- Joined
- Sep 5, 2025
- Messages
- 695
- Solutions
- 1
- Time Online
- 3d 17m
- Reputation
- 3,158
how is it not? that’s still abortionSame tbh. But that's not the discussion rn
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
how is it not? that’s still abortionSame tbh. But that's not the discussion rn
frig im sorry sub50 iq mandont do hypotheticals man
every action results in a new universe being made
u just created a universe where a sub 50 iq man lives in despair![]()
In what way?u sound like a baboon
jibberishIn what way?
Blah blahhow is it not? that’s still abortion
do you think all fathers have the right to leave if they dont want the child though? and should they have to pay child supportI think all abortion should be illegal, unless:
Both these conditions need to be reviewed by a court.
- The mother's life is in serious danger if she gives birth
- It was r**e
Having sex is automatically agreeing with the possibility of having a child. Therefore a child being created, unwanted or not, is a result of your decision to have sex.
If you don't want to have a child, don't have sex dumb whore.
Examplejibberish
The technological development being Palantir, nuclear missiles, and synthetic consciousness right? Oh and pesticides in food and 5G activated diseases?Yeah, exactly what @Knight said. Life is a lot safer now, so we can afford to accomadate more lives.
Is it exactly a good thing? I'm divided on that issue.
We're destroying our earth with overpopulation, but it also leads to the greater chance of technological/scientific development.
Nowadays, lower income families are having more children. It's alarming how the birth rate in Europe is plummeting comparing to the soaring of African birth rate. Yeah, they have more abortions, but only due to the fact that they're having more children. High class people are too focused on their work to accommodate 3+ children.
3 seasons of abortion debate and a shitty spinoff!!this shit thread is gonna get 10 pages
If the father didn’t want the child he shouldn’t have hit it raw. No man or woman can escape responsibility over their child without being the sickest most selfish fucks on this planetdo you think all fathers have the right to leave if they dont want the child though? and should they have to pay child support
Obviously notdo you think all fathers have the right to leave if they dont want the child though?
Of course, probably even more responsibilities.and should they have to pay child support
if the head right biggie there every nightIf the father didn’t want the child he should have hit it raw. No man or woman can escape responsibility over their child without being the sickest most selfish fucks on this planet
I love you twinIf the father didn’t want the child he shouldn’t have hit it raw. No man or woman can escape responsibility over their child without being the sickest most selfish fucks on this planet
Why@hachiko can u get ur mod back and delete this thread
mirinObviously not
Of course, probably even more responsibilities.
They decided to have sex, the act of creating a child, just like the woman did
Again I said low class people aswellFalse. Majority are white women. Blacks make up the most late term abortions tho
Fr if people have an argument with that then they should be castrated. God gave us the power to create life. It’s not meant to cope with depression or being a shallow fucking loser.I love you twin
Ok so how are you a eugencistBecause I think aborted beings are human and therefore it's murder
Same tbh. But that's not the discussion rn
Because he’s a fucking pussy
cause debates are useless
I wish@over0 can you work your magic and summon a delete?
Over0 referencecause debates are useless
Overall I'm just against viewing sex as a hobby and instead seeing it as what it is: creating a childmirin
You don’t have to be worry about it half of the population are in 2 countriesWe're destroying our earth with overpopulation
w over0Over0 reference
That’s not bad?? Eugenics aren’t for cosmetic purposes, it’s for filtering out diseases and hereditary disadvantage from your gene pool. If it ain’t your society then it ain’t your problem and these people should be allowed to choose who they fuck and why without you yappingOk so how are you a eugencist
so your concern only appears when it involves two people you consider ‘pure’? yet when its someone you dismiss as a ‘sheboon ape foid’ with a so called ‘mud-born,’ you suddenly dont care. when exactly does abortion matter to you and when doesnt it? your moral compass seems all over the place. i need more to be able to understand where you standBlah blah
in a ltr i think it can be both and be chillOverall I'm just against viewing sex as a hobby and instead seeing it as what it is: creating a child
So leave the debate then, we still wanna talk.cause debates are useless
This has always happened but we also don't know what the tfr is in africa.Yeah, exactly what @Knight said. Life is a lot safer now, so we can afford to accomadate more lives.
Is it exactly a good thing? I'm divided on that issue.
We're destroying our earth with overpopulation, but it also leads to the greater chance of technological/scientific development.
Nowadays, lower income families are having more children. It's alarming how the birth rate in Europe is plummeting comparing to the soaring of African birth rate. Yeah, they have more abortions, but only due to the fact that they're having more children. High class people are too focused on their work to accommodate 3+ children.
Technically I think black babies deserve to live just like white ones.so your concern only appears when it involves two people you consider ‘pure’? yet when its someone you dismiss as a ‘sheboon ape foid’ with a so called ‘mud-born,’ you suddenly dont care. when exactly does abortion matter to you and when doesnt it? your moral compass seems all over the place. i need more to be able to understand where you stand
Eugenics isn’t always about racism but racism is always about eugenics. Also there’s symbolic purity in keeping your bloodline true to its origins. This is observable in many cultures over the years. The race mixing is part of the Jewish psyop to dilute culture differences so they can use social media and hookup culture to create their optimized slave culture and when they make a one world government, no opposition will exist because they seduced the opposition into its own genetic and cultural extinction. Look at Japan. Look at the UK.so your concern only appears when it involves two people you consider ‘pure’? yet when its someone you dismiss as a ‘sheboon ape foid’ with a so called ‘mud-born,’ you suddenly dont care. when exactly does abortion matter to you and when doesnt it? your moral compass seems all over the place. i need more to be able to understand where you stand
How are cosmetics not a hereditary disadvantage? Also idk why you're whinging about me when this thread is about abortion and ops opinion is contradictory to his other thoughts.That’s not bad?? Eugenics aren’t for cosmetic purposes, it’s for filtering out diseases and hereditary disadvantage from your gene pool. If it ain’t your society then it ain’t your problem and these people should be allowed to choose who they fuck and why without you yapping
You know what I mean. More chances of great scientists, engineers, mathematicians, etc.The technological development being Palantir, nuclear missiles, and synthetic consciousness right? Oh and pesticides in food and 5G activated diseases?
Type of faggots who liked Kirks assassinationSo leave the debate then, we still wanna talk.
arent you ethnicTechnically I think black babies deserve to live just like white ones.
But ethnic abortions lead to fewer ethnics which I support. It's more of a joke. The ethnocide problem should be solved by deportation and not by abortion
i am 50 iq manfrig im sorry sub50 iq man
Wtf I'm Germanarent you ethnic
I’m Gothams reckoningWtf I'm German
oh okay !Wtf I'm German
In the 1800s the quality of education was low. And there were way less people. Quality of education is irrelevant and was completely shaped by secular Jewish committees, the Rockefellers and the governmentYou know what I mean. More chances of great scientists, engineers, mathematicians, etc.
But a counter to my previous argument on overpopulation "but it also leads to the greater chance of technological/scientific development" would be that the quality of education will be lower. Firstly, the teacher will be spread more thin having to teach more students at once. Secondly, schools will need more funding from the government, leading to either and increase in government spending (which generally results in increased taxation), or the schools won't recieve as much funding, leading to a shitty quality of education.
It's generally the labour-dominant countries that are overpopulated. India, China, Thailand, etc. These countries get a majority of their income from exporting manufactured goods, so it would be incentivised by the government for parents to have more children (more money for government and family).
DisgustingType of faggots who liked Kirks assassination
why are you coping?Wtf I'm German
FalseAlso literally every woman irl is pro choice so good luck