Serious Ye ye come here and have a seat yo

[ItzyaboyJJ💯]

This is the first time I've mentioned abo in months bro

Ion care your talking about some dead group and dragging us into it

 

[Rav3nPSL]

Yeah based, I would say the same or worse I hate these ABO ethnic faggots

Also this, I don't like this racism

Ion care your talking about some dead group and dragging us into it

 

[ShitUsername]

Also this, I don't like this racism

Ok

 

[ItzyaboyJJ💯]

Also this, I don't like this racism

He’s ethnic himself so it’s like not racism if that makes sense my nga

 

[Rav3nPSL]

He’s ethnic himself so it’s like not racism if that makes sense my nga

Self racism is worse

 

[ShitUsername]

He’s ethnic himself so it’s like not racism if that makes sense my nga

True I'm a self hating ethnic like @milkjar

 

[Rav3nPSL]

True I'm a self hating ethnic like @milkjar

If you're brown we can still be nice to you
We just gotta brown heart it

 

[ShitUsername]

If you're brown we can still be nice to you
We just gotta brown heart it

Thanks bhai

 

[Rav3nPSL]

Dnr but who’s the mogger in the picture

This is so gay coded now that i think abt it
@Marlonmogsyouhaha thoughts

 

[Chifuyu]

This is so gay coded now that i think abt it
@Marlonmogsyouhaha thoughts

For some reason, people irl think I’m gay but I’ve never said shit about wanting to suck dicks or some gay shit. I just don’t look talk about women and so they think I’m gay.

 

[Rav3nPSL]

For some reason, people irl think I’m gay but I’ve never said shit about wanting to suck dicks or some gay shit. I just don’t look talk about women and so they think I’m gay.

Gay doesnt always mean sexual fantasies, so you can look deeper into that fs

 

[Rav3nPSL]

@Gengar Have you inspected the closet yet

 

[Auggy]

View attachment 279415@kifykify didn't post any illegal shit. Idek where the cp claim came from tbh, the most he ever posted was futa cock which is very fucking different.

Even the mods know he didn't do anything like that
View attachment 279416
So ye ye stop spreading that shit

Unban @kifykify

 

[ItzyaboyJJ💯]

This shi still going just unban the black Argentinian rapper YouTube guy

 

[trueceljester]

Unban @kifykify

Me gusta kify, no me gusta mods and admins not unbanning

 

[Rav3nPSL]

Me gusta kify, no me gusta mods and admins not unbanning

i do not approve of the staff, well they seem to be young girls and femboys

 

[trueceljester]

i do not approve of the staff, well they seem to be young girls and femboys

Not one femboy in the staff team, just a lot of foids

 

[Deleted Member 46433]

i fully understand why he was banned, but i agree that people shouldnt spread that he sent cp as thats a crazy accusation

 

[trueceljester]

i fully understand why he was banned, but i agree that people shouldnt spread that he sent cp as thats a crazy accusation

He got banned for hentai rite?

 

[Deleted Member 46433]

He got banned for hentai rite?

no. saying that would be misleading

 

[trueceljester]

no. saying that would be misleading

What exactly happened, I'm not tapped into the lore

 

[Deleted Member 46433]

What exactly happened, I'm not tapped into the lore

i can explain it, but it will be long. one second

 

[Anna]

i fully understand why he was banned, but i agree that people shouldnt spread that he sent cp as thats a crazy accusation

wyd if ur at the hairdresser and the n***a next to u asks the lady for a “short back and sides spuffy on top please mate” and then they lowkey give her a low taper fade?

 

[Deleted Member 46433]

i can explain it, but it will be long. one second

this is purely explaining why he got banned since i am a mod after all. i dont care for this situation.

for background: the main point im seeing is that kifykify was in a bad thread. the thread was posting porn and gore stuff. he didnt post porn and gore, but he posted one "nsfw" pic that was meant to be funny if i were to guess(the hentai). then, all of the users in that thread were permabanned. the supposed problem is that he is not being reconsidered for an unban, even though he only posted one nsfw pic and 'barely did anything wrong'. so, in a way, he deserves an unban and this is unfair. this is the common complaint im seeing.
----------------------------------------------------------
this is what i would like to explain:
the ban was based on group behavior, not on a single isolated image. multiple users coordinated by joining the forum with matching profile pictures, clearly signaling themselves as a group. one member of that group created a thread and began posting pornographic and graphic gore. a second member joined and escalated by posting more porn and gore. a third member, kifykify, also entered the thread, laughed along, and contributed by posting pornographic material himself while replying to one of the prior members. additionally in the same reply, this user made a pedophilic remark, which was weird especially regarding its context, even if it were a joke. i would go back and look for specifics, however it was perma deleted due to the severity of the content in the thread

