GOOD TIDINGS AND ANAL LIBATIONS BHAIS AND FHAIS (FOID BHAIS)
TODAY I WILL BE GOING OVER ONE OF THE MOST UNDERRATED AND MISUNDERSTOOD IMPLANTS IF ALL TIME. CHEEK IMPLANTS!!
(If you dnr me i will use african slave magic to summon hexum from the dead to play with your ovaries and prostates bastards)
HIGH MALAR VS SUBMALAR
High malar and submalar are not interchangeable. They dont do the same thing, they dont sit in the same place, and they absolutely should not be used on the same faces. Submalar implants sit lower, closer to the maxilla, and were designed to compensate for age related volume loss and soft tissue collapse. THATS IT n*****s. They were never meant to create sharp zygomatic definition. Putting submalar implants on a young face that already has decent fat is how you get that swollen, heavy midface that people then call uncanny.
High malar implants sit higher, closer to the orbital rim and the zygomatic body. They augment the actual cheekbone, not the soft midface. This is what creates that sharp light break under the eye and the hollow beneath it.
IMPLANT SIZE AND PROJECTION
Size is another thing people constantly screw up. Bigger is not better. (Unless you got a fat dih n***a dih maxxxing guide dropping the first of black history month ) Most good looking high malar implants are small to moderate in projection. Fr like 3 to 5 mm for most faces. Sometimes even 2 mm if the placement and vector are correct. Once you start going past 6 or 7 mm in the cheek, especially anteriorly, youre begging for distortion unless your base bone is extremely flat or deficient.
WHY SUBMALAR LOOKS BAD ON YOUNG FACES
Listen closely n*****s, submalar implants tend to be larger by necessity, often in the 5 to 9 mm range, because theyre compensating for volume loss, but thats exactly why they look bad on younger people. THEIR FOR OLD ASS n*****s!!! Youre adding bulk where you should be preserving contrast. People see those results and think cheek implants are the problem when it’s just the wrong implant for the wrong face.
MALE CHEEKBONE PROJECTION
Another thing nobody likes to admit is that lateral projection matters more than anterior projection for men. THATS JEWISH NIGGABABBLE. A lot of surgeons push anterior malar fullness because its easy and photographs well head on, but from any angle it softens the face. Masculine cheekbones widen the face through the zygomatic arch. Thats why male high malar implants should usually bias lateral and superior vectors, not straight forward projection. Forward heavy implants with no width just make the midface look padded.
FEMALE CHEEKBONE DIFFERENCES
Women are different. (@Tortas and mentally deranged femcels hmu) A higher apex under the outer canthus with smoother transitions works better. Too much lateral widening on women can look harsh or masculine unless the jaw and chin are also strong enough to balance it. Again this isnt opinion, its sexual dimorphismism in skulls.
PLACEMENT HEIGHT MATTERS
People also underestimate how much placement height matters. A high malar implant placed even a few millimeters too low starts acting like a submalar implant visually. Thats how you end up with that droopy midface look even if the implant itself isnt that big. Then you’re venturing into looking like middle aged suburban Florida mom who let some random jamaican immigrant shove plastic in her face. Tight to bone, high placement, minimal inferior spill is everything.
MOVEMENT AND STIFFNESS MYTH
And no, cheek implants dont make your face stiff you wont look like bonnie blue five hours after getting spit roasted by tall nigerian men just cause you get implants. Silicone implants placed subperiosteally sit on bone. Your soft tissue still moves. If someone looks frozen it’s because the implant is oversized, poorly contoured, or the surgeon butchered the pocket. Thats not a flaw of implants, thats incompetence and hypersonic niggarism.
AGING ARGUMENT (MORE JEWISH PROPOGANDA)
The aging argument is so FAWKING tired. “MUHHHH THEY AGE YOU BRO YOULL LOOK LIKE OZEMPIC SATNA CLAUSE MUH” SYBAU SOMALI BASTARD. Aging is loss of skeletal support and downward movement. High malar projection is associated with youth across basically every population on earth. What ages people is low, heavy submalar bulk dragging the face down. Again, wrong implant, wrong placement. If youre actually chasing elite tier zygos, youre not looking for fullness. Youre looking for angleslight breaks and contrast. That usually means conservative high malar implants in the 2 to 5 mm range, placed high and slightly lateral, not giant submalar blocks sitting low in the face.
CLOSING
DONT FALL FOR THE JEWISH PROPOGANDS BHAIS. Cheek implants didnt get a bad reputation because theyre bad. They got a bad reputation because surgeons keep using submalar implants where high malar implants should be used, oversizing them, and then acting surprised when people look like a two cent crack hoe that shakes ass at your local 7/11 every monday for quarters and slim jim’s.
SINCERELY, ACLONEDTYRONE
@
@Nbernical @Born Superior @vampi @TonyDr @RAD@Newday @vespertine @2Beau @97baHater @acketar@apatheia @BigDihDiddy @Cat. @jimmybob392 @homiespidy @snow @Kaari @kifykify @Koji @Love @Molotongo @mus.@Orka @PingPong @pxe @Spuffy @rickydickydoodahgrimes@rovea @sigmagoy @trueceljester @Schizotypalcel @Starlet@Trilltown @spreading love @wavyheadrei @ZyzzReincarnate@Ghoultune @ibelieveinunicorns @Enrique ꗞ
@hazyfuture @Thebird
dnrd me and have your insides brutally fondled by the lumbering trucel ghosts of all those who have roped in this fuckass community
TODAY I WILL BE GOING OVER ONE OF THE MOST UNDERRATED AND MISUNDERSTOOD IMPLANTS IF ALL TIME. CHEEK IMPLANTS!!
