Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Women don’t have to be attractive

Register to hide this ad
1742694378285.png

1742694397526.png
 
There’s not a woman without makeup unfrauded above a HTN
that’s because makeup exists, we need to count this factor.

if we always saw women without makeup, the ratings would adapt under those circumstances
 
that’s because makeup exists, we need to count this factor.

if we always saw women without makeup, the ratings would adapt under those circumstances
But we have makeup and it puts them all on the same tier. Anyways men are meant to be more attractive in nature anyways
 
But we have makeup and it puts them all on the same tier. Anyways men are meant to be more attractive in nature anyways
I don’t think it puts them all on the same tier, genetics are the most important factor, that’s why mtbs, htbs, lites still exist
 
I don’t think it puts them all on the same tier, genetics are the most important factor, that’s why mtbs, htbs, lites still exist
Gng most of the time they all look the same and have same sex appeal
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top