while it is true that this user posted less extreme content than the others, that does not make his participation acceptable or separate from the incident. he knowingly joined a thread with the purpose being to send rule breaking and permabannable content, encouraged the behavior through participation, and added his own material to it. because the group presented itself as coordinated and acted together in the same thread, all participants were treated as part of the same incident. the moderation decision was not based on who crossed the line the furthest. the users made it quite clear that they wanted to be identified as a group (and also made it quite clear they wanted to be permabanned imo). but all of a sudden when kifykify hasnt been given a chance to be unbanned, he is fighting/defending for only himself and how he "did the least" of the group.

for these reasons, he is not seen as an innocent bystander. it was a coordinated group engaging in behavior thats not allowed, and that is why the ban stands if i were to guess. dean said he stays banned, so theres no further arguing about it really. im sad for him that cp rumors are being spread though, and i will always disprove that

wyd if ur at the hairdresser and the n***a next to u asks the lady for a “short back and sides spuffy on top please mate” and then they lowkey give her a low taper fade?

i would start to panic and run out of the store. i would think somebody is messing with me

 

[Blackpillirony]

this is purely explaining why he got banned since i am a mod after all. i dont care for this situation.

for background: the main point im seeing is that kifykify was in a bad thread. the thread was posting porn and gore stuff. he didnt post porn and gore, but he posted one "nsfw" pic that was meant to be funny if i were to guess(the hentai). then, all of the users in that thread were permabanned. the supposed problem is that he is not being reconsidered for an unban, even though he only posted one nsfw pic and 'barely did anything wrong'. so, in a way, he deserves an unban and this is unfair. this is the common complaint im seeing.
----------------------------------------------------------
this is what i would like to explain:
the ban was based on group behavior, not on a single isolated image. multiple users coordinated by joining the forum with matching profile pictures, clearly signaling themselves as a group. one member of that group created a thread and began posting pornographic and graphic gore. a second member joined and escalated by posting more porn and gore. a third member, kifykify, also entered the thread, laughed along, and contributed by posting pornographic material himself while replying to one of the prior members. additionally in the same reply, this user made a pedophilic remark, which was weird especially regarding its context, even if it were a joke. i would go back and look for specifics, however it was perma deleted due to the severity of the content in the thread

while it is true that this user posted less extreme content than the others, that does not make his participation acceptable or separate from the incident. he knowingly joined a thread with the purpose being to send rule breaking and permabannable content, encouraged the behavior through participation, and added his own material to it. because the group presented itself as coordinated and acted together in the same thread, all participants were treated as part of the same incident. the moderation decision was not based on who crossed the line the furthest. the users made it quite clear that they wanted to be identified as a group (and also made it quite clear they wanted to be permabanned imo). but all of a sudden when kifykify hasnt been given a chance to be unbanned, he is fighting/defending for only himself and how he "did the least" of the group.

for these reasons, he is not seen as an innocent bystander. it was a coordinated group engaging in behavior thats not allowed, and that is why the ban stands if i were to guess. dean said he stays banned, so theres no further arguing about it really. im sad for him that cp rumors are being spread though, and i will always disprove that


i would start to panic and run out of the store. i would think somebody is messing with me

Who started those CP claims tho ? Kifykify is from what I know not an user who constantly challenged the rules or anything. Even if he did coordinate with a group to post pornography, his individual actions should be taken into account for his ban or not. Is there any way you or another mod could plead for his unban ?

 

[Anna]

i would start to panic and run out of the store. i would think somebody is messing with me

Same

 

[Blackpillirony]

this is purely explaining why he got banned since i am a mod after all. i dont care for this situation.

for background: the main point im seeing is that kifykify was in a bad thread. the thread was posting porn and gore stuff. he didnt post porn and gore, but he posted one "nsfw" pic that was meant to be funny if i were to guess(the hentai). then, all of the users in that thread were permabanned. the supposed problem is that he is not being reconsidered for an unban, even though he only posted one nsfw pic and 'barely did anything wrong'. so, in a way, he deserves an unban and this is unfair. this is the common complaint im seeing.
----------------------------------------------------------
this is what i would like to explain:
the ban was based on group behavior, not on a single isolated image. multiple users coordinated by joining the forum with matching profile pictures, clearly signaling themselves as a group. one member of that group created a thread and began posting pornographic and graphic gore. a second member joined and escalated by posting more porn and gore. a third member, kifykify, also entered the thread, laughed along, and contributed by posting pornographic material himself while replying to one of the prior members. additionally in the same reply, this user made a pedophilic remark, which was weird especially regarding its context, even if it were a joke. i would go back and look for specifics, however it was perma deleted due to the severity of the content in the thread

