Join 51,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Abortion take - debate me bitches

I think all abortion should be illegal, unless:
  1. The mother's life is in serious danger if she gives birth
  2. It was r**e
Both these conditions need to be reviewed by a court.

Having sex is automatically agreeing with the possibility of having a child. Therefore a child being created, unwanted or not, is a result of your decision to have sex.

If you don't want to have a child, don't have sex dumb whore.
do you think all fathers have the right to leave if they dont want the child though? and should they have to pay child support
 
Yeah, exactly what @Knight said. Life is a lot safer now, so we can afford to accomadate more lives.
Is it exactly a good thing? I'm divided on that issue.
We're destroying our earth with overpopulation, but it also leads to the greater chance of technological/scientific development.


Nowadays, lower income families are having more children. It's alarming how the birth rate in Europe is plummeting comparing to the soaring of African birth rate. Yeah, they have more abortions, but only due to the fact that they're having more children. High class people are too focused on their work to accommodate 3+ children.
The technological development being Palantir, nuclear missiles, and synthetic consciousness right? Oh and pesticides in food and 5G activated diseases?
 
do you think all fathers have the right to leave if they dont want the child though? and should they have to pay child support
If the father didn’t want the child he shouldn’t have hit it raw. No man or woman can escape responsibility over their child without being the sickest most selfish fucks on this planet
 
do you think all fathers have the right to leave if they dont want the child though?
Obviously not
and should they have to pay child support
Of course, probably even more responsibilities.
They decided to have sex, the act of creating a child, just like the woman did
 
Ok so how are you a eugencist
That’s not bad?? Eugenics aren’t for cosmetic purposes, it’s for filtering out diseases and hereditary disadvantage from your gene pool. If it ain’t your society then it ain’t your problem and these people should be allowed to choose who they fuck and why without you yapping
 
Blah blah
so your concern only appears when it involves two people you consider ‘pure’? yet when its someone you dismiss as a ‘sheboon ape foid’ with a so called ‘mud-born,’ you suddenly dont care. when exactly does abortion matter to you and when doesnt it? your moral compass seems all over the place. i need more to be able to understand where you stand
 
Yeah, exactly what @Knight said. Life is a lot safer now, so we can afford to accomadate more lives.
Is it exactly a good thing? I'm divided on that issue.
We're destroying our earth with overpopulation, but it also leads to the greater chance of technological/scientific development.


Nowadays, lower income families are having more children. It's alarming how the birth rate in Europe is plummeting comparing to the soaring of African birth rate. Yeah, they have more abortions, but only due to the fact that they're having more children. High class people are too focused on their work to accommodate 3+ children.
This has always happened but we also don't know what the tfr is in africa.
 
so your concern only appears when it involves two people you consider ‘pure’? yet when its someone you dismiss as a ‘sheboon ape foid’ with a so called ‘mud-born,’ you suddenly dont care. when exactly does abortion matter to you and when doesnt it? your moral compass seems all over the place. i need more to be able to understand where you stand
Technically I think black babies deserve to live just like white ones.
But ethnic abortions lead to fewer ethnics which I support. It's more of a joke. The ethnocide problem should be solved by deportation and not by abortion
 
so your concern only appears when it involves two people you consider ‘pure’? yet when its someone you dismiss as a ‘sheboon ape foid’ with a so called ‘mud-born,’ you suddenly dont care. when exactly does abortion matter to you and when doesnt it? your moral compass seems all over the place. i need more to be able to understand where you stand
Eugenics isn’t always about racism but racism is always about eugenics. Also there’s symbolic purity in keeping your bloodline true to its origins. This is observable in many cultures over the years. The race mixing is part of the Jewish psyop to dilute culture differences so they can use social media and hookup culture to create their optimized slave culture and when they make a one world government, no opposition will exist because they seduced the opposition into its own genetic and cultural extinction. Look at Japan. Look at the UK.
 
That’s not bad?? Eugenics aren’t for cosmetic purposes, it’s for filtering out diseases and hereditary disadvantage from your gene pool. If it ain’t your society then it ain’t your problem and these people should be allowed to choose who they fuck and why without you yapping
How are cosmetics not a hereditary disadvantage? Also idk why you're whinging about me when this thread is about abortion and ops opinion is contradictory to his other thoughts.
 
The technological development being Palantir, nuclear missiles, and synthetic consciousness right? Oh and pesticides in food and 5G activated diseases?
You know what I mean. More chances of great scientists, engineers, mathematicians, etc.

But a counter to my previous argument on overpopulation "but it also leads to the greater chance of technological/scientific development" would be that the quality of education will be lower. Firstly, the teacher will be spread more thin having to teach more students at once. Secondly, schools will need more funding from the government, leading to either an increase in government spending (which generally results in increased taxation -> less disposable income for taxpayers), or the schools won't recieve as much funding, leading to a shitty quality of education.

It's generally the labour-dominant countries that are overpopulated. India, China, Thailand, etc. These countries get a majority of their income from exporting manufactured goods, so it would be incentivised by the government for parents to have more children (more money for government and family).
 
Technically I think black babies deserve to live just like white ones.
But ethnic abortions lead to fewer ethnics which I support. It's more of a joke. The ethnocide problem should be solved by deportation and not by abortion
arent you ethnic
 
You know what I mean. More chances of great scientists, engineers, mathematicians, etc.

But a counter to my previous argument on overpopulation "but it also leads to the greater chance of technological/scientific development" would be that the quality of education will be lower. Firstly, the teacher will be spread more thin having to teach more students at once. Secondly, schools will need more funding from the government, leading to either and increase in government spending (which generally results in increased taxation), or the schools won't recieve as much funding, leading to a shitty quality of education.

It's generally the labour-dominant countries that are overpopulated. India, China, Thailand, etc. These countries get a majority of their income from exporting manufactured goods, so it would be incentivised by the government for parents to have more children (more money for government and family).
In the 1800s the quality of education was low. And there were way less people. Quality of education is irrelevant and was completely shaped by secular Jewish committees, the Rockefellers and the government
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • brutalformelo
Back
Top