would uou rather

[winterfoid]

someone who understands and relates to you completely but cannot provide anything else of substance

or someone who meets your every physical/emotional need but will never relate to or understand you in any capacity

 

[Blackpillirony]

someone who understands and relates to you completely but cannot provide anything else of substance

or someone who meets your every physical/emotional need but will never relate to or understand you in any capacity

Second, I don't need a romantic partner that perfectly understands how I feel and even less relates to me.

 

[arzzey]

second one, im vain

 

[emeraldpill]

Die

 

[junebug]

second one

i would NOT want to date someone like me

 

[Deleted Member 105829]

Second

 

[Nenestar]

Latter. Physical and emotional needs come first

 

[arisu]

someone who understands and relates to you completely but cannot provide anything else of substance

or someone who meets your every physical/emotional need but will never relate to or understand you in any capacity

second bc if i don’t even like myself how am i going to fall for someone like me

 

[trvecel]

someone who understands and relates to you completely but cannot provide anything else of substance

or someone who meets your every physical/emotional need but will never relate to or understand you in any capacity

2nd, nobody should relate to me, I'm my own person

 

[Starlet]

someone who understands and relates to you completely but cannot provide anything else of substance

or someone who meets your every physical/emotional need but will never relate to or understand you in any capacity

how would they even meet your emotional needs in the first place if they can’t understand you

 

[winterfoid]

how would they even meet your emotional needs in the first place if they can’t understand you

its assuming that you're communicating your needs to them. by understanding i mean on more of a personal level not just basic empathy. if one of your needs is that then just assume its omitted for the sake of the question