while it is true that this user posted less extreme content than the others, that does not make his participation acceptable or separate from the incident. he knowingly joined a thread with the purpose being to send rule breaking and permabannable content, encouraged the behavior through participation, and added his own material to it. because the group presented itself as coordinated and acted together in the same thread, all participants were treated as part of the same incident. the moderation decision was not based on who crossed the line the furthest. the users made it quite clear that they wanted to be identified as a group (and also made it quite clear they wanted to be permabanned imo). but all of a sudden when kifykify hasnt been given a chance to be unbanned, he is fighting/defending for only himself and how he "did the least" of the group.

for these reasons, he is not seen as an innocent bystander. it was a coordinated group engaging in behavior thats not allowed, and that is why the ban stands if i were to guess. dean said he stays banned, so theres no further arguing about it really. im sad for him that cp rumors are being spread though, and i will always disprove that


i would start to panic and run out of the store. i would think somebody is messing with me

Who started those CP claims tho ? Kifykify is from what I know not an user who constantly challenged the rules or anything. Even if he did coordinate with a group to post pornography, his individual actions should be taken into account for his ban or not. Is there any way you or another mod could plead for his unban ?

Info Slowest snail of the team

Feb 1, 2026

It has to be Dean frfr, those who unban doxxers and negros who sexually harass women and minors here
him btw: "Ye Ye I'm gonna be harsher with the bans" Ye negro the doxxers are here
Don't let him see this or my thread could go ghost mode

@Marlonmogsyouhaha

• Scootermon
• Replies: 7
• Forum: Off-Topic

• 

He's literally right tho, the mod team is quite unfair with this shit like permabanning @Norwood Reaper for tagging users when he actually contributed with looksmaxxing knowledge and didn't antagonize anyone with his shitposts. But yeah let's let in users who are only here to creep on female users and did some sneaky shit.

 

[Deleted Member 46433]

Info Slowest snail of the team

Feb 1, 2026

It has to be Dean frfr, those who unban doxxers and negros who sexually harass women and minors here
him btw: "Ye Ye I'm gonna be harsher with the bans" Ye negro the doxxers are here
Don't let him see this or my thread could go ghost mode

@Marlonmogsyouhaha

• Scootermon
• Replies: 7
• Forum: Off-Topic

• 

He's literally right tho, the mod team is quite unfair with this shit like permabanning @Norwood Reaper for tagging users when he actually contributed with looksmaxxing knowledge and didn't antagonize anyone with his shitposts.

i didnt know norwood was banned for that. i mean if he wanted to come back, i would vouch for him. i agree that some decisions may seem unfair.
an admin or mod technically does not have to help any user be unbanned if it was specifically a permaban done by an admin. that signals that a decision was already made to get rid of a user for good. however of course, mods do discuss giving users second chances when they ask, but its the mod's choice to do so, not a requirement. while this may seem very unfair to people who feel wrongly permabanned, this is just a website, and being permabanned on .com is not the end of the world. an individual person owns the forum, and its not like this is some company that owes perfect customer service. this incident only happened a month ago, and i just feel like kifykify hasnt given it any time either to expect an admin to let him back

now a hypothesis i also have is that users who identify themselves with a group (like abo) are given less "second chances" after being permabanned now. we all saw what happened when iloveroosters was given another chance, and i personally think that changed how patient the admins are now

so to answer your question, yes, it may seem unfair, but it only seems unfair because any time a system is set up where one person decides which people deserve an unban, it will always seem unfair. if it were unanimous though, there will always be disagreements. i dont know who started the CP stuff. his individual actions do matter, i agree. the point was that he wanted to be seen as a group. they wanted to be permabanned. they planned to make that post and get permabanned. im just confused as to why now he wants to separate himself from the group that he wanted to be in. its also true that mods can plead for his unban. i personally havent done it because i dont know who kifykify is, so i cant vouch for him at all. respectfully, i never really paid attention to his threads. i said this to him too on discord when he blamed me for banning him. any mod is free to plead for his unban if they want to, as i know he was popular and many others know him

 

[Deleted Member 46433]

so to answer your question, yes, it may seem unfair, but it only seems unfair because any time a system is set up where one person decides which people deserve an unban, it will always seem unfair.

to clarify i mean that sometimes the mods dont get a choice as to who is unbanned

 

[Blackpillirony]

i didnt know norwood was banned for that. i mean if he wanted to come back, i would vouch for him. i agree that some decisions may seem unfair.

