when you lose

LOL

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

Was this post about that?

what was that about then

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

View attachment 269160View attachment 269161View attachment 269162
what was that about then

That was about you, not the machine. Are you that dense?

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

That was about you, not the machine. Are you that dense?

why me about using a tool

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

why me about using a tool

There is a difference between using something as a tool and then having it talk for you.

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

There is a difference between using something as a tool and then having it talk for you.

arbitrary distinction

 

[Deleted Member 99582]

"ai" is just google with extra steps

 

[Deleted Member 103414]

I think AI is a perfectly fine concept if in the right hands.

This is where the stigma comes from. The world leaders and tech companies frontiers are not good people. They're all trying to bankrupt you and serve some greater purpose. Nick Land talks about AI from quite an anti-humanistic point of view (and its link with capitalism), seeing them as a natural successor to humans. It's quite interesting to read up about.

The things personally I would want AI to have is better laws around it. Mostly with copyright for music, art and writing.

I feel that this is a must. AI has no originality, at least, not yet. We've got to wait until the crack the code of AGIs, and maybe they can form a psuedo-consciousness or something.

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

"ai" is just google with extra steps

Quite so.

This is where the stigma comes from. The world leaders and tech companies frontiers are not good people. They're all trying to bankrupt you and serve some greater purpose. Nick Land talks about AI from quite an anti-humanistic point of view (and its like with capitalism), seeing them as a natural successor to humans. It's quite interesting to read up about.


I feel that this is a must. AI has no originality, at least, not yet. We've got to wait until the crack the code of AGIs, and maybe they can form a psuedo-consciousness or something.

Better to leave it be. We are fine as is, we do not need to create another race if we can.

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

This is where the stigma comes from. The world leaders and tech companies frontiers are not good people. They're all trying to bankrupt you and serve some greater purpose. Nick Land talks about AI from quite an anti-humanistic point of view (and its like with capitalism), seeing them as a natural successor to humans. It's quite interesting to read up about.

no ppl are literal chimps
also are u against capitalism?

I feel that this is a must. AI has no originality, at least, not yet. We've got to wait until the crack the code of AGIs, and maybe they can form a psuedo-consciousness or something.

never
ai will always be a mega copy of humanity

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

"ai" is just google with extra steps

llm isnt the only ai

 

[zayη]

There will be always people who won't play fairly

 

[Deleted Member 103414]

no ppl are literal chimps
also are u against capitalism?

Of course not, I'd be more anarcho-capitalist than anything. But I do believe that we should have a government, just a small government.

never
ai will always be a mega copy of humanity

I'd say that AI will just be slaves to humanity, and nothing bad will happen (except for radicals complaining against it). AI discovering accidental conscience is a fanciful fairy tale.

 

[zayη]

There will be always people who won't play fairly

Restricting access to masses won't make it disappear

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

Of course not, I'd be more anarcho-capitalist than anything. But I do believe that we should have a government, just a small government.


I'd say that AI will just be slaves to humanity, and nothing bad will happen (except for radicals complaining against it). AI discovering accidental conscience is a fanciful fairy tale.

I prefer technocratic fascism. It works globally whilst being seperate from one another.

 

[Deleted Member 103414]

I prefer technocratic fascism. It works globally whilst being seperate from one another.

If it eliminates democracy, I'm for it. Democracy has failed us, meritocracy is natural.

 

[Anna]

Ai is absolute slop

The same kind of garbage the elites want to shove down our throats like the meta verse it’s ridiculous

 

[Anna]

If it eliminates democracy, I'm for it. Democracy has failed us, meritocracy is natural.

I’m too low iq to know what allat means tbh

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

Of course not, I'd be more anarcho-capitalist than anything. But I do believe that we should have a government, just a small government.


I'd say that AI will just be slaves to humanity, and nothing bad will happen (except for radicals complaining against it). AI discovering accidental conscience is a fanciful fairy tale.

u r ancap

it has a lot of freedom
thats why i like it
but thats the reason i also dislike it
i dont wanna witness baby corpses mummified and sold as sex dolls or animal torture r**e porn

 

[Deleted Member 103414]

I’m too low iq to know what allat means tbh

Democracy = Equal power in elections, government, etc. "We all get equal chances!"
Meritocracy = Selective power in elections, government, etc. "Only the best get to elect."

It's as clear as day when you realise not all opinions are equal. A political scientist will be far more valuable compared to the uninformed Trumpie.

 

[Deleted Member 103414]

u r ancap

it has a lot of freedom
thats why i like it
but thats the reason i also dislike it
i dont wanna baby corpses mummified and sold as sex dolls or animal torture r**e porn
View attachment 269167

I'd lean towards it, but we still need solid government/societal structure. As you said, too much free will is bad.

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

I'd lean towards it, but we still need solid government/societal structure. As you said, too much free will is bad.

yes
i need minarchist monarchy with my son or grandson as king

 

[Anna]

Democracy = Equal power in elections, government, etc. "We all get equal chances!"
Meritocracy = Selective power in elections, government, etc. "Only the best get to elect."

It's as clear as day when you realise not all opinions are equal. A political scientist will be far more valuable compared to the uninformed Trumpie.

Oh right okay

So it’s like for example how it used to be in England in the past when only certain landowners for example got to vote?

 

[Deleted Member 103414]

Oh right okay

So it’s like for example how it used to be in England in the past when only certain landowners for example got to vote?

Yeah, I would side with this kind of voting.

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

If it eliminates democracy, I'm for it. Democracy has failed us, meritocracy is natural.

It was always a trap to destroy the middle class and the working people. It creates false conflict and it is easy to trick people by making one right and left wing. What do those wings matter when the bird is rotten?

 

[Anna]

Yeah, I would side with this kind of voting.

Yeah tbh I kinda see the logic to it as well

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

I'd lean towards it, but we still need solid government/societal structure. As you said, too much free will is bad.

hoppe tries to solve this by muh covenant communities
but if u don't consent to being member u can do whatever
outside of community whatever will happen

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

Oh right okay

So it’s like for example how it used to be in England in the past when only certain landowners for example got to vote?

that was not optimal but yea
also voting in general is bad
creates instability and isnt really the best thing

 

[Anna]

that was not optimal but yea
also voting in general is bad
creates instability and isnt really the best thing

Don’t you think on matters that effect, for example a small town voting is good

A vote is necessary as someone on our behalf might not have all the knowledge that the villagers do?

 

[RAJ GHRANDHICK]

Don’t you think on matters that effect, for example a small town voting is good

A vote is necessary as someone on our behalf might not have all the knowledge that the villagers do?

voting essentially only works in small communities