Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION
This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more
Old money wins every time. It makes you look like you have your shit together. Take George Clooney, for example. The only caveat is that you must be physically attractive to begin with and fill out the clothes you're wearing, or else you look like picrel.
This is precisely the mindset humanity should carry moving into the postmodern era. If a more extensive degradation or even a collapse of Western society were to occur, we would need as many strong, resilient human beings as possible. Again, it becomes a matter of who will "carry the boats."...
Oh, I see. That makes infinitely more sense, thank you. I thought you intended to propose the extremist postmodern feminist agenda to create a superior Amazonian race where men are no longer biologically relevant or even present, for that matter. You are just talking about elevating both sexes...
I've reviewed this statement and realize I may have miscalculated your intention. Did you mean an equal elevation of both sexes or a reversal of the current biological advantage of men over women in favor of women?
And who says that the solution to postmodern disparity is furthering such disparity? Perpetuating the swing of the cultural pendulum won't solve any problems; it only furthers them in the opposite direction.
What I meant by this statement is as civilization developed through "hard times," it became advantageous for men to be stoic. I can see where my logic might have been confusing, as now, during the "easy times," the narrative being pushed through mainstream culture is that such attitudes are...
Precisely. Biological men hold a significant physical and athletic advantage over women (cry about it, trans athletes, you'll never be equal), and this is why men, over the development of our civilization, have learned to tighten their emotional range. It is a survival tactic. For a long time...
You have a good point about stoicism in that situation. I've read up on how the incel community online essentially turned into what it is now. From their perspective, yeah, there is a problem that needs correction, and group action sounds like a practical and viable solution. However, it's also...
The only things you could do are either get dermal fillers/other injections, maybe micro-pigmentation (although I don't think that would help in this context) or just plain cosmetic surgery. However, consult your healthcare provider and get some second opinions before you go through with anything.
That's a good point; I guess the anonymity of forums allows for more honesty in some instances. It's like a space where they don't have to worry about the larger societal pressure of sexual experience. I was probably thinking of it from a lens of what mainstream society would think of those people.
My question to you guys is this: why are incels so self-exposing, especially online, about their inceldom? If I were an incel, I would be ashamed and try to improve myself and not complain out loud to other people that "no woman wants to sleep with me" for XYZ reasons. I'm not critical, I get...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.