Would be much appreciated thank you, I think he has learned his lesson of not mass tagging users like that anymore.

an admin or mod technically does not have to help any user be unbanned if it was specifically a permaban done by an admin. that signals that a decision was already made to get rid of a user for good. however of course, mods do discuss giving users second chances when they ask, but its the mod's choice to do so, not a requirement. while this may seem very unfair to people who feel wrongly permabanned, this is just a website, and being permabanned on .com is not the end of the world. an individual person owns the forum, and its not like this is some company that owes perfect customer service. this incident only happened a month ago, and i just feel like kifykify hasnt given it any time either to expect an admin to let him back

Crazy thing coming from a mod or said website but I kinda get what you mean. My problem lies in the consistency of those permabans.

now a hypothesis i also have is that users who identify themselves with a group (like abo) are given less "second chances" after being permabanned now. we all saw what happened when iloveroosters was given another chance, and i personally think that changed how patient the admins are now

Yet one specific user has been permabanned/unbanned multiple times in the last month and his recent unbanned was only so a mod could edate him... Kifykify is from what I know pretty unproblematic overall, I don't think he'll post porn ever again and will just keep on with his LIT Killah posts.

so to answer your question, yes, it may seem unfair, but it only seems unfair because any time a system is set up where one person decides which people deserve an unban, it will always seem unfair. if it were unanimous though, there will always be disagreements. i dont know who started the CP stuff. his individual actions do matter, i agree. the point was that he wanted to be seen as a group. they wanted to be permabanned. they planned to make that post and get permabanned. im just confused as to why now he wants to separate himself from the group that he wanted to be in. its also true that mods can plead for his unban. i personally havent done it because i dont know who kifykify is, so i cant vouch for him at all. respectfully, i never really paid attention to his threads. i said this to him too on discord when he blamed me for banning him. any mod is free to plead for his unban if they want to, as i know he was popular and many others know him

I understand you not vouching for his unban but I've been told from other mods that he should be kept banned for being a pedo when in reality he just pornography, which yeah is a valid reason to ban someone over but other than that Kify was unproblematic, wasn't involved in something like doxxing, didn't antagonize users and only ban evaded once. He has all the right to defend himself against the pedo allegations told on him (he's under 18 btw) and to be unbanned for something that has not hurt anyone in anyway.

 

[Deleted Member 46433]

Would be much appreciated thank you, I think he has learned his lesson of not mass tagging users like that anymore.

Crazy thing coming from a mod or said website but I kinda get what you mean. My problem lies in the consistency of those permabans.

Yet one specific user has been permabanned/unbanned multiple times in the last month and his recent unbanned was only so a mod could edate him... Kifykify is from what I know pretty unproblematic overall, I don't think he'll post porn ever again and will just keep on with his LIT Killah posts.

I understand you not vouching for his unban but I've been told from other mods that he should be kept banned for being a pedo when in reality he just pornography, which yeah is a valid reason to ban someone over but other than that Kify was unproblematic, wasn't involved in something like doxxing, didn't antagonize users and only ban evaded once. He has all the right to defend himself against the pedo allegations told on him (he's under 18 btw) and to be unbanned for something that has not hurt anyone in anyway.

i mean to be fair he made a pedophile joke. it was a joke but still disgusting, so i figured thats why people were saying that. not because he posted cp, but just because he made that weird joke. he just made a joke about loving bicycles and stuff






i also have no idea who you mean with the edate stuff honestly. im sort of out of the loop with that stuff.

anyways, ill take what you said into account though. i agree that i think the consistency of the permabans is not good, but i really cant control that. i can only explain why its inconsistent since its a combination of peoples opinions on who should deserve to come back or not. so yes, i can vouch for kify, but dont think it guarantees anything. like i said before, i think the "being a part of a group" thing makes it harder

 

[Blackpillirony]

i mean to be fair he made a pedophile joke. it was a joke but still disgusting, so i figured thats why people were saying that. not because he posted cp, but just because he made that weird joke. he just made a joke about loving bicycles and stuff

I remember I too made a bad, unfunny and immature joke about CP back in mid to late September that got me a 20% warning. Kifykify is immature, not a pedophile.

i also have no idea who you mean with the edate stuff honestly. im sort of out of the loop with that stuff.

Can tell you all via DC pms

anyways, ill take what you said into account though. i agree that i think the consistency of the permabans is not good, but i really cant control that. i can only explain why its inconsistent since its a combination of peoples opinions on who should deserve to come back or not. so yes, i can vouch for kify, but dont think it guarantees anything. like i said before, i think the "being a part of a group" thing makes it harder

Thank you very much for taking what I say into consideration, on my part I'll see with Kify about the whole group thing.