(If you dnr me i will use african slave magic to summon hexum from the dead to play with your ovaries and prostates bastards)
HIGH MALAR VS SUBMALAR
High malar and submalar are not interchangeable. They dont do the same thing, they dont sit in the same place, and they absolutely should not be used on the same faces. Submalar implants sit lower, closer to the maxilla, and were designed to compensate for age related volume loss and soft tissue collapse. THATS IT n*****s. They were never meant to create sharp zygomatic definition. Putting submalar implants on a young face that already has decent fat is how you get that swollen, heavy midface that people then call uncanny.
High malar implants sit higher, closer to the orbital rim and the zygomatic body. They augment the actual cheekbone, not the soft midface. This is what creates that sharp light break under the eye and the hollow beneath it.
IMPLANT SIZE AND PROJECTION
Size is another thing people constantly screw up. Bigger is not better. (Unless you got a fat dih n***a dih maxxxing guide dropping the first of black history month ) Most good looking high malar implants are small to moderate in projection. Fr like 3 to 5 mm for most faces. Sometimes even 2 mm if the placement and vector are correct. Once you start going past 6 or 7 mm in the cheek, especially anteriorly, youre begging for distortion unless your base bone is extremely flat or deficient.
WHY SUBMALAR LOOKS BAD ON YOUNG FACES
Listen closely n*****s, submalar implants tend to be larger by necessity, often in the 5 to 9 mm range, because theyre compensating for volume loss, but thats exactly why they look bad on younger people. THEIR FOR OLD ASS n*****s!!! Youre adding bulk where you should be preserving contrast. People see those results and think cheek implants are the problem when it’s just the wrong implant for the wrong face.
MALE CHEEKBONE PROJECTION
Another thing nobody likes to admit is that lateral projection matters more than anterior projection for men. THATS JEWISH NIGGABABBLE. A lot of surgeons push anterior malar fullness because its easy and photographs well head on, but from any angle it softens the face. Masculine cheekbones widen the face through the zygomatic arch. Thats why male high malar implants should usually bias lateral and superior vectors, not straight forward projection. Forward heavy implants with no width just make the midface look padded.
FEMALE CHEEKBONE DIFFERENCES
Women are different. (@Tortas and mentally deranged femcels hmu) A higher apex under the outer canthus with smoother transitions works better. Too much lateral widening on women can look harsh or masculine unless the jaw and chin are also strong enough to balance it. Again this isnt opinion, its sexual dimorphismism in skulls.
PLACEMENT HEIGHT MATTERS
People also underestimate how much placement height matters. A high malar implant placed even a few millimeters too low starts acting like a submalar implant visually. Thats how you end up with that droopy midface look even if the implant itself isnt that big. Then you’re venturing into looking like middle aged suburban Florida mom who let some random jamaican immigrant shove plastic in her face. Tight to bone, high placement, minimal inferior spill is everything.
MOVEMENT AND STIFFNESS MYTH
And no, cheek implants dont make your face stiff you wont look like bonnie blue five hours after getting spit roasted by tall nigerian men just cause you get implants. Silicone implants placed subperiosteally sit on bone. Your soft tissue still moves. If someone looks frozen it’s because the implant is oversized, poorly contoured, or the surgeon butchered the pocket. Thats not a flaw of implants, thats incompetence and hypersonic niggarism.
AGING ARGUMENT (MORE JEWISH PROPOGANDA)
The aging argument is so FAWKING tired. “MUHHHH THEY AGE YOU BRO YOULL LOOK LIKE OZEMPIC SATNA CLAUSE MUH” SYBAU SOMALI BASTARD. Aging is loss of skeletal support and downward movement. High malar projection is associated with youth across basically every population on earth. What ages people is low, heavy submalar bulk dragging the face down. Again, wrong implant, wrong placement. If youre actually chasing elite tier zygos, youre not looking for fullness. Youre looking for angleslight breaks and contrast. That usually means conservative high malar implants in the 2 to 5 mm range, placed high and slightly lateral, not giant submalar blocks sitting low in the face.
CLOSING
DONT FALL FOR THE JEWISH PROPOGANDS BHAIS. Cheek implants didnt get a bad reputation because theyre bad. They got a bad reputation because surgeons keep using submalar implants where high malar implants should be used, oversizing them, and then acting surprised when people look like a two cent crack hoe that shakes ass at your local 7/11 every monday for quarters and slim jim’s.
SINCERELY, ACLONEDTYRONE
@
@Nbernical @Born Superior @vampi @TonyDr @RAD@Newday @vespertine @2Beau @97baHater @acketar@apatheia @BigDihDiddy @Cat. @jimmybob392 @homiespidy @snow @Kaari @kifykify @Koji @Love @Molotongo @mus.@Orka @PingPong @pxe @Spuffy @rickydickydoodahgrimes@rovea @sigmagoy @trueceljester @Schizotypalcel @Starlet@Trilltown @spreading love @wavyheadrei @ZyzzReincarnate@Ghoultune @ibelieveinunicorns @Enrique ꗞ
@hazyfuture @Thebird
dnrd me and have your insides brutally fondled by the lumbering trucel ghosts of all those who have roped in this fuckass community
Last edited:
